Building & Design Blog Blog

Building & Design Blog

The Building & Design Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about building projects, tools and equipment, materials and hardware, and environment & energy. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: How Extreme Heat Damages Your Roof   Next in Blog: Five Amazing Engineering Feats
Close
Close
Close
8 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Conventional Building Vs. Green Building

Posted August 10, 2013 12:00 AM by CR4 Guest Author

Green building practices involve creating structures that are good for the environment and sustainable in the long run. Buildings using conventional methods of construction account for more than 39 percent of total energy use and 12 percent of total water consumption. They also consume 68 percent of total electricity produced across United States and are responsible for 38 percent of the carbon dioxide emissions. Green buildings seek to address drawbacks associated with conventional buildings and offer improved comfort, utility and durability.

Increase in population and demand has led to creation of bigger buildings and more complicated structures in recent times. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has recommended green building techniques to overcome their negative impact on environment, health and economy. These techniques can be included at every stage of construction such as design, development, construction and renovation.
Green buildings offer several benefits over their conventional counterparts.

Environmental Benefits

Green buildings use reusable or recyclable components and bio-based materials that reduce waste generation and protect natural resources. They generate less waste at every stage of construction and during operation. This can help improve air and water quality and reduce waste streams. Green buildings also release minimal amounts of toxic wastes into the environment.

Unlike conventional buildings, most green buildings are water-efficient as well. They reuse and recycle water and are equipped with responsible storm water management systems.

Conventional buildings use traditional lighting, and heating and cooling systems. These can leave a large carbon footprint and lead to high energy bills. Green buildings use energy efficient appliances that are good for the environment.

Economic Benefits

While conventional buildings may involve minimal initial investment, they are associated with higher operational costs in the long run. Green buildings, on the other hand, come with low energy bills and improved productivity. Green buildings will minimize strain and impact on local resources.
They also promote sustainable growth and development of the community in general.

Health Benefits

Green buildings also offer health benefits that are beyond the reach of conventional structures. Low levels of toxins and environmental wastes can help improve and maintain the health and productivity of the occupants.

Good indoor air quality can also add to the comfort of the employees and the residents. It can lower the risk of chronic illnesses such as asthma, allergies and certain types of cancers as well. Occupants can also enjoy lower temperatures, better lighting and improved air flow.

Green buildings are relatively new to the world of architecture. Some professionals may not have the desired expertise. However, with little vision and commitment, you will be able to incorporate several features that can convert your conventional building into a green one.

A trained professional will handle every aspect from site selection and orientation to foundation, roof and walls. He will also help you choose the right heating and air conditioning system. Your building will have effective ventilation. Energy efficient lighting will also improve the look and utility of your building while lowering energy bills and carbon footprint (you can check http://www.bishopspondsv.com/ gallery to see professional and efficient work from reputable home builders).

Many people prefer conventional buildings due to lower initial investment. Green buildings may require some additional commitment in the beginning but the initial effort can reap rich dividends in the long run. You will also have the satisfaction of doing your part and contributing to the green revolution for the larger good.

Image: Creative Commons image source

Editor's Note: Bob Murphy is a part time blogger for various eco friendly websites. Here he explained all the benefits of so called 'green building' comparing to conventional building.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Power-User

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: I am located in Mumbai,India.
Posts: 125
Good Answers: 2
#1

Re: Conventional Building Vs. Green Building

08/11/2013 1:44 AM

Considering life cycle cost of building, green buildings will be of great advantage.

And with the health benefits that you have shown, there is definite reason for opting for Green buildings. I think for the health benefits, in future, the customers will demand Green buildings

__________________
Rajesh
Reply
2
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 1975
Good Answers: 117
#2

Re: Conventional Building Vs. Green Building

08/11/2013 8:48 AM

I like the feel good philosophy of most "green" manufactured items. I dont like the way it is implimented or marketed.

A truly "green" building will be made from materials found right there on the building site. Or within a couple of miles. We have "green" construction materials coming in on boxcars from the other coast. Thats not "green", thats Bullshite.

The picture illustrating this article is a fine example of what is NOT green.... a sprawling neighbourhood of wood clad elderly houses on a paved street. The paving is asphault instead of cobbles...the wood is painted with a chemical soup which makes up modern paint, the sidewalks are made from concrete which had to be burnt from mined limestone, and I note that every house has a chimney to burn fossil fuel.

