Heat Calculation in a Conductor

Aww shucks... never looked at it ... even though CR4 gives the option...

Sorry OP, convection i meant.

Now, that was just mean!

Thanks

But no, Lyn was right, stupid of me not to have noticed it even when i had 15 minutes to correct it....how can i get discipline in English from my young Indian engineers if i am not above reproach myself ?

I know that kvsridhar's language skills are beyond question, not to mention that I know he has a good sense of humor.

And what about poor ronald A.? He would likely be inclined to use the word conection when discussing heat in a conductor.

Happy Holidays.

Wow, that's high praise indeed, thank you kindly...

And a WONDERFUL CHRISTMAS and NEW YEAR to you and all others too

I was being half humorous and half reproachful to LL. The reason being is that you DO have a very good grasp of English and the identity of the letter omission was, by the context of your post, easily identified (conVection). In other words, "I knew what you meant" and his correction was unnecessary.

In fact, I found myself wondering "How does connection relate to heat in a conductor? It relates to heat in the termination, but it will only relate to the conductor heat for a short distance away from the connection..."

I did not extrapolate conVection from that!

Funny how the omission of one letter can cause all sorts of confusion.

Oh yes, how so little can make so much difference..

like "looking at her sternly" as opposed to "looking at her stern".. yes?

OR looking at her keel, I might add

_{I understood your pun}