Previous in Forum: Sea Water Spray   Next in Forum: HNC Coursework Help
Close
Close
Close
2 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Power-User

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 270
Good Answers: 19

IPN200 Evaluation of Reduced Ductility Due to Bending

04/26/2010 9:15 AM

We are intending to bend an IPN200 steel beam about the major axis but to a very tight radius 1.35m. It can be done but the strain during bending is very high and will affect the steel properties. Yield strength will still be okay but ductility is likely to be a problem as a minimum ductility is required for the steels used in the standard calculations.

I found the following good article on the subject ( http://redigitaleditions.com/Olive/ODE/BDC/Default.aspx?href=BDC/2009/10/03&pageno=44&view=document ) but can find no way of calculating the beams new properties to see if it can fit the bill.

Does anyone have some references for this ?

__________________
omw7
Register to Reply
Pathfinder Tags: bending ductility IPN work hardening
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Glen Mills, PA.
Posts: 2385
Good Answers: 114
#1

Re: IPN200 Evaluation of Reduced Ductility Due to Bending

04/26/2010 12:58 PM

I wouldn't do it that way, but if I did, I would anneal it, have it heated to a dull cherry and then allowed to cool. perhaps in repeating stages. Years ago, I would have had it blacksmithed, heated and bent while hot. Now I would use the same technique that they use for heat straightening, heat short lengths of the inside flange to dull cherry and let it cool. Repeat until the bend is where you want it. You may need this technique anyway if you have tight tolerances, rolling a bend is not very accurate, you don't know the magnitude of the spring back that occurs after rolling until it happens.

__________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 270
Good Answers: 19
#2
In reply to #1

Re: IPN200 Evaluation of Reduced Ductility Due to Bending

04/26/2010 2:24 PM

The price quoted is for cold bent, hence the problem. If it needs to be annealed or normalised then the price will be too high. For the tolerances, the bending company is well reputed and will be able to allow for the spring back in its rolling process as they have already done this tight a radius before. But it may not have been such a structural usage and so they could get away with the strain hardening that occurred without any bother from the authorities. Our current fallback solution is to do a fully welded up section but again this will be more expensive.

__________________
omw7
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 2 comments

Previous in Forum: Sea Water Spray   Next in Forum: HNC Coursework Help

Advertisement