Warren and I finally got the Niles table spindle into the Poreba lathe. After he dialed it in, he measured up the journals. The bottom, smaller journal that rides in bronze is still in good shape. The upper journal that rides in the cast iron, deformable bearing is worn quite a bit. The upper and lower ends mike up at 12.000 inches. The middle section is worn by 0.050 and is eccentric. The cast iron journal has 6 slots . Three are located at one end and run 2/3 of the way towards the other end. They are 120 degrees apart. The other three run from the other end about 2/3 of the length and are 120 degrees apart and are located between the slots running from the other direction. Heavy felt strips are fitted into the slots to prevent the lubricating oil from being slung out. At one end is a cast integral flange. The inside bore is cylindrical and the outside bore is tapered. The base of the Niles has a large spindle hole that is conical with the large end facing down. The adjustable, cast iron, bearing is slid up into the hole and held up with three large threaded rods. There are six nuts used to both adjust the bearing and to hold the adjusted height/collapsed inner diameter of the collapsible bearing in place. I think the idea is that as the journal and/or bearing wears, you can loosen the nuts between the flange and the base and tighten the nuts up on the top of the flange. This pulls the opposing conical surfaces towards each other and collapses the inside of the bearing to renew the bearing clearance. Unfortunately, it is also worn 0.050 over. The lubrication system is choked everywhere with heavy congealed oil that almost looks like grease. It is very hard. Like the table annular bearing surface, it appears that the lubrication system slowly failed and wear increased dramatically.
Warren is very concerned with turning the collapsible bearing. He feels that if he bolts it to the Bullard VTL table and centers it to the three flange hole and uses an extremely sharp tool in a long boring bar and takes very small cuts that he can make it true again. He can easily true the table, spindle, journal.
The problem then will be making up almost an 1/8 of an inch of surface. He can make a sleeve for the spindle. He would heat it up and press it on and turn it true. My question to you all is should we stick with a cast iron sleeve or should we try to improve the design by adding a bronze sleeve. I have a small bronze foundry that will cast an 11 ½ id by 12 ¼ OD by 19 inch long sleeve for $600.00. Did Niles not use a bronze bearing because they were concerned that the six adjusting slots would cut the bronze surface too fast? Maybe with this type of odd bearing, I would be better off with a steel or stainless steel sleeve.
Additionally, to our amazement, the table thrust bearing is a hardened steel washer! We would like to install a 6" diameter Timken roller bearing thrust washer instead of the plain steel washer. We can adjust the height by taking the difference in height between the thickness of the existing washer minus the height of the Timken thrust bearing ant machining that height off the end of the spindle. Can you imagine how easily that table will spin on a roller thrust bearing? So if we were to do that what thrust capacity should we design for? That would be the weight of the table plus the heaviest piece we would machine. Would we double the load for a 2.0 safety factor?
Good Answers:
"Almost" Good Answers: