Magnet - East & West Poles?

Just because. That's all!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth's_mag…

Its always Confusing to Me ?

Start here: http://www.school-for-champions.com/science/magnetism.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_monopole

You might try reading your Wiki reference before citing it for support. It has absolutely nothing to do with physical magnets, as in your postulate, "a bar magnet is cut in half".

If a bar magnet is cut in half, it is not the case that one half has the north pole and the other half has the south pole. Instead, each piece has its own north and south poles.????......

Just turn it sideways....

A magnet by definition is always dipole in nature, meaning two poles. You cannot have one pole without the other. The term north and south come from the fact that a magnet allowed to move freely, such as in a bowl floating on water, or balanced on a pinhead like a compass will line itself up in the earths magnetic field to point to the north and south pole direction, and perpendicular to east and west directions.

I have postulated a theory of the universe that does however use the terms east and west to describe mono-polar magnetism, depending on whether the associated electrical field is positive or negative.

JER's UNIVERSE EXPOUNDED

After re-reading Hawking's "A Brief History of Time"

I've got it all figured out. (Oh boy! Another idiot?)

I've decided that the rate of time is constant. Space itself is the fundamental unified field, and is a flowing medium. At distance equals zero from the event horizon of black holes space flows at the speed of light (the terminal velocity of the medium) into the center. Particle motion itself slows down, at right angles to the direction of travel, or in the dense regions of space (same difference because the densest regions have maximum flow) causing the illusion of time dilation. Particle motion stops at the speed of light (maximum density) because the Lorentz contractions cause the particles to flatten completely in the direction of travel, becoming two dimensional. All fundamental particles are the miniature black holes created in the early moments of the big bang. All of the fundamental massless field spins are the signature black body radiation emanating from these individual flavors of internally stabilized black hole formations. Gravity doesn't fit into quantum mechanics definitions, because gravity is not a field, but a symptom of space itself flowing into all matter, causing distance between all materialistic bodies to decrease. Apparent gravitational lensing is literal lensing caused by density changes in the flowing medium of space itself. There is no spectral separation because photons of any frequency propagate through a massless medium at the same rate.

Space is the zero sum field of equilibrium and is both the sync and source of all other fields. Thus all fields arise in pairs, of equal and opposite energy.

Using the electro-magnetic field as an example; if a single photon is the only thing in a universe it is a massless hole in space of definite energies in both the electric field and the magnetic field at right angles to each other. Before it exists, there is no time because space is at equilibrium. Nothing is flowing, and nothing is measurable. All of space is at the same density everywhere, existing only as potential (I call this eternity). The instant our photon comes in to existence (little bang) space begins to flow from distance equal zero from the event to distance equals infinity. This is also the beginning of time because we can now measure space against itself, and every point in space is different from every other point in speed and direction. When measuring anything against itself, we measure it through time. Space returns to its natural state of equilibrium by filling this hole in space from the center and distributing the energy outward, now a tear in space, in a single spherical pulse of electro-magnetic radiation diminishing its energy through time. At time equal infinity the electro-magnetic energy is reduced to zero, returning space to the original equilibrium. The photon is gone, time ends, and eternity awaits any other event.

Now consider a single point source electric charge, a single electron. The electron radiates its negative electric field. But wait! Where is the equal and opposite field energy. By definition, it must exist. We know that an electric charge in motion causes a circulation in the magnetic field at a right angle to the direction of travel in our current universe. However, our electron exists in the universe by itself, so where is the magnetic field. From time equal zero, as the electric field radiates in an ever expanding sphere at the speed of light, the associated magnetic field exists only on the edge of the growing sphere, and charges in energy equal to the overall energy of the growing electric field. The source of this energy is space itself flowing in toward the center of the point source charge transforming into the electro-magnetic fields. As the electric field flows outward it presses against the magnetic field causing back pressure from all direction of equal force, thus motion of the point source charge remains zero.

Applying particle field theory to the growing electrical field, these electrical field particles cannot cause circulation to the magnetic field because of adjacent field particles counter balancing the forces of circulation, but adding energy nonetheless. This magnetic field therefore is mono-polar in nature (neither north nor south). Let's call it "west" for a negative electric charge and "east" for a positive electric charge keeping to the common metaphor.

Now let's allow for two electrons to come in to existence simultaneously, some distance apart. At time equal zero; these two point sources will have relative motion toward one another (gravitational illusion), because space is flowing into each of them, thus diminishing distance. Until the spheres grow large enough for the magnetic fields to come in contact with one another there is actually no real motion of either particle. They are remaining stationary within their own spheres of backpressure at equilibrium. Both particles are just being carried along with the point of space in which they originated (dark matter).

