Previous in Forum: Gridwall Hook Security   Next in Forum: cold water ice bank design calculations{structure and refrigeration alulations}
Close
Close
Close
27 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 1679
Good Answers: 33

Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/15/2010 9:33 AM

I need to produce a drill bit (3, 8 mm dia) with a long shaft (250mm) to drill a hole into a bone (single use, disposable product). These kind of tools, having a very short contact with the body, not remaining implanted after the intended use are usually made of 304, also 316 or even in 316L. None of our regular suppliers has the diameter I look for in the latter types of SS. I have been offered 302 HQ, which seems to be quite similar to 304. I have found no specific info about the use I need it for: any comments? Thanks a lot!

__________________
the more I move, the deeper I get stuck !
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - Don't Know What Made The Old Title Attractive... Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - 60 Year Member

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Yellowstone Valley, in Big Sky Country
Posts: 7425
Good Answers: 295
#1

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/15/2010 10:27 AM

A while ago I built a new manufacturing facility for these guys:

http://www.micro100.com/

At that time, they would also manufacture micro tools to specification. It looks like they still will. They should be able to speak directly to your question, and make the drills to your spec.

__________________
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 1679
Good Answers: 33
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/15/2010 11:27 AM

Hi Doorman, thanks for your comment. As a matter of fact we can make the tool at our facility at a very low cost (rougly calculated 3.8$ a piece + the cost of the SS rod). Despite nothing wrong should happen by using this type of SS, I was wondering if there was a source to confirm my thoughts or if someone had had a negative experience using it for the same purpose. Best regards! BTW: I always wear boxers!

__________________
the more I move, the deeper I get stuck !
Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - Don't Know What Made The Old Title Attractive... Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - 60 Year Member

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Yellowstone Valley, in Big Sky Country
Posts: 7425
Good Answers: 295
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/15/2010 11:52 AM

Ah.. Sorry, I misunderstood your question.

lynlynch has given more correct info, and has also called the name of one of the material science masters around here. I am sure you will get some more very good advice.

The advice in my signature line is that of my grandmother. She would be happy to hear you are following her advice.

__________________
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#2

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/15/2010 10:29 AM

Milo will know.

302 has 3% Cu.

Below came from: Stainless Steel Information

18-8 is a term used interchangeably when referring to 300 series stainless steel having approximately 18% chromium and 8% nickel. It can include stainless made from 302, 302HQ, 303, 304, 305, 384, and XM7, among others. There is little overall difference in corrosion resistance among these types, but slight differences in chemical composition can make certain grades more resistant than others against particular chemicals or atmospheres. 18-8 bolts are commonly 304 stainless, while screws are typically 302HQ.

There must be some regulatory commission that would have a list of accepted materials.

Where would you go to get approval for a new/non-conforming material?

I thought this web site was a good one.

Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Petroleum Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 3403
Good Answers: 150
#5

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/15/2010 11:51 PM

R&DDoc, given that the device is in short term contact with body tissues and is disposable you really only need something corrsion resistant enough to withstand sterilization and storage. The 300 series stainlesses have two drawbacks I can see in this application. first off, they aren't terribly strong or hard. This means they'll dull quickly, possibly damaging healthy bone through overheating. Secondly they have nickel in them which means that any nickel residue that would remain embedded in the bone may eventually lead to the body forming a nickel contact allergy and start an inflammatory process in the bone (I presume the drilled hole is either for an implant or a bone screw or some other Orthopedic appliance. ) this would not bode well for the long term stability/viability of the implant it would seem to me.

A better option may be a straight chromium steel 400 series heat treatable (martensitic) stainless such as 420 or 440C. These would give you a stainless material that does not have nickel in them and would allow you to heat treat the part for longer wear. The problem of Chloride cracking is not likely to be an issue in the short time frame that the part would be in contact with blood, etc. and there would be very little chance of causing an allergic reaction. 440C MIGHT start showing some cracking by the time you are done drilling, but I doubt it.

__________________
Who is John Galt?
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 1679
Good Answers: 33
#9
In reply to #5

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 8:29 AM

Rorschach! In the first place I would have chosen a 300 or 400 series SS, probably 420 or 304 as they are the most widely available / low cost (at least here). The problem is that I am looking for a diameter of 3,7 to 3,9 mm[b/], and (until now) I only found it in .5 increases: 3mm, 3.5 mm, 4mm and so on. One of our regular suppliers of SS offered 3.9 mm rods to me, and sent me a sample ... but as you say: it is too soft for the intended use. You guessed right: it is to drill a 30 mm long hole in soft bone (by hand)

__________________
the more I move, the deeper I get stuck !
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Petroleum Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 3403
Good Answers: 150
#12
In reply to #9

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 9:28 AM

I understood that there were issues of supply geometry, my point was that by expanding your scope of supply, you might find it supplied in the diameter you need in a different material.

