Previous in Forum: Nozzle Load   Next in Forum: Forklift Repair/Design Specs
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 14

Clarification for MAWP of the Vessel

08/28/2011 10:55 AM

Hello Everyone

I have another clarification regarding MAWP of the Vessel.

Using PVElite software to run the calculation, there is an option there for limiting MAWP, MAP, and User define Hydrotest Pressure.

My Client given me a design pressure of 16barg and he want it to hydrotest by 24barg (User Define Hydrotest).

1. Now my question is what should be my MAWP to put in the ASME Nameplate?

2. I have an option to limit the MAWP into design pressure so that i can met the requirement if UG-99b(Note34), but what about if my client does not agree and he want MAWP base from calculated one. Is there any conflict with ASME Code.

My hydrotest using UG-99b base on MAWP (Calculated) is higher than the User Define of 24barg.

It is acceptable by ASME Code?

Could anyone help me please

Thanks

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member Egypt - Member - Member since 02/18/2007

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Posts: 1733
Good Answers: 248
#1

Re: Clarification for MAWP of the Vessel

08/29/2011 12:09 AM

The client is requested to define exactly the MAWP (not design pressure) at vessel datasheet, and from which you can easily find the design pressure of each component of vessel, and also you can easily find the hydrostatic test pressure as specified by the design code.

See CR4 Thread: Governing MAWP - Nozzle Pad.ode

__________________
It is better to be defeated on principles, than to win on lies!
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 14
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Clarification for MAWP of the Vessel

10/26/2011 9:55 PM

Thanks Sir Abdel Halim & Sir Tornado

Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#2

Re: Clarification for MAWP of the Vessel

08/30/2011 1:21 AM

There may be a confusion between the design pressure of the process system and the design pressure(s) for a vessel to be used in the system.

For example, I work in ammonia refrigeration. For the refrigeration system, we might design for, say, a condensing pressure of 180 psig under normal operation. With start-up or higher ambient temperatures, there might be excursions to 210 psig. The vessels could be designed for this 210 pressure, but a common standard for ammonia high side vessels is 250 psig MAWP (maximum allowable working pressure).

If the vessel is tall and contains liquid, the pressure near the bottom will (because of liquid head) be still higher than the 250 MAWP. Thus some parts of the vessel may need to have a design pressure of perhaps 255 or 260 psig.

Thus it is possible for the design pressure of part of a vessel to be substantially higher then the design pressure of the system where it is employed.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 3 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Abdel Halim Galala (1); Tornado (1); yhinganetone (1)

Previous in Forum: Nozzle Load   Next in Forum: Forklift Repair/Design Specs

Advertisement