Previous in Forum: Nano Tube Tech for De-icing UAV's   Next in Forum: Health
Close
Close
Close
6 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 7

Rosemount GWR Issue

02/21/2015 10:00 AM

Hello Everybody!
I have a Rosemount 5300 Series Coaxial probe guided wave radar (HTHP type). I wanted to install it in place of a displacer in a displacer chamber. The original length of the probe assembly (Flange bottom to probe tip) was 762 mm. I reduced it to 693 mm to match my chamber's height. The procedure for cutting the coaxial type probe is provided in Rosemount reference manual.
Before cutting away the extra length the transmitter was indicating the actual physical length of probe dipped in the liquid level, quite precisely. After cutting the probe to desired length I configured the new "probe length" and "Tank height" parameters in the transmitter. However, there is a constant error of about 10 to 15 mm in the indicated level.
Also there is a dead zone created of about 20 mm at the tip of the probe. In the dead zone the level is shown 0 mm regardless of the actual level.
Anybody having experience with this type of GWR please guide me about what other configurations I have to change to remove these errors?
Thank You

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
2
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: by the beach in Florida
Posts: 33392
Good Answers: 1817
#1

Re: Rosemount GWR issue

02/21/2015 12:49 PM

Please review carefully procedures for your type configuration as well as limitations and expected results....is this a metallic tank?

__________________
All living things seek to control their own destiny....this is the purpose of life
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Member

Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 7
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Rosemount GWR issue

02/22/2015 11:54 AM

Currently I am hanging this probe in a test setup at workshop. So there is no question of interference or disturbances. I have configured the changed probe length but I don't know why is the error persisting, even when the level is away from both extremes of the probe.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 669
Good Answers: 176
#2

Re: Rosemount GWR Issue

02/21/2015 3:47 PM

The manual (page 16) is pretty good explaining the blind zones and the reduced accuracy zones:



Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Eastern Arizona mountains on Route 666 about a mile from God's country
Posts: 1676
Good Answers: 122
#4

Re: Rosemount GWR Issue

02/23/2015 9:05 AM

Suggest you contact Rosemount directly with your issue as there are parameters such as the "K" factor which are not normally referenced in the IOM but must be changed when the length of a probe or mounting distances from obstructions are altered.

__________________
They said; "Brain size?" I heard; "Train size?" so I said: "I'll take a small one, thank you."
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 7
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Rosemount GWR Issue

02/23/2015 12:31 PM

Can you tell me more about k-factor. Could it be configured using HART.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Commissariat de Police, Nouvions, occupied France, 1942.
Posts: 2599
Good Answers: 77
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Rosemount GWR Issue

03/03/2015 1:00 PM

I really don't understand why you aren't calling Rosemount directly over these are things. They are, after all, the best source of information on their own products.

__________________
Good moaning!
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 6 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Crabtree (1); Iris (1); owais_36 (2); SHOCKHISCAN (1); SolarEagle (1)

Previous in Forum: Nano Tube Tech for De-icing UAV's   Next in Forum: Health

Advertisement