Previous in Forum: Fuel for Furnace + Efficiency Increase   Next in Forum: Comparing Carbon Steel and Other Materials For the Transport of Acetone
Close
Close
Close
11 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3

Visual Difference SS 316 and SS 904

04/24/2012 4:36 AM

I wanted to know, is it possible to visually see the difference between SS 316 and SS 904 material. Or is there any practical way to check whether a material is SS 316 or SS 904.

Thank you and Regards,

Dinar

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
5
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#1

Re: Visual Difference SS 316 and SS 904

04/24/2012 10:39 AM

No you can't tell the difference. Neither can your wrist watch.

From: forums.watchuseek.com/f6/904-vs-316l-88092.htmlCached - Similar

904L Stainless Steel:

< 0.02% C, 19-23% Cr, 23-28% Ni, 4-5% Mo, <2.0% Mn, <1.0% Si, <0.045% P, <0.035% S, 1.0-2.0% Cu

904L is a non-stabilised low carbon high alloy austenitic stainless steel. The addition of copper to this grade gives it greatly improved resistance to strong reducing acids, particularly sulphuric acid. It is also highly resistant to chloride attack - both pitting / crevice corrosion and stress corrosion cracking. This grade is non-magnetic in all conditions and has excellent weldability and formability. The austenitic structure also gives this grade excellent toughness, even down to cryogenic temperatures.
904L does have very substantial contents of the high cost ingredients nickel and molybdenum. Many of the applications in which this grade has previously performed well can now be fulfilled at lower cost by duplex stainless steel 2205 (S31803 or S32205), so it is used less commonly than in the past.

316L Stainless Steel

< 0.03% C, 16-18.5% Cr, 10-14% Ni, 2-3% Mo, <2% Mn, <1% Si, <0.045% P, <0.03% S

Grade 316 is the standard molybdenum-bearing grade, second in importance to 304 amongst the austenitic stainless steels. The molybdenum gives 316 better overall corrosion resistant properties than Grade 304, particularly higher resistance to pitting and crevice corrosion in chloride environments.
Grade 316L, the low carbon version of 316 and is immune from sensitisation (grain boundary carbide precipitation). Thus it is extensively used in heavy gauge welded components (over about 6mm). There is commonly no appreciable price difference between 316 and 316L stainless steel.
The austenitic structure also gives these grades excellent toughness, even down to cryogenic temperatures.
Compared to chromium-nickel austenitic stainless steels, 316L stainless steel offers higher creep, stress to rupture and tensile strength at elevated temperatures.

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 5)
Power-User

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 397
Good Answers: 3
#4
In reply to #1

Re: Visual Difference SS 316 and SS 904

04/25/2012 8:26 AM

Spark test won't do?

oilcan13

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Visual Difference SS 316 and SS 904

04/25/2012 8:37 AM

Never tried it. My initial response is no.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: "Dancing over the abyss."
Posts: 4884
Good Answers: 243
#10
In reply to #1

Re: Visual Difference SS 316 and SS 904

04/26/2012 10:13 PM

Actually using an Xray fluorescence analyzer for copper ought to do it quite easily. Here's a pdf that explains how to sort similar grades by properly setting elemental maxima minima: http://instruct.uwo.ca/earth-sci/xrfcourse/20th%20Anniversary%20Symposium/Talk%2005%20-%20Jim%20Stachowiak%20-%20New%20Advances%20and%20Applications%20using%20X-ray%20Fluorescence%20Analyzer%20for%20Metals%20Testing%20in%20the%20S.pdf Milo

__________________
People say between two opposed opinions the truth lies in the middle. Not at all! Between them lies the problem, what is unseeable,eternally active life, contemplated in repose. Goethe
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#11
In reply to #10

Re: Visual Difference SS 316 and SS 904

04/26/2012 10:20 PM

No doubt there are ways to analyze the two steels. I'm not sure anybody a layman like me can look at them and tell the difference.

Cheers.

Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
#2

Re: Visual Difference SS 316 and SS 904

04/24/2012 9:49 PM

Thank you , Lyn.

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 19
#3

Re: Visual Difference SS 316 and SS 904

04/25/2012 6:29 AM

I have come to learn

Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 70
Good Answers: 6
#6

Re: Visual Difference SS 316 and SS 904

04/25/2012 9:06 AM

Look into portable alloy analyzers. These are hand-held devices that register the response signature from all of the elements in the metal and report a % composition for all the elements. There are two types. One is XRF (X-Ray Fluorescence), which involves a radioactive source and can't report Carbon or small elements; however, it is the most common and comes in a pistol-like form. The other is a kind of spark / spectrometer that comes in a small suitcase and probe form. Either will be able to tell the difference between 316 and 904.

They're a bit expensive, but are probably cheaper than confusing the alloys. They are also non-destructive.

The other alternative is to cut a sample and have it tested.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 706
Good Answers: 32
#7

Re: Visual Difference SS 316 and SS 904

04/25/2012 10:30 AM

Here is a possible method:

"Austenitic Grades

All austenitic grades have very low magnetic permeabilities and hence show almost no response to a magnet when in the annealed condition; the situation is, however, far less clear when these steels have been cold worked by wire drawing, rolling or even centreless grinding, shot blasting or heavy polishing. After substantial cold working Grade 304 may exhibit quite strong response to a magnet, whereas Grades 310 and 316 will in most instances still be almost totally non-responsive.

The change in magnetic response is due to atomic lattice straining and formation of martensite. In general, the higher the nickel to chromium ratio the more stable is the austenitic structure and the less magnetic response that will be induced by cold work. Magnetic response can therefore be used as a method for sorting grades of stainless steel, but considerable caution needs to be exercised."

You might want to buy a Gaussmeter and experiment with know pieces to see if you can establish a difference between the 2 alloys.

__________________
Spinco
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 507
Good Answers: 3
#8

Re: Visual Difference SS 316 and SS 904

04/25/2012 10:36 AM

XRF PMI

__________________
I went to Texas A&M, I am proud to be an Aggee. Proud to be an Aggey, Proud to be an Agie.............Proud to have gone to Texas A&M.
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
#9

Re: Visual Difference SS 316 and SS 904

04/26/2012 3:35 AM

SS 316 harder then SS 904

SS 316 - 95 HRB

SS 904 -70...90 HRB

Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Register to Reply 11 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

dinar (1); Lawrence (1); lyn (3); Milo (1); oilcan13 (1); ronclarke (1); Spinco (1); strongcrusher (1); Vad (1)

Previous in Forum: Fuel for Furnace + Efficiency Increase   Next in Forum: Comparing Carbon Steel and Other Materials For the Transport of Acetone

Advertisement