Previous in Forum: Calculate CT Burden   Next in Forum: How Do I Set Up Lowrey Organ Power Supply Project?
Close
Close
Close
9 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Associate

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 31
Good Answers: 3

Induction Motor Efficiency Vs Its Power Factor

06/23/2010 9:05 AM

I often listen that If the power factor of the motor is high, it will be highly efficient.

I also have a thought that we have maximum up to 90 % efficient induction motors.

There is a motor which is 96.9 % efficient. Name Plate of the Motor is

VEM Sachsenwork GmbH

2000 KW, 690 V, 46.4 Hz, Y, 1985 A, P.F 0.87, 923 RPM

Efficiency = {2000,000 / ( 1.732 *690 *1985 *0.87 ) } = 0.969

Its Power factor is not too high as compared to the following 3 motors

Motor-1 ( 7.5 KW, Efficiency 86.88 % ):

(LEROY SOMER: 7.5 KW, 400 V, 50 Hz, Y, 14 A, P.F 0.89, 1455 RPM)

Motor-2 ( 5.5 KW, Efficiency 87.74 % ):

(LEROY SOMER: 5.5 KW, 400 V, 50 Hz, Y, 10.4 A, P.F 0.87, 1460 RPM)

Motor-3 ( 1.5 KW, Efficiency 80.01 % ):

(LEROY SOMER: 1.5 KW, 400 V, 50 Hz, Y, 3.3 A, P.F 0.82, 1430 RPM)

From These Calculation Can we easily figure out the High effiency of a motor does't mean that it has very high power factor ( >0.9) ?

Can we say that with higher Power Rating of Induction Motors, Efficiency goes on improving? (7.5 KW is more efficient than 1.5 KW)

Upon what factors Power factor of a motor depends?Why Losses in Low Power rating motors are greater than high power rating motors?

If the Power coming to the motor have Low P.F does it effect Motor Efficiency? (There will be increse in (I*I* R) Losses?)

What Percentage are (I*I*R) losses to the total motor losses?

Thanks in Advance.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Islamic Republic of Pakistan
Posts: 124
Good Answers: 14
#1

Re: Induction Motor Efficiency Vs Its Power Factor

06/23/2010 11:18 AM

"There is a motor which is 96.9 % efficient"

I have read first time of so much efficient Induction motor

"Why Losses in Low Power rating motors are greater than high power rating motors?"

Losses in Low Power rating are greater because of the reason that it have high rotor resistance. Due to high rotor resistance it has large slip and high I^2 R losses. Due to high losses they have relatively lower efficiency.

"Upon what factors Power factor of a motor depends?"

Induction motor is combination of inductive load and resistive Load. Mainly itis considered to be an inductive load. Its power factor depends on the following

Z = Stator winding impedance, Ω

XL = Stator winding reactance, Ω

L = inductance of winding, H

"If the Power coming to the motor have Low P.F does it effect Motor Efficiency? (There will be increse in (I*I* R) Losses?)"

Incoming Supply Low Power Factor Doesn't effect the motor efficiency.

From motor power equation P = 1.732 *V*I*P.F*Eff

For lower values of power factor current increases. When power factor is improved,

current decreases approximately with the same proportion

In case of Low P.F incoming supply Line Losses (Transmission) increases not the Motor Internal Losses (significantly)

"What Percentage are (I*I*R) losses to the total motor losses?"

I am not sure but it will be less than 35 % of the total motor losses. Also depend on the KW rating of the motor

Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA, where the Godless live next door to God.
Posts: 4665
Good Answers: 804
#2

Re: Induction Motor Efficiency Vs Its Power Factor

06/23/2010 7:51 PM

"What Percentage are (I*I*R) losses to the total motor losses?"

I am not sure but it will be less than 35 % of the total motor losses. Also depend on the KW rating of the motor

I have read several papers identifying it at 25% of total losses on average.

__________________
** All I every really wanted to be, was... A LUMBERJACK!.**
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Islamic Republic of Pakistan
Posts: 124
Good Answers: 14
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Induction Motor Efficiency Vs Its Power Factor

06/23/2010 10:37 PM

Thank U very much for correcting me .

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#4

Re: Induction Motor Efficiency Vs Its Power Factor

06/24/2010 2:06 AM

Motor Efficiency is Depicted as: η =0.7457 x hp x Load/Pi Where: η = Efficiency as operated in % Por = Nameplate rated horsepower Load = Output power as a % of rated power Pi = Three-phase power in kW The Efficiency in the above equation is related to the Load output. And if the input power factor is low it directly affects the output power and its efficiency also. The Current Decreases as Power factor increased mentioned in the earlier reply is seems very interesting, in general if power factor is improved the current is brought in align with the voltage to reach the real power of the system and not to reduce the current.

Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 31
Good Answers: 3
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Induction Motor Efficiency Vs Its Power Factor

06/24/2010 3:56 AM

From Ur statement and equation what I understand is that efficiency depend upon the running Load on the Motor

The equation mentioned is

Efficiency ( %) = {0.7457 * HP *Load (Running Load)}/{Pi (Power Input)}

If I am not wrong then it will be ( In terms of KW)

Efficiency ( %) = {Po *Load }/{Pi }

Po = Power output in KW

Load= Running Load in Percentage

Pi = Input Power to the motor in KW

Consider the case of Motor-1

Motor-1 ( 7.5 KW, Efficiency 86.88 % ):

(LEROY SOMER: 7.5 KW, 400 V, 50 Hz, Y, 14 A, P.F 0.89, 1455 RPM)

If the motor is running at 100 % Load Then Po = 7.5 Kw (Name Plate Rating), Pi =

1.732*400*14*.89 = 8.6322 KW and efficiency at 100 % load will be according to equation 86.88 which is correct.

Now if we take that motor is running at 90 % of its rated load then efficiency will be

Efficiency ( % ) = (7500/8632)*(0.9) = 78.19 %

It means that efficiency is the function of load

Waiting for Ur reply

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#6

Re: Induction Motor Efficiency Vs Its Power Factor

06/24/2010 9:15 AM

Yes, Its is true, the efficiency depends on the load of the motor. A no load motor will have a very bad efficiency because most of the power consumed will be the I2*R losses. Below is an extract of a book where the efficiency depending on the Power factor clearing the doubt which you raised in this thread: One often overlooked aspect of overall motor drive efficiency is the power factor. The power factor relates the shape of the current waveform drawn by a load to the sinusoidal voltage waveform supplied by the power company. If a load looks purely resistive, then the current drawn by the load is a sinusoid exactly in phase with the voltage waveform, and the power factor is unity (1). This is the most efficient condition. If the load appears to be inductive, as it does in many motors, the current will lag behind the voltage in phase, and the power factor will be less than one, according to the cosine of the phase angle. Capacitive loads, which cause the current to lead the voltage, also reduce the power factor below one. In either case, the energy supplied to the motor will not be used optimally. Since the peak (and shape) of the current sine wave does not line up with the peak of the voltage sine wave, the instantaneous product of voltage times current averaged over a full cycle is lower. This is called the true power and is measured in watts. Since the mains voltage is fixed, a higher current is required from the power company to compensate for the phase shift and deliver the same usable power to the motor, bringing the usable power (in watts) back up to the level required to do the desired mechanical work (in horsepower, for example).The product of this higher RMS current and the RMS voltage (measured in volt-amps) is called the apparent power. In many respects the power company has to build the infrastructure and pay for the higher apparent power, even though only the true power is doing useful work for the end user. This higher current means more losses as the power company generates and distributes the power. Power-line transformers can heat up and fail. Power losses go up as the square of the apparent power. A power factor of 0.7 means an apparent power of 1.4 times the true power, with nearly double the losses compared to a power factor of one.

Register to Reply
2
Anonymous Poster
#7

Re: Induction Motor Efficiency Vs Its Power Factor

06/25/2010 10:49 AM

I hope this helps you.

Motor Power Factor and Energy Conservation

Energy conservation is a hot topic these days and everybody "knows" that low power factor can mean waste of electrical energy. Many questions are asked about the power factor of induction motors. Some competitors stress the high power factor of their motors. Why don't we?

Induction motors are only one of the kinds of electrical equipment that tend to reduce a plant's power factor. And it's the overall plant system's power factor that counts. There are ways of correcting a low system power factor, so maximum motor power factor isn't vital. System power factor correction is often the better way.

A Quick Review of the Theory

True Power, measured in watts (W), is the power, drawn by the electrical resistance of a system, that does useful work.

Reactive Power, measured in volt-amperes, reactive, (VAR) is the power stored in and discharged by the inductive motors, transformers and solenoids all draw reactive power.

Apparent Power, measured in volt-amperes (VA) is the voltage on an AC system multiplied by all the current that flows in it. It is the vector sum of the true and the reactive power.

Power Factor, is the ratio of the true power used in a system to the apparent power drawn from the source. It's usually expressed in percent: W/VA x 100. The cosine of the angle between VA and W in this vector diagram ø is a measure of power factor. The larger the VAR current the lower the power factor.

Only the true power (W) in a system does useful work. But the utility has to generate and distribute what really flows: The apparent power (VA). Utilities usually only meter watts, but a utility can measure a plant's overall power factor and it's common to charge a rate penalty if that power factor is low. Within the plant, the power distribution system also has to be sized to distribute and switch the apparent power, not just useful watts. In short, the difference between useful power and apparent power, as indicated by power factor, represents power that does no work but costs the user money.

Why Not High Motor Power Factor?

