Previous in Forum: Length of Electric Poles   Next in Forum: AutoCAD Civil 3D Alignments
Close
Close
Close
12 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Active Contributor

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 13

Moisture Content of Soils

05/12/2010 11:22 AM

Hello everyone,

I'm trying to establish a correlation between the conventional (oven drying) method of moisture content determination and the rapid (field) method of moisture content determination of a cohesive material, but I am having some difficulties coming out with this correlation. PLEASE HELP ME.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 284
Good Answers: 6
#1

Re: Moisture Content of Soils

05/13/2010 2:07 AM

The conventional oven method is a 'golden standard'. In addition there are (among others):

Electrical resistance

Neutron absorbtion

IR reflection.

Each method's success depends on lots of variables and any method should be well calibrated before using it's results. If you Google and Wiki these methods you'll have an idea about their applicability in your particular case.

In agriculture (probably the most widespread use of this type of measurement) electrical resistance calibrated for local condition is the preferred method.

__________________
Constant change is here to stay!
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hemel Hempstead, UK
Posts: 5826
Good Answers: 322
#2

Re: Moisture Content of Soils

05/13/2010 4:05 AM

Do you mean: you've got the data, and don't know what to do with it:-

In which case try Excel.

Or, are you looking for possible field solutions:-

in which case dovy's answer looks good.

__________________
If you spend all your time looking for people and things to complain about: trust me, you will find plenty to complain about.
Register to Reply
Power-User
Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 259
Good Answers: 29
#3

Re: Moisture Content of Soils

05/13/2010 10:53 AM

We must know which field test method you are using.

If you are using a nuclear density gage that is equipped with an offset function, you can program it to compute the moisture content based on the results of your oven drying tests. If not you can hand calc, i.e. add or subtract the difference between the field test and the lab test. Even if the relationship is not linear, as long as you are testing soils in the same moisture range (+/_ 2%), the accuracy should not be too bad. Say 0.2 or 0.3 percent. That should be sufficient for determining in place density of the soil; if that's what you're doing, which is something else you should let us know.

One field test method dovy left out was the "Speedy Moisture Test." This test uses a reagent (calcium carbide) that reacts with the moisture in the soil to produce a gas (acetylene) causing a pressure increase in the test vessel. The indicated pressure is then compared to a chart for the soil type you are testing to obtain the moisture content. This test has good repeatability and compares well with oven drying for moist soil types.

Let us in on the field test method, and why you are testing plastic material, and we will try to help you out.

__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#5
In reply to #3

Re: Moisture Content of Soils

05/14/2010 9:51 AM

the field method is the use of the speedy meter

Register to Reply
2
Power-User
Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 259
Good Answers: 29
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Moisture Content of Soils

05/14/2010 1:11 PM

The Speedy should give accurate results as long as there is not a lot of large aggregate (passing no. 4 sieve). Make sure you continue to roll the balls until the sample is completely broken down and has had a chance to come in contact with the reagent. I always pour out the contents and examine for moist clumps of material, and always check the cap for any of the original sample that may not have fallen into the vessel.

Another factor that is critical is weighing of the sample. Older models have a balance with no zero (tare) adjustment. I have had to add or remove metal from the cup occasionally when they didn't zero with the check weights.

And finally have the pressure gage calibrated frequently. A six month schedule is required by our test procedure; but due to mishandling, more frequent cal. is often necessary.

If you're following the test procedure and your equipment is in good working condition you should get accurate results for the material you described.

Let us know if you discover if any of the items I suggested are the culprit, or if not let me know so I can be aware of any problems I might encounter.

__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Active Contributor

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 13
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Moisture Content of Soils

05/15/2010 9:42 AM

The Speedy meter i'm using is quite old. It was purchased about 3 years ago but had never been used. Could this be the problem? Also, is there a specified amount of calcium carbide i was supposed to use?

Register to Reply
Power-User
Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 259
Good Answers: 29
#8
In reply to #7

Re: Moisture Content of Soils

05/15/2010 10:10 AM

The complete unit should have a scoop for measuring the calcium carbide. Two scoops is typical, but this measurement is not critical, you just need to make sure you have enough reagent available in the vessel to react with ALL the water.

Here is a link to the procedure we use in Florida: FM 5-507

I would definitely calibrate the unit after being idle for 3 yrs.

Hope this helps

__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 13
#9
In reply to #8

Re: Moisture Content of Soils

05/15/2010 10:21 AM

Thanks so much PMoon, you have been so helpful.

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 13
#10
In reply to #8

Re: Moisture Content of Soils

05/16/2010 2:46 PM

PMoon, please one more thing; can you tell me the principle behind the speedy tester?

Register to Reply
2
Power-User
Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 259
Good Answers: 29
#11
In reply to #10

Re: Moisture Content of Soils

05/16/2010 7:19 PM

Both Boyle's Law and Avogadro's principles are a employed with this test method.

Boyle's Law tells us pressure and volume are inversely proportional; therefore more gas in the same volume causes an increase in pressure.

When the calcium carbide reacts with the water in the sample it creates acetylene gas (You can look up the chemical reaction formula for yourself).

Avogadro proved that the same weight of any compound will have the same number of molecules (You can look that up to, but it's not that important). That means; for a given weight of water in the sample only a certain number of water molecules are available to react with the calcium carbide and produce only that much acetylene gas that causes the pressure increase in the vessel. The amount of pressure increase relates to the amount of water in the sample in this way.

Hope this helps as I tried to be concise.

__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Active Contributor

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 13
#12
In reply to #11

Re: Moisture Content of Soils

05/18/2010 7:30 AM

You are a life saver! Thanks so much...

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hemel Hempstead, UK
Posts: 5826
Good Answers: 322
#4

Re: Moisture Content of Soils

05/13/2010 12:19 PM
__________________
If you spend all your time looking for people and things to complain about: trust me, you will find plenty to complain about.
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 12 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); dovy (1); Peakay (4); PMoon (4); Randall (2)

Previous in Forum: Length of Electric Poles   Next in Forum: AutoCAD Civil 3D Alignments

Advertisement