Worst case scenario for a motor is when a running motor abruptly stalls.
Locked rotor current for design assessments is taken as six times the rated name plate value, this evaluation will give you the transverse force on the foundation bolts to go ahead with further resolution.
__________________
Knowledge sharing is a WIN-WIN situation
I didn't understand that either. More important IMHO is the maximum torque, typically 2 x rated torque at start-up, which the motor mountings and support structure must be able to take. But I doubt whether this is often allowed for specifically, if the mounting bolts are the right size for the holes you won't go far wrong.
For dynamic load when running at full speed, again I doubt whether anybody normally worries about it being significantly above the motor weight. The driven equipment might be different, but that wasn't asked.
Cheers......Codey
__________________
Give masochists a fair crack of the whip
I am too under the impression that dyanamic loads wont be higher than motor weight itself. But sometimes when we have a high voltage motors like upto 6MW motors, the dynamic loads cannotbe neglected.
I am looking to calculate these dymanic loads ...
__________________
One has to watch out for engineers - they begin with the sewing machine and end up with the atomic bomb. - Marcel Pagnol
A standard curve for a squirrel cage (SC) motor provides locked rotor torque to be 1.5 times, breakdown torque to be 2.5 times and pull-up torque at starting nearly 1.25 times the full load torque.
For small motors it is usual to neglect the dynamic component in consideration of driven equipment but motors tend to be larger ( say 3200000 hp!).
__________________
Knowledge sharing is a WIN-WIN situation
I don't understand the 2nd paragraph, please explain. And have you ever seen a 2.5 MW motor? I'm not sure what the biggest power station generators (steam turbine driven) produce, but I'd expect 2.5 MW to be good going.
Cheers.........Codey
__________________
Give masochists a fair crack of the whip