As the diagram indicates, if the VAR vector is short, the power factor will be high. So it might seem that motors with high power factor will help, because they will contribute less to the overall system VAR vector. But... First: Motor load may not have much effect on system power factor. This is true when:

  1. Motor load is relatively small in comparison to resistance load (W) on the plant system, drawn by such equipment as plant lighting and resistance heating.
  2. Most of the induction motor load is represented by large, high-speed motors. Their power factor is inherently high, and the power factor of the fewer small motors won't mean much.
  3. The plant uses some synchronous motors. These don't increase the VAR vector shown in the diagram, they tend to decrease it.
  4. Motors are only part of the inductive load responsible for the length of the diagram's VAR vector. Almost any plant has some power transformers probably welding transformers, possible solenoid-operated mechanisms, and induction heating equipment. Also there is "stray inductance", in the plant's wiring and in theory these wiring systems are pure resistance loads.
  5. High motor power factor is wasted if the motor is oversized for the driven load, or runs much of the time at reduced load.

In the above situations a high motor power factor won't affect overall system power factor much. Probably not enough to justify the cost and other disadvantages of motors designed for maximum power factor.

Second: You don't get as good a motor design by concentrating on high power factor. The motor designer has to consider a number of parameters such as temperature rise, torque characteristics and efficiency, as well as power factor, and he can't optimize them all. It's costly to try to design both high power factor and high efficiency into a motor, and some of the design changes that improve power factor, such as a reduced air gap, actually have the opposite effect on efficiency.

The Better Way

No matter what motors do to a plant system power factor, it can be corrected, and that's the better way. The VAR vector in the diagram above represents inductive reactance. But there's also capacitive reactance, which produces an opposite VAR vector. If a system is being affected by both kinds of reactance, they tend to cancel each other. In the system vector diagram below, capacitive VAR's are almost as great as inductive VAR's so W more nearly equals VA, and W/VA x 100 -- the system power factor -- is high.

How:

Sometimes rotating capacitors are used to put capacitive reactance into a plant system, but static capacitors are more common. Maybe one central bank to correct the entire plant system, or a bank at each several plant load centers. Or, an individual capacitor installation at each motor. Which of these approaches is best for a given plant requires analysis of many variables, and we are not in a position to make general recommendations. A customer in doubt should contact the major capacitor manufacturers for detailed information and expert advice.

To Sum Up

Now you see why we don't go the highest-power-factor routed in motor design. Efficiency and other desirable characteristics have to be designed into the motor, because there's no good way -- external to the motor -- to get their effect. But the effect of motor power factor on plant system power factor, to whatever extent it has an effect, can be compensated for by external means and capacitors can improve power factor to 95-98%, a greater improvement than can be designed into a motor. External correction has the big advantage of correcting for the transformers and other equipment on the plant system that also tend to lower the power factor. With capacitors, a facility's system power factor can be "tailored" to match a utility's billing structure, so that the facility pays only for the degree power factor corrections that will really save money.

Home Email

Copyright © 2005 Emerson Electric Co. All rights reserved

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: BHOPAL, INDIA
Posts: 201
Good Answers: 20
#8

Re: Induction Motor Efficiency Vs Its Power Factor

06/25/2010 1:26 PM

The motor is designed to meet the requirements specified by the customer which include its torque, speed, type of enclosure, may be type of cooling and many more. Based on these factors designed makes his design. He attempts to make his motor as cost effective as possible by proper choice of materials and cooling methods.

Motor is made of magnetic materials (sheet steel) and copper. He can make motor more copper less steel combination or less copper more steel combination. Amount of copper decides copper losses and of amount steel decides iron losses.

Motor losses and be divided into two parts constant losses and load dependent losses. Lower the constant losses higher will be the efficiency of the motor. Constant losses include mechanical losses (bearing, brush, windage Fan losses) and the iron losses.

Why higher rating motors are more efficient? They are more efficient because they have lower percentage of mechanical losses (they have better cooling and therefore use less Kilogram of material per KW rated load).

Power factor is hardly a consideration for design of motor. As stated by many experts, power factor can be corrected out side the motor by suitable means. Motor has to have coils and the iron core and therefore it has to have inductive reactance, which cannot be eliminated under any circumstances. So designer is not bothered about its power factor. His interest is always to meet the customer specification at the lowest lost.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 729
Good Answers: 2
#9

Re: Induction Motor Efficiency Vs Its Power Factor

06/26/2010 10:00 AM

The comparisson of 2000kw motor with a 7.5Kw motor itself is not correct.The Higher the rating and RPM eff. is better.Higher speed motors like for example a2000kw 2or 4 pole compared to a 2000kw 6 or 8 pole will be more efficient due lower magnetizing current needed.Power factor will affect the eff as explained by other forum members.High efficiency and energy efficient motors are different.In energy eff. motors as per EURO EFF1 motors eff from 100 to 60% load is almost constant which is more important as motor maintains its eff close to full load eff even when there is a load fluctuation.Induction motors larger ratings like 5000kw and above have eff 96.5 to 97% to day.Power factor if needed can be corrected by adding capacitors of suitable rating.

__________________
To avoid crticism do nothing,say nothing,be nothing
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Register to Reply 9 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Aghvel Niazi (2); Anonymous Poster (3); JRaef (1); nesubra (1); pcchatur (1); Salar (1)

Previous in Forum: Calculate CT Burden   Next in Forum: How Do I Set Up Lowrey Organ Power Supply Project?

Advertisement