I realize that English is likely at least your second, if not third or fourth language. So I'm not sure if you're asking us how to assemble and test a designed 200-ton press, how to design a 200-ton press or if you want us to provide the design of a 200-ton press. I hope you realize that people normally get paid for an engineering design and that many of the people here get paid for doing this service. So by coming here and possibly asking us to just hand over our hard earned skill for nothing can be very insulting. Please reconsider what you are actually looking for and try to be a little more specific and polite when you return.
__________________
"Don't disturb my circles." translation of Archimedes last words
We are about to procure one and the estimate is $100,000. Of course with all the peripherals.
Once we recieve it, if the vendor agrees i will forward the dimensions (of course he will not give me calculations will he?)
The above is just to stress the complexity, It is simple, but not that simple. Easier part is the mechanical design. You have simple mechanical loading assume the worst condition scenario and do the calculations. Then put the required factor of safety. The difficult is the hydraulics and interlocks. With that size of press, you don't want accidents to happen. So there will be quite a bit of redunduncy in the safety features, that includes the twin setting alarm and trip.
The mechanical design is not as simple as you assume, I was the one to analyse a press (200 Tons) failure which was due to a combination of assumptions for the press frame design and the way the tooling was build and used. It is not enough to place the forces and to let a program compute the stresses. In usage many errors can occur and this has to be imagined already at the design stage, the designer MUST know how the press will be used and imagine what can be done the wrong way in order to avoid failures.
Easier part is the mechanical design. You have simple mechanical loading assume the worst condition scenario .
I never meant it is simple. Sorry if you felt that way. The point I made is (though we do not manufacture press, we are in other machinery, we only buy them as we need) our design concept is as above, so my comment was on those aspects.
In fact now I am struggling to put one of my machines up, where the controls have not taken the worst case scenerio in account.
Problem is simple in a center lathe, the Z axis has a habit of hitting the end stop and as expected sooner or later the lead screw gives way (after a few failures of the encoder area threads now the shaft itself has failed, clearly fatigue failure)
Unfortunate: the operator does not come out clearly about the way he was handling it: manual mode on program, so on my part function as maintenance left with guess.
Aalysis shown the feedback system has a habit of occasional failure. The operating system however surprisingly do not handle the absence of feed-back signal, so in absence of feed-back, it goes in rapid mode and hits the end stop. (BTW we now want to check the other few machines whether they have the same habit- their feedback is working, but if it fails whether they too are going to behave this way or not).
This is a clear signal, that the controls safety features have missed out a potential failure mode.
Anyway we are scrapping the machine, it is a small one (500mm swingx1mt long) and may not be worth the effort and expense to recondition and system change.
The simplest solution is the concept of a hard limit switch. If any machine can produce excessive damage or possibly hold up production for to long, an extra pair of limit switches that work outside of the control system to turn the machine off.
__________________
"Don't disturb my circles." translation of Archimedes last words
I do not know where your lathe comes from but it is common practice to supervise the signal coming from the position sensor and build in a redundancy as Red Fred suggested in order to avoid a mechanical failure in case of feed-back fall out for which ever reason (for instance a cable is interrupted).
In your case the designer was not at the right level it is an aspect you could contest by the manufacturer.
It is an old one, and anyway we are scrapping it as mentioned. Part of modernisation and capacity augmentation. We are trying to keep it running till the replacements (new machines) come.
There is a hard stop (hitting that repeatedly the shaft fails on fatigue). The limits are a bit before that but still the momentum (on rapid) carries the cross slide.
I would like to know how much pressure is needed to convert lead to gold. Jokes aside, your request for free engineering would only be embraced and answered if you are an elementary student with big dreams. Gary
"Almost" Good Answers: