Previous in Forum: Tektronix 465: What Was Cost New?   Next in Forum: Flow Element Selection
Close
Close
Close
12 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Associate

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 33

Temperature Measurements

03/03/2011 2:17 PM

Checking temperature with type J thermocouple wires "twisted together" or "soldered together". Does data exist comparing these two practices? Is error potential greater between the two practices when measuring temperatures up to 300 f? Thank you.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX USA
Posts: 844
Good Answers: 29
#1

Re: Temperature Measurements

03/03/2011 3:10 PM

Both methods work although some type of bonding for durability is a plus. Also, type J T/C's in particular are corrosion prone which can lead to an open circuit condition if just twisted together.

__________________
"Do not worry about your difficulties in Mathematics. I can assure you mine are still greater". - Albert Einstein
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - USA! Hobbies - Musician - Sound Man Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - More than a Hobby Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: City of Roses.
Posts: 2056
Good Answers: 101
#2

Re: Temperature Measurements

03/03/2011 4:13 PM

Use some good high temperature solder for the best result. As stated before, you can get away with simply twisting them together, but you are more susceptible to corrosion and loss of contact.

__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the Internet!
Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Not a New Member Hobbies - Musician - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Reading, Berkshire, UK. Going under cover.
Posts: 9684
Good Answers: 468
#3

Re: Temperature Measurements

03/03/2011 7:08 PM

The best lasting results would be obtained by welding. Not sure how - maybe zap them with a spot welder? pressure (a whack with a BIG hammer)? flame? - but it would eliminate any possibility of a poor contact between the two metals.

__________________
"Love justice, you who rule the world" - Dante Alighieri
Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#4

Re: Temperature Measurements

03/03/2011 9:00 PM

A search on "thermocouple welder" got many hits. From very casual looking around, prices seemed around US$ 1000-2000; maybe less if used. It looked like an argon-shielded mini spot welder using capacitive discharge.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1119
Good Answers: 11
#5

Re: Temperature Measurements

03/03/2011 9:09 PM

Most preferred if twisted & soldered together at end point. Just like the other guys are saying, mere twisting is prone to corrosion. As the cable insulation for two wires will be corroded, mere twisted wires contact with each other at somewhere farther up than end point(remember the reading will be at contact point). You might have an offset temperature point there(instead at end point). Thus you will be getting a lower reading than the point of you concern.

Think of this, what if, i put the two wire in your thermocouple in contact somewhere at the middle of the wire length, what will effect to the reading? Does it read still the end point of the wire or the reading of the middle.

Electrical current travels the shortest and the most accessible points, so when the wire comes in contact, the readings from you monitor will be right at the contact point.

__________________
" To infinity and beyond" - Buzz Lightyear
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: texas
Posts: 92
Good Answers: 8
#6

Re: Temperature Measurements

03/03/2011 9:54 PM

Hi,

We built some long thermocouples for sensing skin temperature of tubes in one of our heaters.We twisted the wires then we "melted" the wires together with an oxygen /acetylene torch. They have being is service for about three years without any problems.

Thank you

__________________
"The older I get -The better I was"
Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1
#7

Re: Temperature Measurements

03/04/2011 3:20 AM

Thermocouple materials whether Type J or any other should be "fused" together for greatest accuracy. Although if +/- 5 degrees is an ok tolerance then soldering or twisting will suffice but as has been mentioned, if only twisted, then corrosion will quickly turn +/- 5 into upscale burnout!! twist them together and fuse with an oxy set!!

Register to Reply
3
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1601
Good Answers: 58
#8

Re: Temperature Measurements

03/04/2011 7:45 AM

Twisting thermocouple wires is never considered good practice. How long a junction made this way will last depends on temperature and environment. Soldering is better, but not good in critical applications, especially when there are large thermal gradients involved. When you solder a TC junction, you are creating 2 junctions, thermocouple wire to solder, and solder to other thermocouple wire. Actial temperature measured will be the aveage of the two junction temperatures. Welded junctions are simple to make and the most reliable. Several welding technologies are in common use. We use both plasma and TIG welding, but many others are satisfactory.

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 3)
Power-User

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Moncks Corner, South Carolina, USA
Posts: 157
Good Answers: 6
#9

Re: Temperature Measurements

03/04/2011 8:35 AM

We used to use the arc of a TIG torch to weld them together. This eliminated any worry of changing characteristics due to foreign material contamination of the dis-similar metal joint.

__________________
You can always tell a Nuke because you can't tell him anything!
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 178
Good Answers: 4
#10

Re: Temperature Measurements

03/04/2011 9:41 AM

There is a method where a small ring is placed over the wire and squeezed. It is much like terminating a wire with a crimp connector.

__________________
Bill H.
Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 33
#11

Re: Temperature Measurements

03/04/2011 12:53 PM

All these answers are helpful. Thank you all very much.

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 23
#12

Re: Temperature Measurements

03/04/2011 1:27 PM

Soldered is better than twisted, but the best junction is to solder the 2 leads, untwisted as parallel lines seperated by a small gap on a metal plate. This is referred to in the aerospace industry as the "Moffat Junction Technique" & there is also the "Moffat Thermocouple (4 wires instead of 2)", that also uses this technique. Professor Robert J. Moffat (Standford University) is considered the Grandfather of Modern Day Thermometry.

To start your understanding, acquire a copy of his paper "The Gradient Approach to Thermocouple Circuitry". Bob has developed many practical techniques throughout his research. Bob was a guest lecturer for Peter K. Stein's "Measurement Enginerring" Short Courses, "Taking Valid Data On Purpose & Being Able to Prove It!" Bob opened my eyes to thermcouples 30+ years ago & his research & conclusions have stood the test of time. Paul Morgan, Engineered Measurement Systems.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Register to Reply 12 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

aussiesquid (1); Bill H. (1); JohnDG (1); Noudge79 (1); Paul Morgan (1); RDGRNR (1); rubberman (1); RVZ717 (1); Tornado (1); welderman (1); wrenchpuller (1); XNuke (1)

Previous in Forum: Tektronix 465: What Was Cost New?   Next in Forum: Flow Element Selection

Advertisement