I believe one type of cost effective solar heater for water could be described as below. This design is for tropical and subtropical applications.
My question to the folks at CR4 is ----
Is it possible to circulate the heated water through an elevated storage tank using the thermodynamic force (right word?) generated by the thermal gradient between the water in the collector and water in the storage tank or will an inline pump be required?
Thoughts on Building a Cost Effective Solar Water Heater
I believe that a cost effective solar hot water collector could be built as a shallow rectangular box with the sun exposed surface made out of a high thermal conductive material, such as thin steel plate. The thin steel plate would be made non-reflective as possible; perhaps using a VERY Thin coat of black paint.
Only the collector plate needs to be of high thermal conductive material; but the system will be under some pressure so the seals must be good, strong, and not sensitive to thermal stress.
The collector would need to be assembled in such a manner that the collecting surface would be in constant contact with the water.
The collector would have attached pipes for the inlet, outlet, and circulation return pipe.
The inlet pipe would be from the pressurized water system, protected with a check valve, to the collector at its lowest point.
Water would be fed into the system where it would absorb heat from the collector plate; and then circulate through an elevated and insulated storage tank via the collector outlet and circulation return.
If the thermodynamic force is not great enough for optimum circulation, then a small electronically controlled inline pump, powered by a small solar panel, could force circulate the water between the collector and storage tank. I think this can be done without the inline pump and am running it by the folks at CR4.
The piping, storage tank, and sides/bottom of the collector should be insulated.
The collector outlet pipe would be plumbed from the highest point in the collector to the storage tank. The circulation return pipe would be from the bottom of the storage tank to the lowest point in the collector. When there is a significant difference in temperature between the collector and storage tank; the water should circulate between the collector and storage tank. It should stop circulating when the water temperature in the collector is at or below the water temperature in the water tank
An outlet from the top of the storage tank could then feed a heater or be plumbed directly to the faucet. If the water is hot enough the electric heater will not have to turn on; or if it does, for a much shorter period.
I believe the collector should be aligned due north or south, depending on what hemisphere, and tilted at an angle equal to geographic latitude.
The collector could be made out of welded thin steel sheets; using less expensive poly tanks for storing the hot water.
The steel sheets should be joined so that the collector is shallow and the area exposed to the sun is the greatest possible. A good wielder/plumber could put connections in the collector for the piping.
.
Mount the INSULATED storage tank elevated above the collector. Connect the Inlet to your water supply, and the outlet and return to the storage tank. Run an outlet pipe from the top of the storage tank to the electric or gas heater or directly to the faucet line. Insulate your hot water pipes if possible. The water should flow form the inlet, through the collector, through the storage tank, into the electric heater or directly to the faucet.
Here are what I believe the numbers look like at 35 cents / KWH.
A collector of 4 square meters would collect about .3 * (5.5)* 4 = 6.6.KWH per day in thermal energy at 30 percent efficiency based on an average Insolation Rate of 5.5 KWhr/SQM/Day. I used the insolation rate for Honolulu. ( For your location get your insolation rates and plug that number into (5.5) figure.) The .3 is the efficiency coefficient (30 percent), the 5.5 is the insolation rate in KWH per square meter per day, the 4 is the collecting area in square meters.)
At $.35 * 6.6 = $2.31 a day: $2.31 * 365= $843.15 / year.
This looks like $843.15/4 = $210.78 per square meter of collector; if you can use all the hot water.
30 percent efficiency may be a low figure for a properly designed appropriate technology Thermal Solar Collector. Is it possible that the thermal efficiency of this system may be significantly higher than 30 percent?
"Almost" Good Answers: