Previous in Forum: Electrical & General Consulting Firm   Next in Forum: Current & Voltage Transformer
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 5

33kV tape joint failure

11/24/2010 8:59 PM

I have recently encountered a 33kV tape joint failure due to insufficient insulation tape thickness at the point of failure.

The overall insulation tape thickness was only about 10mm on the side where the failure occurred. The instruction manual says a 15mm thickness. What I don't understand is, why the bottom portion of that joint has a thickness of 10mm but the top portion has 30mm, whereas the taping is done circumferentially? Below is the cross section showing the big difference:

As the jointer would normally measure the overall O.D. to determine that he has achieved the required insulation thickness, he wouldn't be able to foresee such big difference in thickness on different sides of the joint. I initially thought that this may be due to inconsistency in tape stretching by the jointer but is it true that the inconsistency can lead to such big difference? Anyone has encountered such phenomena before? Any thoughts?

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 348
Good Answers: 10
#1

Re: 33kV tape joint failure

11/25/2010 1:41 AM

While applying tape the jointer passes one hand below the cable to catch the tape roll at the other side, stretches the tape roll from below and while circumnavigating the cable periphery releases the tape roll across the cable to repeat the action again and again, thus quite naturally insulation thickness below the cable is of less thickness due to the stretch action which is not there at the top since the tape roll is frequently released.

This inconsistency of tape thickness is taken well care of by the safety margin and does not leads to failure. Failure could have been due to other factors like inadequacy of the stress cone.

There is no rule for the thickness to be 10 mm or 15 mm, standard practice is to apply insulating tape minimum up to the periphery of the outer most cable sheath, essentially with a slight bulge over the joint part (central part), further final layers of anhydrous tape and layer of sealant are applied.

__________________
Knowledge sharing is a WIN-WIN situation
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Member

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 5
#2
In reply to #1

Re: 33kV tape joint failure

11/25/2010 1:55 AM

Yup, I also quite agree that the thickness is still sufficient to prevent a fault. In fact the joint has been in service for a few years. I'm also not aware of any high PD issues in the cable. Could overloading of the cable or circulating current in the earth screen cause any deterioration or softening of the rubber insulation due to high temperature?

I'm not so sure about the stress cone, but the installation of stress control/ semi-conductive tapes were found to be as per manufacturer instruction. The same method has been in use in many other joints and this problem has never occured. The fault occured exactly in the middle of the connector length, quite far away from the edges where there are more electrical stresses.

Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 5
Good Answers: 1
#3

Re: 33kV tape joint failure

11/26/2010 3:05 AM

I have a feeling that the wrapping was not done at proper tension. As a result the initial thickness was more with less number of wraps (layers) and it was more or less equal on all sides. Due to the weight of the cable the portion under it got compressed with passage of time and as a result the opposite side the layers became slacker resulting in more thickness. A crosssection of the cut insulation should reveal this.

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 4)
Register to Reply 3 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

debasis.nandy (1); mountk2 (1); zuyao (1)

Previous in Forum: Electrical & General Consulting Firm   Next in Forum: Current & Voltage Transformer

Advertisement