Previous in Forum: Simply Supported Deam Beam Deflection   Next in Forum: Crack in Masonry Load Bearing Wall
Close
Close
Close
9 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 6

Wind Loading Critical in Comparison with Seismicity - Eurocode

11/25/2014 5:50 PM

Hello, I have the following situation, I try to solve in accordance with Eurocodes. And I nee some opinions for a certain point: A tree storey steel frame, the storeys are very light (not concrete, but composite dry floor -> very light). BUT the wind loading is not small. And for this project the internal forces from the wind loading are bigger than those from the seismic combination. The frame I consider as rigid steel frame; profiles for columns and beams - IPE & HEA sections (therefore class 1 or 2). Than I should take q=4 for DCM (or more for DCH). Than the seismic lateral forces are not so big (light floors, big q) and the internal forces from the wind loading are still critical. So, now I'm not sure - should I consider the structure working in elastically for seismic situation? Because indeed the sections of the beams are big enough to resist seismic action without reaching plastification, also the columns sections are big enough in order to satisfy the displacement limit from wind combinations. And should I make all the checks for DCM where for the columns and joints the N,M,V should be increased? Or just take the actual internal forces as they are from seismic combination and make the checks with it? And if indeed the structure works in elastic situation, than is it still correct that I took q=4 in the beginning? Thanks in advance for your attention.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#1

Re: Wind loading critical in comparison with Seismicity - Eurocode

11/25/2014 11:39 PM

Is the Swiss Family Robinson trying to design a better abode?

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 270
Good Answers: 19
#2

Re: Wind Loading Critical in Comparison with Seismicity - Eurocode

11/26/2014 4:31 PM

Is it a braced frame ? Or a moment resisting frame ? Or other e.g. concrete core.

If moment resisting, be careful that the joint details can take the moments too.

As per EC8 6.1.2, if it is a dissipative structure then it is inelastic in response by definition. The whole of chapter 6 is important to read and understand and is worthwhile investing a significant amount of time doing so.

__________________
omw7
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: City of Light
Posts: 3943
Good Answers: 183
#3

Re: Wind Loading Critical in Comparison with Seismicity - Eurocode

11/27/2014 12:34 PM

What will happen if you get a seism when wind blows ? or vice versa ?

Register to Reply
Power-User
Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - Member

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Island of Stone Money
Posts: 310
Good Answers: 5
#4

Re: Wind Loading Critical in Comparison with Seismicity - Eurocode

11/29/2014 12:05 AM

Seismic load (induced) depends on the weight of the structure. Wind load (applied) depends on the surface area of the structure . Whether the structure is lighter or heavier, the wind load will remain dependent on the surface area. So, consider which one is critical.

__________________
"The more I learn, the more I know the less I've learnt"
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: City of Light
Posts: 3943
Good Answers: 183
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Wind Loading Critical in Comparison with Seismicity - Eurocode

11/29/2014 4:37 AM

I disagree since I remember that many many years ago I had to check the fasteners for a quite tall structure on its foundation and we had to consider the probability of the two appearing at same time. Of course I agree with the fact that the loads have different bonds with the structure.

Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 6
#6

Re: Wind Loading Critical in Comparison with Seismicity - Eurocode

11/29/2014 4:18 PM

willyap06, indeed this is it. At first iteration - the wind loading is critical, as the floors are really light weight, but there is a big area for the wind to load. Therefore, because of the wind loading, I have big columns displacements. The frame I consider moment resisting, but hinged to the foundation. To satisfy the SLS checks, I increase the columns sections (HE A). Beams of the moment frame are also big, as the spans are not small. Earthquake combo is not critical for any of the structural elements. So that's why I'm thinking that in case of an earthquake the structure will work mostly in elastic stage, as the sections are big enough and the beams will not reach point of plastification. And if the structure really works in elastic stage, as earthquake combination is not critical - than was it correct to take behaviour factor q=4 in the beginning? Concerning combination earthquake + wind - > I didn't make such. I think in Eurocode there is not a restriction like this. Earthquake normally combines with gravity loads.

Register to Reply
Power-User
Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - Member

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Island of Stone Money
Posts: 310
Good Answers: 5
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Wind Loading Critical in Comparison with Seismicity - Eurocode

11/29/2014 6:04 PM

CvSi: If wind load is critical, do you still use the "behavior factor" q? If you are going to consider earthquake load then refer to "Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance".

Hope this helps.

__________________
"The more I learn, the more I know the less I've learnt"
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 6
#8

Re: Wind Loading Critical in Comparison with Seismicity - Eurocode

11/30/2014 12:08 PM

willyap06, yes wind load is critical. But does this means that I don't have to add also all the checks and combinations for earthquake to prove it.

Register to Reply
Power-User
Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - Member

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Island of Stone Money
Posts: 310
Good Answers: 5
#9
In reply to #8

Re: Wind Loading Critical in Comparison with Seismicity - Eurocode

11/30/2014 6:52 PM

Check both and compare.

__________________
"The more I learn, the more I know the less I've learnt"
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 9 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

CvSi (2); nick name (2); omw7 (1); Tornado (1); willyap06 (3)

Previous in Forum: Simply Supported Deam Beam Deflection   Next in Forum: Crack in Masonry Load Bearing Wall

Advertisement