Previous in Forum: An EE "Whodunit" . . .   Next in Forum: LT Mainline Design
Close
Close
Close
4 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Anonymous Poster #1

Tap Rules

02/01/2014 2:56 AM

10 ft tap:

tap conductor -> 10% of main ocpd

25 ft tap:

tap conductor -> 1/3 of main ocpd

outside tap:unlimited length

tap conductor -> no sizing required?

So, in a 400A main, I can make an outside tap of unlimited length using 14AWG and then terminate on 20amps cb?

But, I can't do it if my tap is inside and less than 25 ft?

I don't get the rationale of the outside tap rule. Could someone clarifies? Thanks.

Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: by the beach in Florida
Posts: 33392
Good Answers: 1817
#1

Re: Tap Rules

02/01/2014 8:21 AM

It has to do with the locations of the disconnect mechanisms for feeder lines....what part don't you understand?

http://www.mikeholt.com/mojonewsarchive/NEC-HTML/HTML/FeederSecondaryTapRules~20020326.htm

__________________
All living things seek to control their own destiny....this is the purpose of life
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#2

Re: Tap Rules

02/01/2014 10:11 AM
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern Kansas USA
Posts: 1503
Good Answers: 128
#3

Re: Tap Rules

02/02/2014 5:31 PM

You are getting into the rationale--the code's purposes are protection of property against fire and protection of people from injury. Outside taps are (by the rules in the code that define "outside") very unlikely to do either of these. The wire in your question can easily have a failure, but is very unlikely to cause either a fire or an injury. Thus the very permissive nature of this rule.

--JMM

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1686
Good Answers: 116
#4

Re: Tap Rules

02/02/2014 6:06 PM

I realize that you are discussing US practice here, but it may help to describe the rules which have applied in UK since 1981[and rest of EU].

These are "principal" based, rather a practical "rulebook" and the following apply to a tap or tee of a low rated conductor direct onto a higher rated conductor. The following is my own summation of the rules.

The overload protection of the low rated conductor may be placed at its remote end provided this conductor is adequately protected against short-circuit by the short-circuit protection of the higher rated conductor.

This requires a calculation of the actual short circuit current - it seems contrary but [in most cases] the smaller conductor becomes vulnerable to excessive heating if the short-circuit current is not enough to open the fuse or breaker quickly!

I illustrate this by a graph from the Commentary to the 15th Edition of the IEE Wiring Regulations ISBN 0 86341 040 5 below...

I have "blacked" the curves for the 100 amp fuse and the 6 square millimetre conductor. A 6 sq.mm copper conductor would require overload protection by a 40amp fuse or MCB.

Note that currents to the right of the conductor line will overheat it (and that the fuse curve is the maximum not the average rupture current).

So for short circuits over ~900 amps the conductor is protected, but less than that overheats the conductor before the fuse blows.

This means that a short run of conductor is protected, but a longer run with higher resistance does not ensure a high enough short circuit current to blow the fuse quick enough.

I agree with the posts which regard the basis of the size rules described as suspect.

67model

Reply
Reply to Forum Thread 4 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

67model (1); jmueller (1); lyn (1); SolarEagle (1)

Previous in Forum: An EE "Whodunit" . . .   Next in Forum: LT Mainline Design

Advertisement