The Engineer's Notebook Blog

The Engineer's Notebook

The Engineer's Notebook is a shared blog for entries that don't fit into a specific CR4 blog. Topics may range from grammar to physics and could be research or or an individual's thoughts - like you'd jot down in a well-used notebook.

Previous in Blog: Younger Generation in Government and Technology   Next in Blog: Best Engineering Movies
Close
Close
Close
7 comments
Rating: Comments: Nested

Bigfoot Research Brushes With Science

Posted August 09, 2013 12:00 AM by Hannes

It was almost nine feet tall and weighed close to half a ton. Long fur draped around its face, and ear-piercing howls emitted from its giant mouth. No, we're not describing Chewie, Harry, or your mother-in-law…it's Gigantopithecus, a relatively-recently extinct giant ape. Paleontologists know little about "Gigantos" and have been hesitant to make concrete statements based on minimal fossil evidence, but cryptologists - who seem eager to venture where scientists fear to tread - posit that the possibility of a relict population of these beasts provides the most scientifically plausible case for the existence of Bigfoot.

Gigantopithecus was named in the 1930s by Ralph von Koenigswald, a German anthropologist who discovered the ape's fossilized teeth being sold as divination bones in a Chinese medicine shop. Since this time, the only known relevant fossils are thousands more teeth and a few mandibles recovered from China, Vietnam, and India. Paleontologists have classified the finds as belonging to three species of Gigantopithecus: G. blacki, G. bilaspurensis, and G. giganteus. Because the teeth and mandibles are the only extant fossils of Gigantos, their constructed appearance is based largely on speculation and comparison to the bones of the most similar living species of orangutans. In any case, scientists believe that G. blacki, the largest of the three species, was upwards of 2.5 meters tall when standing and went extinct about 100,000 years ago. After doing a bit of math, we find that G. blacki lived concurrently with Homo sapiens for approximately 80,000 years, and with Homo erectus for over one million. Their powerful teeth were probably used to process the plentiful bamboo in their South Asian habitat.

According to such groups as the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization (BFRO), bigfoots (apparently they purport that there's more than one in existence) are most likely leftover Gigantopithecus; they have aptly named this as the "Bigfoot-Giganto theory." Bigfoot researchers, though, have still had to make major assumptions about Gigantos to construct a plausible "theory." The widest leap involves the assumption that Gigantopithecus walked upright (as do bigfoots, they say), which is highly unlikely due to the enormous strain of the beast's weight on its legs and ankles, as well as the fact that most extant great apes are quadrupeds. Another assumption with little merit is that, because most Bigfoot sightings have occurred in North America's Pacific Northwest region, Gigantos would have needed to cross the Bering land bridge to migrate to what is now North America. (Coincidentally this migration would've been dependent on bipedal locomotion; the established extinction date for Gigantopithecus also falls tens of thousands of years before the feasibility of Beringia migration.) As to why there have been no fossil discoveries outside of South Asia, the BFRO responds with something like "because no one has looked yet."

The question of Gigantopithecus' extinction dogs both the scientific and pseudoscientific communities. Climate change, inadequate diets, and competition with other ape species seem to be the most plausible explanations. Some scientists believe that predation by crocodiles, bears, sabre-tooth cats and early humans may have done them in. Bigfoot researchers have spun this theory their own way, claiming that predation by Homo sapiens could not have possibly wiped out the entire species; more importantly, they purport that living Gigantos are left with a morbid fear of humans, which explains why we've never seen one in person.

The case of Gigantopithecus remains interesting because both groups - scientists and Bigfoot researchers - are continuously attempting to make sense of a creature about which we know very little for certain. With little fossil evidence to draw upon, we may even have another Mantell/Owen Iguanodon on our hands. Despite some relatively irrefutable facts which fly in the face of their theories, cryptid hunters will continue to speculate, hypothesize, theorize, and proselytize. We know one thing for sure: if [a] bigfoot shows up, don't mess with him.

(Image credits: podgallery.org | MacroEvolution | Prehistoric Wildlife)

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Posts: 13529
Good Answers: 468
#1

Re: Bigfoot Research Brushes With Science

08/10/2013 1:50 PM

It was me.

I went camping, got drunk, lost my keys, and went looking for them. People were making howling sounds all around me...I just figured they were drunker than I was.

Thanks for the clarification.

__________________
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Ben Franklin
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - Member

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ''but, don't we get PAID to ask questions?...''
Posts: 1661
Good Answers: 17
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Bigfoot Research Brushes With Science

08/10/2013 7:18 PM

I once hiked up to Trinity Mountain Ranger Station, decades ago, upon arrival, and found it was totally ''trashed'', with not a single glass window pane left unbroken.

Apparently, the previous occupants over-celebrated a bit, and left without making any effort to repair anything...

I did not find out till later that, at that time, it was thought to be at the lower limit of the range of range of Bigfoot. If I had neighbors that were so (rough-hewn), I would not hang around to be seen by them either...

__________________
''illigitimi non carborundum...''(i.e.: don't let the fatherless (self-deluding,sabotaging, long-term-memory-impaired, knee-jerking, cheap-shotting, mono-syllabic, self-annointed, shadow-lurking, back-biting, off-topic-inquisitors) grind you down...)
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Posts: 13529
Good Answers: 468
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Bigfoot Research Brushes With Science

08/11/2013 11:08 AM

I tried watching that TV show about the people looking for bigfoot, and couldn't stick with it. Week after week of nothing but people filming each other in the dark.

__________________
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Ben Franklin
Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 732
Good Answers: 17
#7
In reply to #3

Re: Bigfoot Research Brushes With Science

08/27/2013 6:56 PM

Where's the good-observation button...?

I'll just give a GA instead.

I go camping up north of Mt. Baker in Washington State. My kids (10-18 at various times) would get nervous about various animals and, of course, Bigfoot.

I liked X-Files and Fringe and all of those fun shows on TV, but I had to have a serious sit-down with each of them and explain that throughout all of that crap on TV and in the rest of the available media that it all results in one thing: NIL..

We have no Nessie, Mothman, Chupacabra, Thin Man, Tall Man, Bigfoot, Alien, ghosts, demons, Cropsey, Bloody Mary, etc. Nothing...nada....even with all of that excellent journalism and documentary evidence that the History Channel (of all things!) and Discovery (another great travesty) produce.

There is no solid proof and no matter how hard they try they simply won't find fantasy existing in the real world. How disappointing it must be for some parents when their kids turn out that way.

My kids are believers at least...in reality...not reality TV.

__________________
common knowledge...less common than common sense
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Musician - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 523
Good Answers: 17
#4

Re: Bigfoot Research Brushes With Science

08/12/2013 5:06 PM

I am glad to hear that homo sapiens could not have wiped out an entire species. What a dodo I was to have believed such a thing. I'll be able to enjoy my traditional Super Bowl bucket of spotted owl wings next year without feeling any guilt.

Reply
Power-User
Hobbies - Musician - New Member Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member

Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 431
Good Answers: 6
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Bigfoot Research Brushes With Science

08/12/2013 5:32 PM

Spotted owl wings? I'll have to try those. Being a good Western New Yorker I've only had Buffalo wings:

__________________
Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to be normal. -Camus
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 732
Good Answers: 17
#6

Re: Bigfoot Research Brushes With Science

08/27/2013 6:46 PM

Great...cryptozoology on CR4...

It will all end in tears, I just know it.

__________________
common knowledge...less common than common sense
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 7 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Hannes (1); kramarat (2); MR. Guest (1); reward54 (1); The.Tinkerer (2)

Previous in Blog: Younger Generation in Government and Technology   Next in Blog: Best Engineering Movies

Advertisement