Previous in Forum: Expansion Tank   Next in Forum: Cryogenic Pump Priming Problem
Close
Close
Close
12 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 14
Good Answers: 1

SS 316 & SS 316L

09/19/2009 12:27 AM

Dear all,

Please tell me Which one is most suitable for welding? and Why?

SS 316 or SS 316L

__________________
Viral Patel
Register to Reply
Pathfinder Tags: SS 316
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#1

Re: SS 316 & SS 316L

09/19/2009 12:38 AM

Not much difference, except 316L has less carbon for enhanced corrosion resistance.

Weld away!

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 14
Good Answers: 1
#2
In reply to #1

Re: SS 316 & SS 316L

09/19/2009 12:43 AM

I want to know for small vessel whichone is better becos welding is done for fabrication of same.

__________________
Viral Patel
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#3
In reply to #2

Re: SS 316 & SS 316L

09/19/2009 12:51 AM

What will the small vessel contain? What size is small?

316L is more expensive, last I knew.

Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2
#4

Re: SS 316 & SS 316L

09/19/2009 2:10 PM

Both are suitable for welding, refer your project or client spec for requirements

SS316L low carbon content, which is mostly prefering compare to SS316.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: I'm outa here
Posts: 1924
Good Answers: 196
#5
In reply to #4

Re: SS 316 & SS 316L

09/19/2009 11:00 PM

Use 316L if welding and you want to preserve corrosion resistance and strength. Following link has good simple answers:

http://www.finishing.com/143/56.shtml

Ed Weldon

Register to Reply
3
Power-User

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chennai - India.
Posts: 273
Good Answers: 18
#6
In reply to #5

Re: SS 316 & SS 316L

09/20/2009 3:09 AM

You can use both materials depending upon your client's design and end use applications.

Both are easily weldable. But use only E 316L (or) ER 316L type consumables while welding AISI 316L type base metals as they are immune to carbide precipitation in the sensitizing temperature range of 425 -870 deg C.

316L type of materials are recommended for service temp. below 425deg C.

Use moderate current conditions in both cases. Sridhar.

__________________
What we have done for ourselves alone dies with us: while what we have done for other and the society remains and is immortal.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 3)
2
Power-User

Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 225
Good Answers: 4
#7

Re: SS 316 & SS 316L

09/21/2009 2:50 AM

316L. The L means that this SS has a lower Carbon Content, max 0.03% vs the 0.08 of the SS 316. This lower content means that 316L has a much lower sensitivity to Sensitization, precipitation of Chromium Carbide during welding, vs the "normal" 316. Sensitization reduces the corrosion resistance of the SS when in contact with an aggressive environment. You can "restore" the corrosion resistance of a sensitized SS with a full solution annealing - that means heating to 1050°C and rapid cooling. You can use the SS316 if it will not be used in an aggressive environment or if you can anneal it.

s

corrosion protection & control

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Associate

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 52
Good Answers: 2
#8

Re: SS 316 & SS 316L

09/21/2009 8:37 AM

The L is for low carbon to enhance welding. However do not pay more for it. Most stainlesses are now dual certified. If you are being offered 316 ask for the test report and carbon content

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
2
Guru
Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member Egypt - Member - Member since 02/18/2007

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Posts: 1733
Good Answers: 248
#9

Re: SS 316 & SS 316L

09/21/2009 1:36 PM

Very important conclusion:

Use the standard austenitic alloys 316 whenever the part will not be welded or can be solution annealed after welding.

Use the low carbon versions 316L for parts that will be welded and cannot be solution annealed after welding.

• For some detailed informations, see the following Comparison_of_316_and_316L.

__________________
It is better to be defeated on principles, than to win on lies!
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Anonymous Poster
#10

Re: SS 316 & SS 316L

10/23/2009 12:39 AM

Hi Dude

SS316L is most suitable for welding due to less carbon content than SS316.

Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2
#11

Re: SS 316 & SS 316L

11/08/2009 10:25 AM

I need to do food grilling grills 1 / 8 in diameter would use the material, which is the most appropriate and least expensive stainless

thanks

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chennai - India.
Posts: 273
Good Answers: 18
#12
In reply to #11

Re: SS 316 & SS 316L

11/09/2009 12:02 AM

You can use

A 276 TP 410 (straight chrome steel, economical and but may corrode if it s not properly

maintained)

A 276 TP 304 (fully austenite steel no problem what so ever, durable for long time)

SA 479 302 (fully austenite steel no problem what so ever, durable for long time)

SA 479 304 (fully austenite steel no problem what so ever, durable for long time) etc.

They are available in rods / bars can be welded if required. You can choose the material depending upon its availability and cost factor. You can 316 , 304L, type also but they will be expensive.

Sridhar.

__________________
What we have done for ourselves alone dies with us: while what we have done for other and the society remains and is immortal.
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 12 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Abdel Halim Galala (1); Anonymous Poster (1); durai (1); Ed Weldon (1); isamiche14 (1); lyn (2); MSsteel1 (1); sabapara (1); SRIDHAR (2); strider6 (1)

Previous in Forum: Expansion Tank   Next in Forum: Cryogenic Pump Priming Problem

Advertisement