|
The recent tragic and completely avoidable death
of a toddler by falling from an upper escalator landing should serve as an
example of how we look at safety and safety inspections. This apparently
occurred because a guard-piece was not sufficient, did not meet code for size,
and the youth was able to pass through the outer deck area of an escalator and
fall to the floor below. I have not personally visited the site to take
measurements. News reports and inter-industry data have reported the incident.
News reports state that the escalator was
inspected in the weeks preceding the incident and that the guard was not cited
as insufficient by state inspectors who performed the onsite inspection. Two
inspectors were indentified and removed from inspection duties while the
investigation continues. In my heart, I do not believe either inspector, their
bosses or the escalator's owners would do anything knowingly and intentionally
to cause harm. I do believe somewhere
our system of laws and rules has failed from human error.
The questions:
1.
When the
inspection of the escalator took place, how thorough was the inspection?
2.
Was the
guard/barricade proper during the last inspection and replaced afterward due to
breakage?
3.
Who
installed the guard/barricade?
4.
Was a
licensed escalator mechanic involved in the guard/barricade replacement?
I will state upfront that I am not a fan of big
government or the need to have law upon redundant law for every situation. So
after careful debate and looking at all aspects of adding a law, we add it, and
when we do have a law, rule or code in-place that is deemed for the public
good, how about enforcing that?
Escalator and elevator use has become so commonplace and used safely by the public many thousands times a day, most become
unaware of the safety issues involved in operating that equipment. When these
transportation devices were newly introduced, (and I wasn't around yet so I base
this opinion on what I've read and studied) they were viewed as a novelty and
attention was paid to the details of using these unique means of vertical
transportation. After all, they were introduced mostly at fairs as attractions
and rides.
Since then, we in the industry have gotten pretty
good at developing and installing safe products. As a company, when we consult
and provide instruction on repairs, maintenance, and upgrades to equipment owners, our motto is: "a passenger should be able to
ride the unit and later not have any recollection about that trip". This means
that nothing notable happened when using the escalator or elevator. I stress
that "this ain't a amusement park where people pay for the thrill of a ride".
Inspectors and Safety Inspections
States vary in their approach to safety
inspections: some have state-employed inspectors, while others have replaced
state inspectors with licensed third-party inspectors. Others have a few
state inspectors overseeing the third-party inspectors. Interesting is that
according to some industry data, incidents have increased where third-party
inspections have become the method of choice.
When equipment owners pay for
inspections or allow their elevator contractor to hire the third-party
inspector for them, are they getting a "deal" by having an inspector that is
not as strict as another? It is well-known, but mostly not talked about, among
elevator/escalator mechanics, supervisors and building owners that there are some
inspectors more selective or lenient in listing violations than others. How
about the end cost?
Many inspectors have personal histories with
the elevator company doing the work: they may be or have been coworkers, buddies,
and relatives. That does not mean the inspector may be biased either positively
or negatively just because they used to work with the mechanics doing the work,
but any sense of that relationship has to be put aside and a fair and unbiased
inspection performed.
During a recent newspaper interview, I
stressed the fact that how many units did the inspectors have to look at during
the day, week, month or year? For me to do a complete escalator inspection with
qualified mechanics, including Performance Index testing, can take 3 to 4
hours depending on conditions. I allow small repairs and corrections to be made
during the inspection, so the time can go far beyond the minimum. So maybe we
can do 2 thorough escalator inspections in an 8-hour day, including paperwork. Most
inspectors will have to plan any travel to the site in that workday as well.
Integrity is the key.
- Joe
|