In NC,USA I often see increased number of catastrophic cpu failures during the summer months attributed to lightning strike. However, true mother nature caused surges rarely have much opposition in the form of properly grounded or bonded arrestors installed. One fire system manufacturer lists a component for SLC use that the surge component manufacturer warns are still distributed for use in "legacy" FA systems ca. pre 1992. The voltage (nominal) and current (max) ratings are far too inadequate for latest generation of ultra transient sensitive FA systems. If an installer can muddle thru this confusion, then the application is usually faulty due to lack of proper survey of grounding system, impedance to said system and resistance limitations of FA system SLC/comm. ckts. Why is this not being addressed by NEC or NFPA 72 for manufacturer's listing vs surge device manufacturer's warranty compliance? Would forgoing system compat docs for surge component supplier's engineered recommendation be considered exceeding or ignoring protected system's listing? And am I way off base and these are considerations when accurately providing records for underwriters?