|
From Neatorama:
Last week, a meteor exploded over Russia
with, according to some press descriptions "the force of 30 Hiroshima
bombs." These were references to the US atomic bombing of Hiroshima,
Japan on 6 August 1945. Atomic historian Alex Wellerstein says that the
analogy makes little sense:
"In general," he
added, "What I don't like is ... the idea that kiloton or a megaton is
just an energy unit, that it's equivalent to so many joules or
something. Because you could do that. You could claim that your house
runs so many tons of TNT worth of electricity per year, but it sort of
trivializes the notion." [...]
But nuclear weapons deliver
more than just sheer force; there's also incredible heat, orders of
magnitude hotter than a meteor's explosion, (most of the people who died
at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Wellerstein says, died of fire), and, of
course, the radiation. The radiation brings sickness, makes land
uninhabitable in the long term, and can have residual genetic effects
that long outlast the bomb's immediate destruction. "It's sort of the
sum of these effects that we think of when we think of what's the
problem with nuclear weapons," he says. To only think of an atomic
weapon in terms of the kilotons of energy released glosses over the
totality of the terror these bombs bring.
Read the whole article
|
Good Answers: