Networking & Communications Blog

Networking & Communications

The Networking & Communications Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about power & apps, wireless technology, voice & internet, and network security as they relate to networking and communications fields. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Will Wind Power Satisfy Energy Needs?   Next in Blog: Can Green Jobs Drive a Recovery?
Close
Close
Close
Rate Comments: Nested

Government Control Over Compensation?

Posted August 01, 2009 7:27 AM

The UK and U.S. are wrestling with how involved the national government should be in policing some executive compensation. The practicality of shareholder control is called into question because of the potential of business decisions being marginalized. Too often, management considers shareholder directives to be advisory. The U.S. financial institution compensation bill allows regulators to obtain incentive program information and rule on whether there is a risk to the financial system's stability. This still leaves the question: Who best rules on an individual's pay? Should shareholders or governments determine the size and structure of executive compensation?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Networking & Communications, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Networking & Communications today.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Power-User

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 109
Good Answers: 8
#1

Re: Government Control Over Compensation?

10/05/2009 10:18 AM

Shareholders should determine the structure of executive compensation package and the governments should stay out of it completely.

In this day and age there are many companies facing losses. Our business is operating at a loss for this year. We are all working much harder to minimize this loss than we were the years we were profitable. I believe that holds true in most cases. If someone works their tail off to turn a potentially catastrophic loss into a loss that can be absorbed, who's to say they didn't earn an incentive?

BTW; Oprah made $250 Million last year. Can you say 'Outrageous Compensation'?

__________________
OpMan
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry

Previous in Blog: Will Wind Power Satisfy Energy Needs?   Next in Blog: Can Green Jobs Drive a Recovery?

Advertisement