Previous in Forum: Roadcasting: User "driven" radio networks   Next in Forum: Cosmos 1 "Solar Sail" Mission Fails
Close
Close
Close
2 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
The Engineer
Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Physics... United States - Member - NY Popular Science - Genetics - Organic Chemistry... Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Ingeniería en Español - Nuevo Miembro - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 5060
Good Answers: 129

CGS, Confusing Students Since 1954

06/21/2005 4:45 PM

If you get confused when you hear the terms baryes, biots, debyes, dynes, ergs, franklins, and galileos, you're not alone, I do too. If you know that these are units of pressure, electric current, electric dipole moment, force, work, electric charge, and acceleration, well done, you know your CGS units.

It's amazing how dependent I am on the MKS system of units. Coulombs, Newtons, Amps, and Joules have become as second nature to me in physics as miles, pounds, and gallons are in everyday life. So recently, when I was trying to get the charge of an electron in terms of the CGS electrostatic unit (esu), I became curious as to the origins of the systems. I took a look around and found a couple of sites that talk about it.

CGS and MKS Units

Wikipedia

I guess it all started towards the end of the 19th century. The CGS system was introduced formally by the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1874. The MKS system was created by the Internation Bureau of Weights and Measures in 1889. Not surprisingly, physicists and engineers that worked on smaller scales took to the CGS system whereas those working in larger scales tended towards MKS. Two systems of units contradicted the ideal of a universal measuring system and in 1954, the Tenth General Conference on Weights and Measures adopted units of measure for all international weights and measures, mostly from the MKS system. In 1960, The Eleventh General Conference adopted the name International System of Units (SI) for these units of measure.

Of course it takes decades to centuries for a system of units to officially disappear, and there is alway a niche or two where they hang on.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Associate
United States - Member - NY Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - RPI Class of '05 Engineering Fields - Energy Engineering - Steam Turbine Aero Design Engineer

Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 53
#1

And what about Imperial Units!?

06/22/2005 10:24 AM

Some industries still use Imperial Units (or English Units) - making things even more confusing - and costing millions (remember the Mars Climate Orbiter?).

Register to Reply
The Feature Creep

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 990
#2

Languagew

06/22/2005 12:02 PM

Units are the syntax of science. The sad thing is that two people can be talking about the same thing and have no idea what other is saying.

__________________
"The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet." -William Gibson
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 2 comments

Previous in Forum: Roadcasting: User "driven" radio networks   Next in Forum: Cosmos 1 "Solar Sail" Mission Fails

Advertisement