Previous in Forum: Alternator Windings   Next in Forum: Earth Fault in 6.6KV Motor
Close
Close
Close
10 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Active Contributor

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 22

Transformer Insulation Failed

09/14/2012 12:30 AM

MV current transformer insulation got failed due to this protection relay got burnt.what could be the reason for this & also how to avoid this . Regards Murali

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: India
Posts: 1246
Good Answers: 34
#1

Re: Electrical

09/14/2012 1:05 AM

One possible cause, for breakdown of MV current transformer insulation is high temperature operation, over a prolonged period of time.

Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#2

Re: Electrical

09/14/2012 3:49 AM

Another possible cause is that the circuit failed open somewhere, and the induced voltage that occurred as a result was just simply too much for the poor little thing to withstand.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: India
Posts: 1246
Good Answers: 34
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Electrical

09/14/2012 4:01 AM

Poor little thing. May it's soul rest in peace!

Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#5
In reply to #3

Re: Electrical

09/14/2012 5:31 AM

Indeed.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
4
Power-User

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 390
Good Answers: 82
#4

Re: Electrical

09/14/2012 5:08 AM

A current transformer has a high voltage step-up winding ratio, N, which in use becomes a high current step-down ratio, 1/N. Current transformers are always fitted with a secondary current-sensing load resistor, RS, typically 0.1 ohm, 1 ohm, etc., and the current-carrying wire passed through the primary appears to have an AC resistance of RS / N2, which is ideally a very small value, easily micro-ohms. In this fashion it causes little voltage drop Vp = Ip RS / N2, and wastes very little power P = Vp Ip, and has an insignificant effect on the system it's measuring.

If the CT's load resistor (or burden) ever becomes disconnected, and normal operating ac line current is passed through it, the CT simply becomes a high-voltage step-up transformer and all hell can break loose. A step-up ratio of 1:100 to 1:1000 or more is common, and this implies that at least 115vac*100, etc. = more than 10kV will appear across the secondary. But we know the secondary winding insulation (with a typical magnet-wire insulation rating of say 300 volts) will quickly fail as the voltage soars toward such a high value.

The photo below shows a bus-bar ground-fault current transformer with a melted section. It was said the secondary was left open. Properly treated, current transformers are not under much stress; they are not doing any real work. They should last forever.

It's imperative that a CT always have a connected load resistor. In the best case it should be permanently attached. (But this could mean its value cannot be easily changed, hence the manufacturer's motivation to leave connecting a load resistor up to the user. So user beware, DANGER! Don't forget to well-connect a load resistor! Soldering it permanently in place would be a good idea.)

Another caution is not to use too low a power rating for the secondary load current-sense resistor. You MUST NOT EVER let that resistor fail! Hell, now I'm thinking it should be two resistors in parallel.

In closing, here's another example of what can happen if you leave the secondary open.

__________________
Thanks, Win
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 4)
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: India
Posts: 1246
Good Answers: 34
#6
In reply to #4

Re: Electrical

09/14/2012 7:44 AM

Am I wiser? Very educative! Thank you Win.

Register to Reply
2
Guru

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Liverpool, NY
Posts: 961
Good Answers: 131
#7
In reply to #4

Re: Electrical

09/14/2012 11:37 AM

In electrical switchgear and apparatus, that resistor is normally NOT discrete. It is part of the load or burden that is connected in the CT circuit: a meter, protective relay, current transducer, etc. You will not find it in the wiring diagrams or physically connected in the scheme. That is why it is imperative that the CT circuit be kept continuous; there should be no fuses, test switches, or other means of opening the circuit during operation. The utility for which I work even stipulates that wiring for CT circuits be wired with ring-type crimp terminals on the wires rather than fork terminals, to make it less likely that a loose screw lead to an open circuit and a failure. So while your explanation of what happens is correct, in electrical service apparatus you will not find such a resistor as a discrete device.

__________________
To get the right answers, first you need to ask the right questions.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Power-User

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 390
Good Answers: 82
#8
In reply to #7

Re: Electrical

09/14/2012 12:14 PM

Thank you for pointing that out. For switchgear and other high-power applications we'll be careful to substitute burden for load resistor.

Normally the developed voltage across the burden is quite low. I wonder if it wouldn't be a good idea to have a pair of paralleled back-back diodes (or series back-to-back zener diodes if more than +/-0.3V is necessary) permanently-soldered on the CT leads, to limit the secondary voltage in the event of a downstream burden disconnect. In such a fault event, the diodes would dissipate less than 1/2 watt, and the primary-side voltage drop would rise, but typically still be under 1 mV. Without a fault disconnect the diodes would have no effect.

__________________
Thanks, Win
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1895
Good Answers: 44
#9
In reply to #4

Re: Electrical

09/14/2012 4:45 PM

I love your posts. You need to help us out here more often!

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: srilanka
Posts: 2725
Good Answers: 5
#10

Re: Transformer Insulation Failed

09/15/2012 1:15 AM

For a heavy short circuit or fault there might have been a high current in CT which burnt the winding because CB failed to trip.

__________________
pnaban
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 10 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

cuba_pete (1); Joshi (3); PeterT (1); pnaban (1); PWSlack (2); Winfield Hill (2)

Previous in Forum: Alternator Windings   Next in Forum: Earth Fault in 6.6KV Motor

Advertisement