Effective Space Solutions and their customer service representatives only require the customer to be home between the hours of 8:00 AM to 7:59 AM, Sunday through Saturday, July 1st through June 30th.
__________________
common knowledge...less common than common sense
Dead satellites and space junk particularly
in geostationary orbits and low earth orbits are becoming a bigger and bigger
problem second by second. Less than 60 years ago there was not one piece of
hardware in space let alone junk hurtling along at mind blowing speeds which
makes even a flake of paint capable of seriously damaging a satellite. Now
there are tens of thousands of pieces of space junk and dead satellites
hurtling around the Earth. It's a constant problem for the International Space
Station which gets hit on a fairly regular basis and has to make expensive and
dangerous repairs and manoeuvres to ensure the station's safety.
It wasn't
helped a few years back when China despite very serious objections from just
about every country on Earth that relies so heavily on satellite technology, decided
to see if they could shoot down one of their old decommissioned satellites.
They succeeded and now there are thousands of more pieces of space junk in low
earth orbit that could potentially destroy very expensive operational
satellites, which by the way has already happened when an operational Iridium
satellite got wiped out by an out by and out of control satellite.
The so called Deorbiter Satellite that
pushes old geostationary satellites into a junkyard orbit that's 300 km higher
is just delaying the inevitable because very quickly the junkyard orbit will
become riddled with dead satellites and that means it's only a matter of time
before two of them manage to collide and break up into millions of projectiles
that can hit other satellites and start a chain reaction that pretty much forms
a barrier around the Earth that prevents spacecraft from getting out of Earth
orbit and out into deep space.
I'm an amateur astronomer and my telescope
has a maximum field of view of 30 arc minutes or 0.5° which
is roughly the size of the full moon. Now that's a very, very, very small patch
of sky, but I can just about guarantee that within an hour of getting the
telescope out I'll see a satellite or piece of space junk cross the field of
view which to me is extremely concerning.
What we really need to be doing is crashing
these things back into the atmosphere where they will burn up to pretty much
nothing when they hit the atmosphere travelling at 7 kms-1 or more
if you give them the appropriate push.
If we don't do something about space junk
and do it soon we could end up cutting ourselves off from space and all the
technology we have become so dependent on completely.
__________________
An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.
But if you de-orbit into a re-entry attitude you could lose your tug satellite, or use up the tug fuel faster and reduce the number of possible missions. Bad for the bottom line.
"But
if you de-orbit into a re-entry attitude you could lose your tug satellite"
It would definitely require more fuel and a
complete rethink of the design of the space junk collecting satellite, but it's no
more impossible than the satellite that raises the altitude of the orbit by 300
km. In fact you may even be able to harvest some of the energy from the
satellite you are trying to deorbit and use that with the end result that you use
less fuel.
I'll have to do some further research into
orbital mechanics and at the moment I'm tied up in bed with an O2
mask on with a respiratory tract infection so it could take some time before I
get around to it.
__________________
An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.
"Almost" Good Answers: