Previous in Forum: Starting Time for Flood / Fluorescent Lighting Fixtures   Next in Forum: Why does Magnetic Saturation Cause More Losses?
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Commentator

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 80

Differential Protection for Transformer

08/11/2011 2:15 AM

Our customer insists on having a differential protection for their 2.5 MVA transformer.

Is there an international standard that oblige us to have differential protection for specific size of transformer?

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#1

Re: Differential Protection for Transformer

08/11/2011 2:25 AM

Irrelevant. If the customer wants this, you should be willing to supply it, though perhaps at additional price.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 80
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Differential Protection for Transformer

08/11/2011 6:30 AM

We don't have to supply anything customer wants, it's not a good engineering practice.

Because I think the transformer is to small to have a differential protection. I never saw transformer less than 10 MVA to have differential protection

Register to Reply
2
Associate

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: India
Posts: 29
Good Answers: 2
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Differential Protection for Transformer

08/11/2011 10:52 AM

I don't think any international standard says differential protection for specific transformer size.

In various projects, we never used differential protection for transformers below 5 MVA. For a 2.5 MVA transformer, standard protections + 'REF',at best, should suffice.

Infact, customer, needs to be told about "cost of protection equipment" v/s "cost of equipment to be protected". However, if customer still insists for 87T, go ahead as suggested by Tornado.

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Register to Reply 3 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

hbadhan (1); Local_Eng (1); Tornado (1)

Previous in Forum: Starting Time for Flood / Fluorescent Lighting Fixtures   Next in Forum: Why does Magnetic Saturation Cause More Losses?

Advertisement