Previous in Forum: Motors   Next in Forum: Alloy For Electrical Contacts
Close
Close
Close
15 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 75

Too Many RPM Not Enough Torque...

04/30/2011 3:48 PM

Hello all you, me again.

It will probably look like a stupid question for some of you, but for me it will be one less thing to wounder about. Can a 3 phases ind. motor be rewind with a different amount of poles to decrease the speed. You know what i mean, I have a normal or basic 1800 rpm motor, 0.75 hp, 36 slots stator, turning to fast for the application i want to do, wich would require torque more than any thing else. A lot of it.

I look for information about motor winding theory on the web and all over but it is not clear in my head that if i "make" a motor with the same electrical caracteristics i.e.:Amps, Volts etc and running for the same amount of time (power) but "displacing" half the revolutions, then it should be stronger, right ?

What is that i do'nt understand???

Thank you, Have a nice week end any way

__________________
Just for fun!
Register to Reply
User-tagged by 1 user
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1056
Good Answers: 88
#1

Re: Too many RPM not enough torque...

04/30/2011 4:52 PM

At 36 slots the max technically possible pole pair winding for 3-phase is 4. But even though you will end up with half the current speed (at 1800rpm 60Hz you now must have 2 pairs or four poles) you won't get any torque gain, i.e your horse power will be about half and even little lower since the cooling efficiency will drop and you'll have to derate some. And still not counting the rewinding cost. The way to go if you need more torque is by gear or belt speed reduction. S.M.

__________________
Life is complex. It has a real part and an imaginary part.
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster #1
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Too many RPM not enough torque...

04/30/2011 5:36 PM

And before somebody corrects me, 3 pairs or 6 poles is max and speed and power would be 2/3 of the current. Something wrong with that beer S.M.

Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 75
#4
In reply to #1

Re: Too many RPM not enough torque...

04/30/2011 5:37 PM

Thank you, Simplemind, i like the name, like it simple

But you gave me the wrong answers, just kidding...I guess you are right, need at least 2 slots to make a coil, so a max of 18 of them...3 phases=6. 6what? I still do not get it all.

OK... To use those 18 coils as a stepper motor make no sense? Why? Is the rotor of a stepper motor wound? I do not remember. Never mind.

No problem i am just back to plan "A", the wounderfull AC/DC serie motor,with controlled CEMF.

Are you still following me?

__________________
Just for fun!
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster #1
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Too many RPM not enough torque...

04/30/2011 5:39 PM

Got ya. Corrected before you. (LOL)

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: NYC metropolitan area.
Posts: 3230
Good Answers: 444
#2

Re: Too many RPM not enough torque...

04/30/2011 5:00 PM

Not stupid but intriguing, there really isn't much data on the web, but I found this...

http://www.pdhonline.org/courses/e176/e176content.pdf

Page 13 has the formula you seek, but exactly what type of motor do you have now? In particular is it a squirrel cage or wound rotor? I ask because I suspect that unless you have some way of rewinding the rotor you won't be able to change the number of poles and you'll be stuck at the design speed.

This book may answer more questions than you can ask....

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0131776916/ref=s9_simh_gw_p14_d2_i3?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=center-2&pf_rd_r=0300H44RGRZ76B7KKBBG&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=470938631&pf_rd_i=507846

As a last resort, you may find that running the output of the unmodified motor through a speed reduction (and therefore torque increasing) gearbox is cheaper than the time and effort you are going to expend otherwise, but it will be a great learning experience either way.

__________________
“Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.” Ben Franklin.
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 75
#7
In reply to #2

Re: Too many RPM not enough torque...

04/30/2011 6:13 PM

Hello RAMConsult, thank you also for your reply, Honestly i never tought so many people was welling to 'talk' about that tonight, it is great.

I undestand your point but i should clarified that i or should i said the motor physical size is limited to fit in a 6.5 in diameter sort of pipe. I am looking for a revolution of 30 RPM with controlled variation +/- 10. I already found a planetary gearbox 50:1.

The most important piece of information is that i have a lot of time and very little money, that is where the name come from PPP (patentage pour les pauvres,or poor boys enginneering, if you want) and as you mentionned a good electrothecnical experience.

Heu!! Yes Squirrel cage

__________________
Just for fun!
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster #1
#9
In reply to #7

Re: Too many RPM not enough torque...

04/30/2011 6:49 PM

Here's some 36 slot small motor I winded 6 pole years back just for the heck of it. It was single phase 3000 rpm 50Hz and worked occasionally on a VFD at up to 400Hz-8000 rpm (untill bearings died. Since I've no use for it nowdays never repaired it (actuall I didn't know I stil had it) I hope you can distinguish the windings every coil goes to one slot and then after two slots. And this at 3 layers.Every layer one slot off. So used 12 seperate coils 4 per phase connected in series on 1mm^2 wire and than painted with heat resistant black. Was it worth it? Propubly not If I had paid for materials, But the guy in the rewinding shop said he couldn't wind such a small motor and he prefered to give me the little copper I needed for free and not see it again S.M.

Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 75
#10
In reply to #9

Re: Too many RPM not enough torque...

04/30/2011 7:16 PM

OK I surely whish to be able to stay in touch with you.

It is very interesting, and maybe i should wait to comment the pulley size...

I have to leave, come back tomorrow

__________________
Just for fun!
Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Not a New Member Hobbies - Musician - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Reading, Berkshire, UK. Going under cover.
Posts: 9684
Good Answers: 468
#6

Re: Too many RPM not enough torque...

04/30/2011 5:39 PM

Should've done the sums first!

As I see it, to get high enough torque out of this at lower RPM, you have 3 options:

  1. Different motor
  2. Gearbox
  3. Fancy VF/VVVF drive

I suggest you research these to see which would be most cost-effective. Rewinding your motor is not an option.

__________________
"Love justice, you who rule the world" - Dante Alighieri
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 75
#8
In reply to #6

Re: Too many RPM not enough torque...

04/30/2011 6:40 PM

Hello you too!

Thank you for your concern, but it is too late, I have got them all...

my best motor so far is a DC permanent mag from a thread mill, i also bought last fall 2 VFD to improve my Smithy, and as mentionned the 50:1 planetary gear reducer( Eurodrive, a beauty...).

Beside the physical restriction, and been an electrician (not an engineer) i prefer SCR or other semiconducteur over a different size pulley. Please take no offenses.

It is all about improving.

__________________
Just for fun!
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster #2
#11

Re: Too many RPM not enough torque...

04/30/2011 11:07 PM

I think this might help you

sorry the letters are so small but if you are on windows use magnifier in accessories

Register to Reply
2
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA, where the Godless live next door to God.
Posts: 4665
Good Answers: 804
#12

Re: Too Many RPM Not Enough Torque...

05/01/2011 1:02 PM

"HP" is a short-hand expression of "X torque at Y speed". If you take the SAME motor and change the speed, you are going to either change the torque or change the HP. If you change the speed by virtue of a VFD, you are changing the HP, the torque remains the same. If you change speed by changing the number of poles and keep the HP the same, as speed drops, torque increases. Example (I'm using synchronous speed just to make the point):

Torque in lb.ft. = HP x 5250 / rpm

3/4HP 1800RPM torque = .75 x 5250/1800RPM = 2.1875 lb.ft.

3/4HP 300RPM torque = .75 x 5250/300 = 13.125 lb.ft.

But in order to get the same HP at 1/6 the speed, i.e. an INCREASE in torque, the motor windings will need to be a much larger physical size.

P (#of poles) = 120xf/RPM = 24Poles for 300RPM.

That's why when you look at a motor of a given HP and look at the 1800RPM compared to the 3600RPM version, the frames are often the same size, but if you look for an 8 pole motor of the same HP, the frame size is more than double. In other words there are physical limits to what you can do and maintain what you have. In practice if you were able to increase the number of poles that dramatically in the same frame, the flux return path for each pole would be so small that you will be unable to put much current through the windings and likely end up with LESS torque than you already have now.

Stick to the mechanical speed reduction, that's how you get to where you want to be. At 1/6 the speed you will have 6X the torque, minus a small percentage of friction losses in the gearbox.

If you want to read a decent paper on flux density and the number of poles, take a look at this. It's old (it says 1955 but I think it was supposed to say 1995), but still relevant. Pay particular attention to the last section on performance issues, your PF and efficiency will go out the window with that many poles as well, likely worse than any losses in a gear reduction.

__________________
** All I every really wanted to be, was... A LUMBERJACK!.**
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 75
#13
In reply to #12

Re: Too Many RPM Not Enough Torque...

05/03/2011 4:10 PM

Thank you very much

I have seen a lot of your comments on the forum, My hat off, for the time you take to share your knowledge.

__________________
Just for fun!
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 75
#14

Re: Too Many RPM Not Enough Torque...

05/03/2011 4:16 PM

One more time...

Which type of motor will produce the greater torque for same physical given diameter?

Serie...

__________________
Just for fun!
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - Born, raised halfway 'round .....

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Metro.Manila, Philippines.
Posts: 1268
Good Answers: 27
#15
In reply to #14

Re: Too Many RPM Not Enough Torque...

05/05/2011 9:56 AM

DC motor!

__________________
vsar
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 15 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (4); JohnDG (1); JRaef (1); RAMConsult (1); SimpleMind (1); TripppleP (6); vsar (1)

Previous in Forum: Motors   Next in Forum: Alloy For Electrical Contacts

Advertisement