Engineering News Blog

Engineering News

Latest news of interest to engineers. Sourced from GlobalSpec's Engineering News

Previous in Blog: How to Survive Extreme Cold   Next in Blog: ETH Zurich Researchers Create Ultra-Thin, Flexible Circuit
Close
Close
Close
4 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Universe Measured To 1% Accuracy

Posted January 09, 2014 9:58 AM

From BBC News - Science & Environment:

Astronomers have pinpointed the positions of galaxies in the universe to a new 'gold standard' accuracy of just 1%.

Read the whole article

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Commentator

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 82
Good Answers: 3
#1

Re: Universe Measured To 1% Accuracy

01/10/2014 7:28 AM

of course if the universe is expanding rapidly then this measurement can't be this precise for very long...and the thought of a flat universe makes me uncomfortable..

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 581
Good Answers: 15
#2

Re: Universe Measured To 1% Accuracy

01/10/2014 11:06 AM

So there's 9.4605284 × 1013 meters error in every light year measure? That's about 100 BILLION KILOMETERS, you know. (I hope I did the math right.)

Big deal.

__________________
Ignorance is no sin. Willful ignorance is unforgiveable.
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - Don't Know What Made The Old Title Attractive... Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - 60 Year Member

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Yellowstone Valley, in Big Sky Country
Posts: 7425
Good Answers: 295
#3

Re: Universe Measured To 1% Accuracy

01/10/2014 4:16 PM

Really?

Someone needs to be handed a dictionary, opened to the entry of 'Hubris'.

Might be better to have said "...the known universe...".

__________________
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8006
Good Answers: 286
#4

Re: Universe Measured To 1% Accuracy

01/11/2014 4:34 AM

Wonder what values they evaluated their measurement against to arrive at the conclusion it is 1% accurate? If their calculation of accuracy is worth much, then the actual value has to be known with decent certainty to at least the same or better accuracy, right?

.

Anyway, 1% accuracy sounds pretty crappy to me. As long as they are assuming actual values to verify their calculations, why not make it sound more exciting and say it is 90 or 95% accurate?

__________________
Eternal vigilance is the price of knowledge. - George Santayana
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 4 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Doorman (1); Lynn.Wallace (1); martin wolf (1); truth is not a compromise (1)

Previous in Blog: How to Survive Extreme Cold   Next in Blog: ETH Zurich Researchers Create Ultra-Thin, Flexible Circuit

Advertisement