Previous in Forum: ASME Section VIII Hydrostatic Test, Pressure Gauge   Next in Forum: Combining ISO 16949 After Implementing TQM
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Anonymous Poster #1

CPK

03/21/2013 10:16 AM

Will I ever be able to achieve a 1.33 CPK when I always have to run to one side of the mean?

Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Anonymous Poster #2
#1

Re: CPK

03/21/2013 10:26 AM
Reply
Anonymous Poster #3
#2
In reply to #1

Re: CPK

03/21/2013 11:56 AM

Very helpful, AP#2.

Here - this may be of use: Process capability

Reply
Member

Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 6
Good Answers: 2
#4
In reply to #2

Re: CPK

03/21/2013 1:17 PM

Thanks, that verifies what I was thinking.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Haverhill, MA
Posts: 1149
Good Answers: 151
#3

Re: CPK

03/21/2013 12:54 PM

Calculations commonly used for Cpk assume that the process variation has a normal distribution which is symmetrical about the process mean. I your case, where you must maintain the process on one side of the mean, the process does not have a normal distribution. In this case the calculation of the process capability must be calculated from the the probability density function of your particular process. This will require someone with more expertise in statistics than me.

__________________
The older I am, the better I used to be
Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: City of Light
Posts: 3943
Good Answers: 183
#5

Re: CPK

03/22/2013 5:40 AM

Could you better explain what you have as process since if you have a mean value you have values on both sides of it.

The CPK gives an indication about the eccentricity of the distribution and is a measure of the probability to have values out of tolerance interval even if the distribution is narrow with respect to the tolerance field. It does not loose its meaning even if you work on one side since the eccentricity can be such that values come out of range.

The CAM measures how narrow the distribution is with respect to the whole tolerance field. Both parameter indicate the risk to get scrap.

Reply
Reply to Forum Thread 5 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (2); gringogreg (1); nick name (1); Quality Girl (1)

Previous in Forum: ASME Section VIII Hydrostatic Test, Pressure Gauge   Next in Forum: Combining ISO 16949 After Implementing TQM

Advertisement