We have designed bored piles of diameters ranging from 500mm to 1000mm for a six storied building.
The soil conditions at the site is a loosely compacted lateritic soil for a depth varying from 2 to 3 meters, underlain by black peaty material (SPT=0) and highly weatherd gneissic material (about 1 meter) followed by fairly sound biotite gneiss / quarts rock mass. The depth to rock varies from 10 to 18 meters and the allowable bearing recommended by the Geotechnical Engineer was 5000 KN/M2.
In the design we assumed a negative friction due to the peat layer and the loosely compacted fill material above it.
However, during pile dynamic testing, the CAPWAP anlysis always gave skin friction component of the mobilised capacity of more than 50%. In one of the piles tested (pile diameter 600mm and total length of 12.588m), the toe load was shown as 9 tons and the skin friction was shown as 102 tons. The pile was socketed to a depth of 500mm in to the sound rock. The rammer weight was 4.5 tons and the observed stroke was 1.5m.
My questions are:
1. How can one explain such a low toe contribution as against a fairl high skin friction?
2. As I understand the negative friction is a long term process and how far can we be serious about the high skin friction component created by an impulsive force and as shown by the CAPWAP analysis?
3. Can we completely the reverse the design criterion of assuming negative friction on the results of the dynamic testing?