The very basic principles of RC HPF's tell us that all else equal the
frequency and the value of the capacitance are inversely related. This
suggests that the largest acceptable capacitance value should be much
less for the higher frequency HD video then that of SD. However, after
conducting many tests using the pathological test (PLL test simply
strings 20 bits in a row together of 1's then 0's instead of having a
transition every bit, effectively reducing the frequency in both SD and
HD by the same factor) we have found some different results. The
largest acceptable capacitance values that do not kill the signal were
MUCH lower for SD (1 micro compared to 4.7) than they were for HD. This
seems to contradict first principles of HPF's, so what else is could be
going on?
Any insight is greatly appreciated.