Efficient and not polluting gun-engine technology

so he's geting 40% more power from 10% by weight of the same fuel?

that seems very strange as most petrol engines are aroung 25% efficient, so hes using a 1/10 of the fuel to gain 40% more power. so that makes the engine 250% efficient without incorperating the 40 % increase in power :S

unless you mean he cut the fuel to 10% by air to fuel ratio?

Mike the existing engines made us masters of waste. There ar 25 causes of th inefficiency in engines. By combining engine with gun I've eliminated all, but always existing friction. Let me give you an example: Because during combustion piston is aligned with centerline of piston the highest pressure is wasted on wearin off parts without any contribution to torque or power.

In the invention the highest pressure occurs whe crank is horizontal, therfore torque boosts 100 times. Why?

in diesel highest torqueoccurs when piston is in half of cylinder and exhausts has expanded so pressure is seven times lower than max for compression ratio 14! But in my invention pressure acting in this position is 14 times higer than max pressure in diesel (dtonation yields higher pressure) Therfore Torque T=1x7 T of diesel= 97.

Apart from this cause inefficiency I also eliminated 23 other causes, so I got 95% fuel saving!

Stan

yes the current technology's we have are ineficient at 25% of the maximum avaliable power per weight of petrol.

do you have any diagram's showing how the engine works/ operates?

and do you have any numbers/ graphs for the efficiency of the engine, as-in % of the avaliable power converted.

and also you dont mention weather you are using 10% of the fuel by weigh/time , or air to fuel ratio?

Mike;

The gun-engine is well described on the internet, but shortly;

Placing a gun over cylinder causes:augmentation of volume where exhaust expands and in addition the bullet that squeezes air over piston introduces delay of building pressure over piston, thus by proper selection of the mass of bullet and amount of exploded fuel a replication of the highest pressure meets horizontal crank, which improves engine by design and not external processes! Isn't that simple???

You should have no problem with understanding this approach if you know basics of physics!

Unfortunately I cannot spare time to explain details but if you go Google you might find more!

Stan

Mike;

Exhausts when expanding produces work and cools. Problem is that in every existing engine expansion is not complete thus not converted heat accumulates in parts and must be removed or the engine melts dowm. The radiator does remove that energy.

Gun-engine expands exhausts below atmospheric pressure thus completely converst the energy released from fuel into work. The exhaust temperature never exceeded 140 F degree (about 70 C degree) therefor all the energy is converted and the efficiency close to that o ideal engine.

Is that obvious and valid?

Stan

Mike; Today only very new engines have efficiency between 20% and 23%, but only 2% of engine's power output is transformed to wheels. The mre detailed description, if allowed, would be shown at World Energy Congress in September. You should participate it is not very expensive to be there.

I understan that you admire XIX century diesel engine technology , but the gun-engine belongs to XXI century, so it is little better.

Stan

mike;

Actually todays engines hardly have 20% efficiency and only when new. On average after a year the engines are no more than 16% efficient. In addition only six perxent is bdelivered to wheels. Therefore huge waste are magins for improvements.

Stan