Hemmings Motor News Blog Blog

Hemmings Motor News Blog

Hemmings Motor News has been around since 1954. We're proud of our heritage, but we're also more than the Hemmings full of classifieds that your father subscribed to. Aside from new editorial content every month in Hemmings, we have three monthly magazines: Hemmings Muscle Machines, Hemmings Classic Car and Hemmings Sports and Exotic Car.

While our editors traverse the country to find the best content for those magazines, we find other oddities related to the old-car hobby that we really had no place for - until now. With this blog, we're giving you a behind-the-scenes look at what we see and what we do during the course of putting out some of the finest automotive magazines you'll ever read.

Previous in Blog: Remembering the First Jeep   Next in Blog: 1963 Luxury: Ford Thunderbird vs. Buick Riviera
Close
Close
Close
2 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Mac McKellar: Pontiac Performance Engineer

Posted May 03, 2011 8:30 AM by dstrohl

The Pontiac hobby as well as America's automotive heritage lost one of its greatest engineers when noted Pontiac engine designer Malcolm "Mac" McKellar passed away on April 9, 2011. Mac was the lead engineer and driving force behind Pontiac's highly successful Super Duty racing program, which put Pontiac on the performance chart, where it quickly rose to the top.

Besides Mac's astute engineering of Pontiac engines and camshaft designs, he will long be remembered among Pontiac aficionados for the one-off overhead-camshaft 421-cu.in. V-8 that he built and fitted to his 1963 Grand Prix. However, Mac's creation of the OHC Sprint-6 engine was perhaps his biggest legacy.

From an April 2008 feature article about Mac McKellar in Hemmings Muscle Machines:

"The culmination of McKellar's work went into an overhead-camshaft version of the Pontiac V-8. It used a similar zero-lash hydraulic valvetrain to the six-cylinder, but had two camshafts--one per bank of cylinders. McKellar eventually installed the running prototype engine into a 1963 Grand Prix, but Pontiac cut the program short when management decided that the pushrod V-8 engines still offered plenty of power at lower cost and less risk of warranty work. McKellar remained with Pontiac for more than a decade after that, but he said the gas crunch and rise of emissions standards in the 1970s 'took all the fun out of it.'"

Visit Hemmings Motor News

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 121
Good Answers: 4
#1

Re: Mac McKellar: Pontiac Performance Engineer

05/03/2011 11:13 PM

I am sorry and don't mean to offend anyone, but I have never been able to equate Pontiac and performance having seen a Pontiac "sportscar" at a brake repair shop I was working in in the late 1970's, with massive DRUM brakes on the front. It was the only "sportscar" I ever met so equipped.

The use of truck parts said a lot about the American dedication to performance.

Driving a Mustang also gave me a lack of respect in the same manner, it was the most tail-happy thing I have ever driven, especially int he wet. the next closest was an MGB. I suppose there are worse out there, but I haven't met them.

Reply
2
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 19
Good Answers: 3
#2

Re: Mac McKellar: Pontiac Performance Engineer

05/04/2011 11:18 AM

Smeaton: The Mustang, and anything Pontiac, are not 'sports' cars - as you say. You are correct.

They are American Muscle cars, the Mustang more specifically a 'pony' car, built for wide open spaces and long, straight roads. Driving conditions and consumer preferences here dictated designs having compliant suspension, powerful engines, and simple, durable running gear. They are not refined, and were not meant to be. Either you wanted it for the look, or, if you were a performance buff, you would mod them to your liking, without having broken the bank on fancy factory parts you'd later throw away, like todays stock alloy wheels...

Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Reply to Blog Entry 2 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

Previous in Blog: Remembering the First Jeep   Next in Blog: 1963 Luxury: Ford Thunderbird vs. Buick Riviera

Advertisement