A green neighbourhood which puts its money where its mouth is would have a road made from blocks laid on their sides so that grass can grow up through them. Sidewalks the same... This would likely not save much concrete, but at least you would be looking at a green oxygen producing space instead of a concrete and ashphault desert. Houses should not be demolished just to make them "green", but they can be retrofitted with heavier insulated walls which will require very limited if any supplementary heating. Roofs can be made from steel instead of flammable shingles which only last 20 years for a net energy saving...and old steel roofs can and will be recycled. Windows can be be replaced with low e windows. My jury is out on the value of retrofitted solar panels, but they might serve to reduce the parasitic loads which suck twenty percent of the energy production in this country.

So, "green" sounds good. It is rarely implimented, even when it is cheaper to do so.

__________________
If it was easy anybody could do it.
Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Conventional Building Vs. Green Building

08/11/2013 10:19 AM

If only every place looked like Hobbiton....

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 1975
Good Answers: 117
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Conventional Building Vs. Green Building

08/11/2013 10:31 PM

It doesn't have to look like hobbiton T., it just has to follow some fairly established principles. Rammed Earth, burnt clay bricks, stone and cordwood construction from materials found on site are almost never considered when building "green". Easily recycled materials and re-used items are sometimes considered, but considering the difficulty of adjusting blueprints to suit odd available salvage, the price skyrockets for little gain.

The R2000 buildings developed by the University of Manitoba are not "green" by MY definition of Green, but they reduce the energy footprint remarkably, and have become standard. And they are nice houses to live in, well ventilated and cozy. Dennis Weavers huge home made from rammed earth tires is about as green as you can get. Rammed earth monolith construction is easy as long as you have lots of cheap labour, but it has to be built right or you don't get a permit.

Green building. Most misused words in the construction industry.

(burnt clay bricks made from local clay? Well, we find that unlike concrete, bricks are often pretty enough to be recycled somewhere down the line, and they last longer than most anything else in the world. Way longer than vinyl siding,)

__________________
If it was easy anybody could do it.
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - Wannabeabettawelda

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Annapolis, Maryland
Posts: 7940
Good Answers: 458
#5

Re: Conventional Building Vs. Green Building

08/12/2013 12:07 PM

What does this mean?

"Buildings using conventional methods of construction account for more than 39 percent of total energy use and 12 percent of total water consumption. They also consume 68 percent of total electricity produced across United States and are responsible for 38 percent of the carbon dioxide emissions."

If you are going to throw out statistics, at least couch them in such a way that we can make some sort of comparison. Maybe what you meant is that conventionally built building use 39% more total energy and 12% more water than so-called green buildings. If the reader has to guess . . . .

Can we please stop calling them green buildings, green this, or green that? I have developed a severe aversion to the much abused term. I could stomach it much better if we just called them energy/resource efficient. I appreciate energy efficiency. It saves me money. It lets me leave many lights on a lot longer and still pay the same electric bill.

As for other aspects of green buildings, there is so much unsubstantiated fluff in this posting. "Low levels of toxins and environmental wastes can help improve and maintain the health and productivity of the occupants." What does this mean? Any examples? Data? Control sets? I looked at the link and found no substance there either.

<sigh>

Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 1975
Good Answers: 117
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Conventional Building Vs. Green Building

08/12/2013 2:53 PM

Ah, relax. This is just a poorly disguised advertisement for Bishop's Pond real estate corp. The first link was to a rather pointless article on the uselessness of LEED as a criteria of "green building", (as if it was meant to be! ha!) that as far as I can see was just to buttress a bunch of blather which boils down to "we should make houses better". And then, the second link was to a company which makes ridiculously expensive single family homes which contribute to urban sprawl and show upon examination that they are no more green than any other builder. The link between "better", "greener" and Bishop's Pond homes is as tenuous as a politician's promise.

I don't know why this post ever got onto CR4. Its just an advert.

__________________
If it was easy anybody could do it.
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - Wannabeabettawelda

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Annapolis, Maryland
Posts: 7940
Good Answers: 458
#8
In reply to #6

Re: Conventional Building Vs. Green Building

08/12/2013 7:23 PM

Ah, now I see. I somehow missed the link to the Bishop's Ponds drivel. This is obviously geared to appeal to people with more money than sense. Thanks for the update !!

Cheers

Reply
Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 23647
Good Answers: 420
#7
In reply to #5

Re: Conventional Building Vs. Green Building

08/12/2013 4:37 PM

Can we please stop calling them green buildings, green this, or green that?

But the Marketing department dislike the use of the color brown.

__________________
“ When people get what they want, they are often surprised when they get what they deserve " - James Wood
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 8 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Brave Sir Robin (2); phoenix911 (1); rsalaskar (1); Tornado (1); Yusef1 (3)

Previous in Blog: How Extreme Heat Damages Your Roof   Next in Blog: Five Amazing Engineering Feats

Advertisement