At some point in time, each sphere grows large enough to come in contact with the other sphere at some point in space. Each sphere now has a point on their surface at twice the "west" magnetic field energy, disrupting the backpressure equilibrium imparting real motion in space. As each sphere continues to grow, this point on each sphere grows as a circle of more intense "west" magnetic field energy, increasing the speed of real motion caused by the increasing disruption of backpressure equilibriums. Eventually, the real motion in the opposite direction of the relative motion will reduce apparent motion to zero. However, the spheres will continue to grow, so the apparent motion changes in the same direction as real motion and continues to increase in speed.

In a universe containing two positrons instead of electrons, the electric fields are now positive, the magnetic fields are "east" in nature. The results of real, relative, and apparent motion are the same.

Now let's look at a universe replacing only one charge with its opposite. When the spheres grow to the point at which they come in contact what happens? A single point on each sphere now results in equal and opposite field energies of "west" and "east" magnetism as well as positive and negative electricity that cancel and change back into space (dark energy). New space is actually being returned to the universe at this point. This causes the relative motion to decrease in speed by injecting new space between the original points of space in which the particles originated. The point of contact on each sphere grows to the circle of new space. The backpressure equilibriums of each sphere however is lost and causes apparent and real motion toward the new space overcoming the inverse relative motion (dark energy) in runaway fashion until the distance between the particles becomes zero and they annihilate each other. Thus returning the universe to its natural state of equilibrium as the remainder of the electro-magnetic fields dissipate again at time equal infinity, similar to the original photon example this theory presented.

All of the other materialistic particles and field spins in the standard quantum model obey these same laws.

All we need now is a mathematician grad student willing to re-write all of the current particle physics equations of quantum mechanics without prejudice in these terms, fixing the rate of time and the speed of light as constant, allowing space to flow, not just warp, and allow particles and light to travel at variable "apparent" rates dependent on "density/flow rate" of space. This will result in a grand unified ætheral theory of the universe, along the lines of Hendrik Lorentz's original train of thought I imagine he had (before including the time adjustment) when he came up with the exact same transformation equations Einstein did.

JERRY LEE COLEMAN JR.

That's it above in a nutshell (nut's hell), with elaborated reasoning listed below.

In 1865 James Clerk Maxwell published his findings that light is an electro-magnetic wave that propagates through space as a wave at a definite speed. If light is a wave, then what is waving? It was thought to be the Luminiferous Æther. In 1887 Albert Michelson and Edward Morley devised an in ingenious experiment to finally measure the Luminiferous Æther by measuring the speed of light at a right angle to the direction of travel compared to the speed of light in the same direction of travel. Until this time it was thought that the Luminiferous Æther was the medium that light and gravity traveled through. To everyone's amazement they discovered that the speed of light through this medium was the same no matter what direction you are traveling. Unfortunately, this experiment leads the entire physics community to abandon the concept of the Æther all together, deciding that the electric field and the magnetic field just push one another along through a vacuum. No medium is needed. Ever since we have been struggling to explain gravity, and fit it in to the standard model of quantum physics.

In the early 1890's Hendrik Lorentz wasn't bothered too much by the results of the Michelson - Morley experimental results, and explained it away by attributing the result to the contraction of matter in the direction of travel through the Æther. He came up with the theory of special relativity that included his famous transformation equations. He was interested in the nature of light, much like Einstein, but did not abandon the concept of the Æther until later in the decade. He was our last great scientist to embrace the idea that if there are waves, some medium must be waving.

Einstein adopted much of his work on special relativity and came up with these exact transformation equations independently (so he said) and later discovered Lorentz's equations were the same. He took this as evidence that he was on the right track. Both included the concept of time dilation to explain confirmed scientific observations in a nonexistent Æther. Lorentz too abandoned the idea of the Æther when time dilation could explain observation. Einstein went on to manipulate every variable necessary to keep the speed of light constant for all observations.

Since then quantum and astral physics have discovered that the vacuum is not empty at all, gravity just will not fit into the standard model, there is stuff call dark matter gravitation that Einstein general relativity won't explain, and the weirdest thing of all is dark energy causing the expansion of the universe to expand faster. But everyone still refuses to re-consider that maybe the Æther is real, and Lorentz was on the right track in the first place. I liken this to a fool who lost his keys in a dark alley, but has everyone helping to find them under the main street lamp post because the light is better there.

If Einstein can take a single observational concept and twist the math around, convincing everyone that space warps and time dilates to fit the knowledge of his time, why can't we go back to where Lorentz actually lost his keys? Maybe we can use them to unlock all of the know mysteries of our time. Just because you cannot measure something, does not mean it does not exist. We are spending tremendous effort with our mathematical theories that we can never test. Let's spend some effort on this theory I set forth here and twist some math to fit the possibility I may be on to something here. The rate of time and the speed of light are constant, and "apparent" particle motion and speed of light vary with density of a flowing medium.