Previous in Forum: 100 Years and Counting (down)   Next in Forum: Latest Launch Vehicle
Close
Close
Close
6 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1439
Good Answers: 31

Learning to Fight Without Space Based Assets

03/05/2015 11:35 PM

Learning to Fight Without Space Based Assets:

Apsidal rotation enables space denial attack because a single launch attack impacts many orbital inclinations and altitudes.

Three options for maintaining credible deterrence against Space Denial Attack are considered.

1. Absolute Space Dominance encompassing the capability to deny orbital capability from anywhere on the planet.

2. Developing tactical capability in positioning terrestrial based assets; and convincing our adversaries that those capabilities are near equivalent to existing systems.

3. Nothing.

Option 1: Absolute Space Dominance.

I believe the logic behind the original ABM treaty still applies; that is - the economic efficiencies of offensive technology far outweigh that of defensive technologies. And that extended conflict is first and foremost an economic endeavor.

Option 2: Predetermined and Flexible Positioning of Terrestrial Based Systems.

I believe tactical capability in short notice terrestrial positioning of near equivalent systems is a more reliable and robust approach at some magnitude less cost.

Option 3: Nothing.

I believe our space faring adversaries fully understand the strategic vulnerabilities of the United States, have prepared to fight in a space denied environment, and do not believe our command authority would initiate scaled nuclear warfare; even after losing all space based assets.

Roughly estimated the total payload mass to contaminate the equatorial plane from LEO to Geosync using 2 mm polystyrene pellets dispersed from a highly elliptical 43,000 km semi-major axis retrograde orbit is about 9,506 KG. This being at a dispersal rate of one particle per meter along the flight path of the attack orbit. The velocity component of a retrograde impact at Geo-station is estimated to be somewhere between 6140 and 3070 m/s. For a 2 mm polystyrene pellet I believe this would approximate a kinetic energy = 1/2mv^2 where v is the closing speed.

The mass of a single 2 mm pellet of polystyrene is estimated to be 3.52E-5 kg. The heat of vaporization for polystyrene is about 44 kJ/mole; its molecular weight is about 104.1. The estimated translated energy required to phase one pellet is estimated at 15 J. It is anticipated that upon impact enough energy will translate to phase the pellet to vapor as it passes through the target; greatly expanding the impacting cross section.

Guessing an apsidal rotation of 4 degree per day for each of the 4 attacking orbits a 4 launch attack spaced 90 degrees apart would take about 22.5 days to sweep out the entire volume between apogee and perigee of 4 identical attack orbits. (Biggest guess here as I am still working on the simple algorithm to calculate apsidal rotation.)

The folks who brought us to bankruptcy selling us a gee whiz dependency on easily defeatable space technology had to have known this from the onset. I am confident that our non-caveman adversaries knew it too.

I believe our space faring adversaries fully understand the strategic vulnerabilities of the United States and have prepared to fight in a space denied environment; I suggest we do the same.

Gavilan's Zero Sum Law of Extended Confrontation - "Whoever goes broke last - wins."

10 REM SDCs

20 CLEAR

30 PI=3.14159

40 CLS

50 PRINT" Enter the semi-major axis. ":INPUT A

60 OPL=2*PI*A: REM length of orbital path

70 PRINT OPL;" Orbital Path Length."

80 PRINT" Input material density of particles":INPUT PD

90 PRINT" Input material particle radius ": INPUT PR

100 PRINT" Input dispersal density as particles per meter ": INPUT DD

110 NP=OPL/DD: REM total number of particles to contaminate orbital path length

115 PRINT" Total number of particles to contaminate orbital path length ";NP

120 PV=4/3*PI*PR^3 : REM particle volume

130 PM = PD*PV: REM particle mass

140 TV=PV*NP: REM total warload volume

145 PRINT" Total warload volume - non-compressed. ";TV

150 TM=PM*NP: REM total particle mass

155 PRINT" Total warload mass."; TM

__________________
"The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark." -- Michelangelo
Reply
Pathfinder Tags: ASAT Orbital Debis space war war
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
5
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#1

Re: Learning to Fight Without Space Based Assets:

03/05/2015 11:41 PM

Reply Good Answer (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: by the beach in Florida
Posts: 33392
Good Answers: 1817
#2

Re: Learning to Fight Without Space Based Assets:

03/05/2015 11:53 PM

Things change.....your reasoning may be sound at this time, but what about the future? It is, and always will be, a wild card....1 single breakthrough can render all that preparation obsolete....best to concentrate on living well, in the present.....

__________________
All living things seek to control their own destiny....this is the purpose of life
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Commissariat de Police, Nouvions, occupied France, 1942.
Posts: 2599
Good Answers: 77
#3

Re: Learning to Fight Without Space Based Assets:

03/06/2015 1:23 AM

Nationality is becoming of less relevance these days. Start from there, Mildred.

__________________
Good moaning!
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Eastern Arizona mountains on Route 666 about a mile from God's country
Posts: 1676
Good Answers: 122
#4

Re: Learning to Fight Without Space Based Assets

03/06/2015 8:47 AM

Professor, you forgot the flux capacitor calculations!

Excellent post and very informative!

I am quite certain all world powers have countermeasures to offset both defensive and offensive tactical weapons including pre-launch dispersal of media designed to confuse telemetry.

I am also sure that there are many others involved in the system that have looked at this in depth.

__________________
They said; "Brain size?" I heard; "Train size?" so I said: "I'll take a small one, thank you."
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Been there, done that. Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 15600
Good Answers: 981
#5

Re: Learning to Fight Without Space Based Assets

03/06/2015 10:48 AM

I'm not sure if you want the US to be more of a bully than we already are or if paranoia has seized you.

__________________
"Don't disturb my circles." translation of Archimedes last words
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Mossel Bay, SA
Posts: 777
Good Answers: 21
#6

Re: Learning to Fight Without Space Based Assets

03/09/2015 4:48 AM

Great post. My knowledge of relevant related subjects allows me no opportunity to joinin a meaningful discussion. However, I am intrigued and my appetite whetted.

Reply
Reply to Forum Thread 6 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Crabtree (1); Hilton (1); lyn (1); redfred (1); SHOCKHISCAN (1); SolarEagle (1)

Previous in Forum: 100 Years and Counting (down)   Next in Forum: Latest Launch Vehicle

Advertisement