Some other CRS materials that might be suitable as well:

17-4PH

17-7PH

Beta titanium (6Al4V, or one of it's sisters)

All three of these materials are commonly used to manufacture corrosion resistant springs and as such are available in a wide range of wire sizes. They are also all three heat treatable using Instead of trying to specify it in mm, consider specifying it in AWG gauge or even Inches, you might be surprised to find it specified in a different UoM. #7 AWG wire is 3.66522mm #9 Steel Wire Gauge is 3.76682mm #9 Imperial Wire Gauge is 3.6576mm.

Stubb's Steel wire gauge seems most promising, #23 is 3.8862mm, #26 is 3.7084, so anything in between would fit the bill.

Talk to some spring manufacturers, you might get lucky.

Which brings me to a question about something you mentioned earlier, Why is a medical grade required for this short term contact application? what is different about medical grade that an equivalent industrial grade would not be suitable?

__________________
Who is John Galt?
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 1679
Good Answers: 33
#13
In reply to #12

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 10:53 AM

Hi Rorschach, for some uses, I buy wires and tubes from manufacturers in the US. whos standard is AWG. As most products sold here are metric, I went that way first, at this moment I have an assistant searching locally for imperial diameters and AWG. If not found in my country I will have to import it from the US (the issue here is that most companies have rather long delivery times). "" Which brings me to a question about something you mentioned earlier, Why is a medical grade required for this short term contact application? what is different about medical grade that an equivalent industrial grade would not be suitable?"" When it comes to Titanium, the seller of the product must certifie the medical grade of the material, cause you may loose your FDA or CE marks if caught using industrial stuff. I suppose the medical grade Titanium is made using raw materials, while the industrial one has a % of scrap or recycled stuff. (A time ago I red that a company bought bars of Russian Titanium, which made the Geiger counters go mad upon inspection: after some research, they found out some Rusian mills had been using material that came from scrapped nuclear November Class submarines!)

__________________
the more I move, the deeper I get stuck !
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Petroleum Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 3403
Good Answers: 150
#14
In reply to #13

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 11:34 AM

heh, yes, I wrote that. It's a true story too, I've met the metallurgical tech that analyzed the scrap.

My point being if the spectrographic analysis is the same (or rather, good enough, and the Geiger counters aren't ringing off the wall...) who cares where the raw materials came from? especially a cutting tool that is used once and thrown away? now if it was left in the body, that would be a whole different matter

(shakes head and walks off while contemplating the stupidity of government bureaucrats...)

__________________
Who is John Galt?
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 1679
Good Answers: 33
#15
In reply to #14

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 11:58 AM

" (shakes head and walks off while contemplating the stupidity of government bureaucrats...) " Bureucrats and Lawyers make medicine so expensive!!!!

__________________
the more I move, the deeper I get stuck !
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Petroleum Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 3403
Good Answers: 150
#16
In reply to #15

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 12:04 PM

Amen brother! And guess who is writing all the new "health care" regulations? Yeah, same crew.... I really can't see how what they plan is going to be at all cheaper or better, much less constitutional.

__________________
Who is John Galt?
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Petroleum Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 3403
Good Answers: 150
#18
In reply to #12

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 12:42 PM

Have you considered using a coating such as Titanium Nitride or Tungsten Carbide in a Chrome binder to build up on the o.d. of the smaller material?, it would be harder and cut better to boot.

__________________
Who is John Galt?
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#6

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 12:46 AM

r&ddoc is this device classified as a medical device and if so which class (FDA classiifies slightly different to European)? If you can answer this then I maybe able to provide you with some more information.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 1679
Good Answers: 33
#10
In reply to #6

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 8:34 AM

Hi Guest, despite the drill will be used BY HAND (meaning no mechanical effort, due to RPM´s) and will be removed from the body immediately after use, it´s a FDA Class II (European IIa) device.

__________________
the more I move, the deeper I get stuck !
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 225
Good Answers: 4
#7

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 7:19 AM
Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1601
Good Answers: 58
#8

Re: Bio-compatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 7:50 AM

Consider using titanium as a drill bit material. It will make a better drill than 300 series stainless steel and its bio-compatibility is legendary.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 1679
Good Answers: 33
#11
In reply to #8

Re: Bio-compatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 9:00 AM

Hi welderman! you are right, but medical grade titanium is quite more expensive than industrial grade. There are a lot of excellent SS types available, but my problem is more referred to get the diameter I need rather the material to be chosen.

