Medical Equipment Design Blog

Medical Equipment Design

The Medical Equipment Design Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about medical grade materials and products, electrical and electronic equipment, computers, imaging & software, and home healthcare & diagnostics as used in the medical industry. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Forbidden Medical Markets   Next in Blog: Stents Steeled for Change?
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

What's Hip: Materials Matter

Posted October 15, 2010 7:57 AM

Recalls and litigation point to mounting problems with metal-on-metal hip implants. They tend to produce metallic ion debris from friction of the two metal-bearing surfaces, and the debris has been blamed for tissue inflammation surrounding the implant. What's the prognosis for ceramic-on-ceramic options? Why not increase the use of metal-on-polyethylene bearing surfaces?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Medical Equipment Design, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Medical Equipment Design today.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
2
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Germany 49° 26' N, 7° 46' O
Posts: 1950
Good Answers: 109
#1

Re: What's Hip: Materials Matter

10/16/2010 12:31 PM

Rubbing (sliding with friction) metal on metal is a difficult subject.

In technical applications it is usually mandatory to use different materials as steel on bronze.

This results from the ability of similar or identical materials to fret and locally weld if new (non-oxidised) material is brought into contact with each other.

In seawater or body-fluid (both are water plus sodium-chloride plus other ingredients) the situation is worse as with different metals there may be galvanic corrosion unless inhibition takes place. Inhibition will mean partial or total oxidation as by chromium in stainless steels.

But if the rubbing is too intense there will the oxides be destroyed and dissolved partially. So new oxides are grown and wear will continue until problems arise.

In our body the immune system may make a much more complicated and worse scenario.

So metal on metal will have problems: some patients tolerate these without problems but some have problems and some have severe problems - very likely similar mechanisms as in allergic reactions make the difference.

Ceramic on ceramic is not at all new and will generate fewer problems as the oxides used in these implants are not soluble in our body-fluid. So there may be some wear but this will be tolerated (in most patients).

But: there is the rubbing condition known as squealing, that is in effect a fast stick-slip condition of friction and wear caused by elasticity and/or dependence of friction coefficient on velocity of sliding.

This may generate (elastic) stress in the implant that is initiating cracks, these slowly growing until catastrophic failure.

The engineering approach would be to use better ceramics (tough and shock resistant and not prone to crack growth) but cost and tradition and liability are big obstacles to change.

Metal-PE (UHMW-PE) may be worse than any other variety as the clearance is (has to be) much wider and this will invariably result in wear and our body won't tolerate the PE-squeezed particles. The squeezing and deformation seems to act as a mechano-chemical molecule reshaping method thus producing reactive molecules with any consequence you might not want. Or this is once more an amplified reaction of our immune system. Regardless which version of these is true (may be both) the patient will have problems. Added are the problems of much higher wear in the PE.

So metal-PE will be recommended only for aged patients. Bot those that live long against the odds of any statistics will have problems too.

So todays best is ceramic on ceramic. But to maintain a gap of a very few micrometer in sliding motion with the fluid between the two surfaces acting as a hydrodynamic bearing will require very close tolerances for grinding an polishing of the surfaces.

So anybody who wants to make these is recommended to buy the best possible machines, do not intend to make perfect spheres by x-y machining, use optical tolerances and measurements and try at which speed the load capacity is sufficient to bear twice the body weight. And measure or calculate how long the action of squeeze-film-damping can support the load of 5 times the body weight.

If these data look good the product will be at the front end of quality of surface generation and supporting action.

RHABE

Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Anonymous Poster
#2
In reply to #1

Re: What's Hip: Materials Matter

10/18/2010 3:23 AM

howzit!

failure of PE hip joints was also linked to a temperature increase in the joint. temperatures of up to 90degC were measured.

Can the low heat conduction of both ceramics and plastics create problems? Maybe a ceraminc on CCM implant is the way to go?

Have a look at: http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-12142006-134036/

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Germany 49° 26' N, 7° 46' O
Posts: 1950
Good Answers: 109
#3
In reply to #2

Re: What's Hip: Materials Matter

10/18/2010 4:42 AM

Thank you for the link,

as they did measure the temperature in the UHMWPE with a thermocouple there has to be a very careful analysis of the errors of this measurement.

The thermocouple has a lengthwise thermal resistance that is carrying some heat-flux, and it is coupled with its tip to the region to be measured so the thermal resistance of rubbing surface to measured region in series with the thermal resistance of the tips coating will not allow the true temperature to be monitored.

So I assume the actual temperature has been much higher. This is consistent with the brown layer that is is an indicator of excessive temperature, likely near 200°C and locally above.

If there is plasticized PE there and insufficient liquid lubrication then the coefficient of friction will be pretty high.

Low heat-conduction of plastic: yes this will certainly be a part of the problem.

Low heat conduction of aluminum-oxide: no, this is near 30W/m*K, so twice as stainless austenitic steel.

RHABE

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#4
In reply to #3

Re: What's Hip: Materials Matter

10/20/2010 4:22 AM

Pleasure.

And thanks for pointing out the k-value for aluminum oxide - some ceramics seem to be created more equal than other! ;-)

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#5

Re: What's Hip: Materials Matter

11/05/2010 3:16 PM

1.While researching for medical supplies and dental supplies, I found New Line Medical. They have no user reviews section for their products, so I'm unsure how to rate their products. Can anyone help?
2.Does anyone know where I can find a good dental supplies company?
3.Does anyone know where I can find a good medical supplies company?

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 5 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

Previous in Blog: Forbidden Medical Markets   Next in Blog: Stents Steeled for Change?

Advertisement