Previous in Forum: Beta 1 of Windows Vista released for testing   Next in Forum: Nevada facility generates current 4x the rest of Earth
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - Organizer Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2969
Good Answers: 33

"Catastrophic Failure" at Vermont Yankee

07/28/2005 8:20 AM

The Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant in Vernon, VT (USA) suffered what its owners have described to federal regulators as a "catastrophic failure" in its electrical switchyard. Fortunately, the emergency shutdown of the reactor that followed went according to the plant's design. Because of the quick shutdown, at one point on Monday the water level inside the reactor core dropped 7 feet, leaving another 7 feet to keep the nuclear fuel cool.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
The Feature Creep

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 990
#1

Worry

07/28/2005 8:57 AM

Nothing is scarier then the terms "catastrophic failure" and "nuclear power plant" used in the same sentence. Looks like a blow to the people who are pushing for more nuclear power plants to be built. Of course Yankee is older than dirt; newer ones would be much safer.

__________________
"The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet." -William Gibson
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 255
Good Answers: 2
#2

Re: Vermont Yankee Shutdown

07/28/2005 10:13 AM

This is the polar opposite of spin doctoring. An insulator just broke in the switchyard. Since insulators are basically the same make up as the clay elephants (or whatever) we made in 2nd grade, its not unreasonable to have one shatter form extreme environmental stresses. The problem is the use of the word "catastrophic" to describe the failure. Technically from an engineering viewpoint, the insulator experienced a catastrophic failure. The problem arises when the media mixes the word "catastrophic" with "nuclear power plant" that a generally naive public gets all riled up. The probem arises when the media mixes the word "catasprophic" with "nuclear power plant" and a generally naive public gets all riled up.

Register to Reply
The Feature Creep

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 990
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Vermont Yankee Shutdown

07/28/2005 10:35 AM

The problem was more of the fact the plant lost power for a while, and whether that was intended or accidental. Without the generators producing power none of the safety equipment or monitoring equipment worked.
"He disputed a characterization by NRC spokesman Neil Sheehan that the plant's "fast transfer" -- in which the reactor gets electrical power from the New England power grid to operate during an emergency even as it goes off-line itself -- didn't occur as it was supposed to."
That is what dropped the water level down so low (1/2 way). I do agree insulators will break, but a hot reactor needs to make sure that it still has water. The plant people claim the delay was intentional, and I have to assume they know what they are doing.

__________________
"The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet." -William Gibson
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 3 comments

Previous in Forum: Beta 1 of Windows Vista released for testing   Next in Forum: Nevada facility generates current 4x the rest of Earth

Advertisement