Previous in Forum: Polar 115   Next in Forum: Cummins Generator - Problems With Oil Cooler or Seals
Close
Close
Close
4 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Active Contributor

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 20

ASME VIII div 1 or 2

02/09/2012 11:57 AM

can you help me?

which is the difference about ASME VIII div 2 and div 1?

When do you use division 1? and when do you use division 2?

note:if is possible write in Spanish,

thanks

JUAN MARTIN ASATO KOBASIGAWA

STUDENT OF MECHANIC ENGIENIERING

ENGIENIERING UNIVERSITY

LIMA PERU

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
2
Power-User
Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 259
Good Answers: 29
#1

Re: ASME VIII div 1 or 2

02/09/2012 12:35 PM

Generally speaking; Division 2 requirements for materials, design, and nondestructive examination are more stringent than division 1, but allow for higher stresses.

Use Div 2 when it is desirable to decrease wall thicknesses mainly for weight considerations, but there may be other considerations.

__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Mineral wells Tx
Posts: 630
Good Answers: 34
#2

Re: ASME VIII div 1 or 2

02/10/2012 1:54 AM

Juan, yo sape un chiquito spañol. Additional a la respuesta de Moon te agrego que ASMO VIII tiene 3 div:

1. Div1

2. Div2 Alternative Rules

3.- Div3 Alternative Rules of High Pressure Vessels

Saludoos para Perú WP

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 377
Good Answers: 20
#3

Re: ASME VIII div 1 or 2

02/14/2012 10:43 AM
By chance simiilar quiry was there few months back. I am replicating same reply.

DISCUSSION ON ASME SECTION VIII DIVISIONS 1 AND 2 AND THE NEW DIVISION 3

(this is records of 3rd Annual Pressure Industry Conference, Banff, Alberta, Canada, held in February 1999)

Section VIII Division 1

Section VIII Division 2

Section VIII Division 3

"Unfired" Pressure Vessel Rules

Alternative Rules

Alternative Rules for High Pressure

Published

< 194019681997

Pressure Limits

Normally up to 3000 psigNo limits either way, usually 600+ psigNo limit; Normally from 10,000 psig

Organization

General, Construction Type & Material

U, UG, UW, UF, UB, UCS, UNF, UCI,

UCL, UCD, UHT, ULT

General, Material, Design, Fabrication

and others

AG, AM, AD, AF, AR, AI, AT, AS

Similar to Division 2

KG, KM, KD, KF, KR, KE, KT, KS

Design Factor

Design Factor 3.5 on tensile (4* used

previously) and other yield and

temperature considerations

Design Factor of 3 on tensile

(lower factor under reviewed) and other

yield and temperature considerations

Yield based with reduction factor for

yield to tensile ratio less than 0.7

Design Rules

Membrane - Maximum stress

Generally Elastic analysis

Very detailed design rules with Quality

(joint efficiency) Factors. Little stress

alaysis required; pure membrane

without consideration of discontinuities

controlling stress concentration to a

safety factor of 3.5 or higher

Shell of Revolution - Max. shear stress

Generally Elastic analysis

Membrane + Bending. Fairly detailed

design rules. In addition to the design

rules, discontinuities, fatigue and other

stress analysis considerations may be

required unless exempted and guidance

provided for in Appendix 4, 5 and 6

Maximum shear stress

Elastic/Plastic Analyses and more.

Some design rules provided; Fatigue

analysis required; Fracture mechanics

evaluation required unless proven leakbefore-

burst, Residual stresses become

significant and maybe positive factors

(e.g. autofrettage)

Experimental Stress

Analysis

Normally not requiredIntroduced and may be requiredExperimental design verification but may

be exempted

Material and Impact

Testing

Few restrictions on materials; Impact

required unless exempted; extensive

exemptions under UG-20, UCS 66/67

More restrictions on materials; impact

required in general with similar rules as

Division 1

Even more restrictive than Division 2

with different requirements.Fracture

toughness testing requirement for

fracture mechanics evaluation

Crack tip opening displacement (CTOD)

testing and establishment of KIc and/or

JIc values

NDERequirements

NDE requirements may be exempted

through increased design factor

More stringent NDE requirements;

extensive use of RT as well as UT, MT and PT.

Even more restrictive than Division 2;

UT used for all butt welds, RT otherwise,

extensive use of PT and MT

Welding and

fabrication

Different types with butt welds and

others

Extensive use/requirement of butt welds

and full penetration welds including nonpressure

attachment welds

Butt Welds and extensive use of other

construction methods such as threaded,

layered, wire-wound, interlocking stripwound and others

User

User or designated agent to provide

specifications (see U-2(a))

User's Design Specification with detailed

design requirements (see AG-301.1)

include AD 160 for fatigue evaluation

User's Design Specification with more

specific details (see KG-310) including

contained fluid data, etc with useful

operation life expected and others.

Designer defined

Manufacturer

Manufacturer to declare compliance in

data report

Manufacturer's Design Report certifying

design specification and code compliance in addition to data report

Same as Division 2

Professional

Engineer

Certification

Normally not requiredProfessional Engineers' Certification of

User's Design Specification as well as

Manufacturer's Design Report

Professional Engineer shall be experienced in pressure vessel design

Same as Division 2 but the Professional

Engineer shall be experienced in high

pressure vessel design and shall not sign

for both User and Manufacturer

Safety Relief Valve

UV StampUV StampUV3 Stamp

Code Stamp and

Marking

U Stamp with Addition markings

including W, P, B, RES; L, UB, DF; RT, HT

U2 Stamp with Additional marking

including HT

U3 Stamp with additional marking

denoting construction type; HT, PS, WL,

M, F, W, UQT, WW, SW

Hydrostatic Test

1.3 (Was 1.5 before the use of the 3.5

Design Factor in the 1999 Addenda)

1.251.25 (may be exempted for

autofrettaged vessels)

* In 1998, Code Cases 2278 and 2290 for ASME Section VIII Division 1 allowed for alternative maximum allowable design stresses based on a factor of

3.5 under certain provisions instead of a factor of 4 used by the Code. These code cases were incorporated into the Code in 1999.

Common Features:

Jurisdiction may have requirements in addition to Code

Mandatory Manufacturer's Quality Control System Implementation and Audit Requirements

Code Stamp Authorization through ASME Accreditation and Authorization

Authorized Inspection Agency in accordance with QAI

Authorized Inspector with Jurisdictional approval and certification

Manufacturer being held accountable for Code Stamp Application and full Code Compliance

NDE Personnel to SNT-TC-1A

Note: This brief comparative table is presented for discussion and does not represent the opinion of the ABSA, the ASME or the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Committees. Readers are advised to consult with the ASME Code Section VIII Divisions 1, 2 & 3 for details

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Active Contributor

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 20
#4
In reply to #3

Re: ASME VIII div 1 or 2

02/14/2012 12:46 PM

Thanks, I think you have the best commentary,because i need the difference of 3 divisions

Well thanks so much

JUAN MARTIN ASATO KOBASIGAWA

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Register to Reply 4 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

jasatok (1); Mukesh0861 (1); PMoon (1); Whitephone (1)

Previous in Forum: Polar 115   Next in Forum: Cummins Generator - Problems With Oil Cooler or Seals

Advertisement