__________________
the more I move, the deeper I get stuck !
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Manchester NH
Posts: 118
Good Answers: 5
#17

Re: Bio compatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 12:37 PM

The majority of this conversation ( wire type, sources, bio compatibility,) is beyond me but I have a couple questions I'd like to ask anyway.

If you have the capacity to manufacture the drills then Why are you worried about the wire size. (in American units) 4.0mm is .007874" larger than 3.8mm Why not centerless grind it to the desired diameter?

Surely either product would still need to go through the same or similar cleaning and inspection processes.

Could this option open up opportunities of wire selection and process changes that could aid overall savings?

Please excuse my naivete. I'm only curious.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 1679
Good Answers: 33
#19
In reply to #17

Re: Bio compatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 1:18 PM

Why are you worried about the wire ... Hi crimich13, your option is valid too, but this wire diameter is a stock product: I just have to find the supplier in Argentina (where I live), or to import it from another country. We are customers of Wytech, a US company in California that can supply this material, but when I requested a quote, they told me their delivery time would be of about 2 weeks, and I need it for YESTERDAY! :-) On the other hand, I do have the machinery for manufacturing the drills, but not for centerless grinding it...

Best regards

__________________
the more I move, the deeper I get stuck !
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Manchester NH
Posts: 118
Good Answers: 5
#20

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 3:13 PM

Contact Information

Contact Person:

Mr. COLLINS WILSON
Offline
Upload your photo to attract more business!

Company Name:CRGO COIL LTD
Street Address:15, COMUNIDAD VALENCIANA
City:Buenos Aires
Province/State:DISTRITO FEDERAL
Country/Region:Argentina
Zip:QWE RTY
Telephone:

Send your message to this supplier Mr. COLLINS WILSON
Offline Enter your message here and then click Send Enter between 20 to 3,000 characters, English only. Didn't find what you're looking for? Post a buying lead.

Does this help? This is all I found so far.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 1679
Good Answers: 33
#21
In reply to #20

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 4:11 PM

Hi crimich, the coordinates are weird: Street Address 15 Comunidad Valenciana seems to be a Zip code in Spain. Distrito Federal is a nomenclature we do not use. We say Capital Federal. Zip QWE RTY does not exist, we use a combination of letters an numbers. Mine es B1644GDC. Might Mr. Collins Wilson´s address be in the Bermudas Triangle? :-) Have a great weekend.

__________________
the more I move, the deeper I get stuck !
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Petroleum Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 3403
Good Answers: 150
#22
In reply to #21

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 4:43 PM

"qwerty" are the first six keys on a US style keyboard, methinks I smell a rat as well.

__________________
Who is John Galt?
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 1679
Good Answers: 33
#24
In reply to #22

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 7:21 PM

My keyboard is qwerty as well, but as the letters were separated in 2 groups of 4 + 2 letters, I missed it!

__________________
the more I move, the deeper I get stuck !
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Manchester NH
Posts: 118
Good Answers: 5
#23
In reply to #21

Re: Bio compatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 4:45 PM

As I'm Not in or from Argentina I had No Idea. Sorry about that. My wife (the alien) agrees with you. She's from Uruguay. Perhaps I should have consulted with her first? She also confirms that there is no such address in the Bermuda triangle either.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 1679
Good Answers: 33
#25
In reply to #23

Re: Bio compatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 7:29 PM

Hi crimich, Thanks for your help anyway! Send my best regards to the "Charrua" from this side of the River Plate! You are a lucky man!

__________________
the more I move, the deeper I get stuck !
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 79
Good Answers: 4
#26

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/16/2010 10:19 PM

You all have a lot of good ideas here.

My wife has a sensitivity to Nickel. If she has common stainless against her forearm for more than a few seconds, she gets a 10 day rash. Her fingertips are a bit more resistant. There are others out there with similar weirdness. You would not want any Nickel alloy in such patients. Plating would have to be fairly thick to protect them.

Just one more thing to worry about.

__________________
Isn't the french fry the most COMMENTATOR ?
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 1679
Good Answers: 33
#27
In reply to #26

Re: Biocompatibility of 302 SS

04/17/2010 8:22 AM

Hi dh, to be honest, besides something like perhaps plasma coating, there are not many surface treatments that can be done on a medical device, as most are potentially harmful

__________________
the more I move, the deeper I get stuck !
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 27 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); crimich13 (3); dhgrant (1); Doorman (2); lyn (1); r&ddoc (11); Rorschach (6); strider6 (1); welderman (1)

Previous in Forum: Gridwall Hook Security   Next in Forum: cold water ice bank design calculations{structure and refrigeration alulations}

Advertisement