Healthcare Engineering Blog

Healthcare Engineering

The Healthcare Engineering Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about Infrastructure, Healthcare Devices and Products, Information Management, and Patient Safety and Security. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Wearable Health-Monitoring Patches   Next in Blog: Artificial Joints
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Coronary Stents-A Biomedical Triumph

Posted December 11, 2014 12:41 PM by CR4 Guest Author

The idea of dilating disease-narrowed arteries with balloons on catheter tips came into prominence in the 1970s due to the pioneering work of Andreas Gruentzig, a brilliant and courageous Swiss radiologist. The first catheters used in humans were fashioned by hand on his kitchen table. In 1977 he performed the first cath lab procedure on an awake patient. By 1980, 1,000 angioplasty procedures had been performed. It was apparent by then that one of the major difficulties was acute closure of the artery during or just after the procedure. Most procedures were performed with heart surgeons standing by. Recurrent blockage over the next 6-12 months also was a problem.

It was apparent that something needed to be done to improve the procedure. Many biomedical engineers and scientists had been working on various devices ranging from intra coronary cutting devices (Rotablator, Directional Atherectomy) to stents (expandable metallic matrices that open and maintain the expansion in narrowed arteries).

The first coronary stent approved was the Palmaz-Schatz-Balloon Expandable Stent, which reduced the incidence of restenosis or repeat narrowing by 25-35% over the six months post-procedure. Although the use of this stent exploded, it was recognized that there were significant issues that limited its successful use:

  • It was somewhat rigid, making it difficult to place
  • It could not be used over long areas of narrowing
  • It was disposed to clotting, and the drugs used to prevent this caused bleeding and lengthened hospital stays

In spite of these issues, the initial success of the Palmaz stent was encouraging. The industry saw a huge market, the medical profession realized the breakthrough this device had become, and the biomedical community realized that this was a fertile field for research and development. Areas for improvement included more flexible but equally strong materials and design, the potential for drug eluting stents, absorbable stents, radiation delivering stents, and multiple other designs and features.

No doubt some of these ideas were science fiction, but others were real and effective. They represented the work of many multidisciplinary groups around the world. Today there are many device-manufacturing companies with several models of stents and balloon catheters competing in the market place. One of the problems along the way has been that the explosive R and D has lead to there being many catheter improvements and stent improvements being released before the previous device had been thoroughly used and evaluated. In spite of this acute clotting during the procedure has been virtually eliminated and the incidence of re-stenosis or recurrent narrowing is very low at present. My two stents have been open for 16 years!

image credit

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 23647
Good Answers: 420
#1

Re: Coronary Stents-A Biomedical Triumph

12/11/2014 1:12 PM

My dad had his first angioplasty back in the 80's.

It was only temporary as well as painful. so painful in fact that he tried to put it off for them doing it again, but we they did it, it was an out patient procedure with no pain at all.

The third time he had a stent put in, and then he had a double by-pass.

The procedures are becoming more and more, less aggressive and tramatic.

__________________
“ When people get what they want, they are often surprised when they get what they deserve " - James Wood
Reply
Guru

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Metro.Manila, Philippines.
Posts: 1269
Good Answers: 27
#2

Re: Coronary Stents-A Biomedical Triumph

12/12/2014 9:03 AM

The idea and its accompanying technologies are both sound and good.. From clinical standpoint /observations of implementing such interventions, any and most of the resulting problems were triggered /caused by the way the procedures were handled..

Akin to carpentry, the quality and longevity of the finished products or end results are dependent mostly on the craftsmanship and type of materials used!

These invasive procedures although supposedly guided and aided by either x-ray or fluoroscopy, to date still are not 100% safe for the patient!

__________________
vsar
Reply
Guru

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Wolfe Island, ON
Posts: 1357
Good Answers: 109
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Coronary Stents-A Biomedical Triumph

12/15/2014 10:45 AM

As a survivor of 13 angiolplasty/angiography, and 4 stents installed, I will say the procedure is much safer than the alternative of open heart bypass surgery (which I have also undergone) or doing nothing. I have complete empathy with the female hot flash problem. Retired, active, and enjoy every day.

__________________
If they want holy water, tell them to boil the hell out of it.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Metro.Manila, Philippines.
Posts: 1269
Good Answers: 27
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Coronary Stents-A Biomedical Triumph

12/15/2014 11:55 AM

I concur and agree with you! Angioplasty/angiography is a much simpler and therefore safer procedures than an open heart! And I am congratulating you and the rest who have had undergone through the same experiences and successfully survived those procedures.

What I am trying to emphasize is the fact that no matter how safe a procedure can be, since it is invasive it will never going to be a sure bet, it will still be 50/50 for the receiver.

The first 50% applies to the procedure, the application techniques and any associated technologies have been tested and proven to be safe and effective... The other remaining 50% applies to the individual/practitioner that will be chosen to implement such procedure(s)!

To increase one's chances of survival with successful outcome for longevity, the practitioner must be selected and critique very carefully. He/she must have already demonstrated, respected with a proven track record in handling such procedure(s). Additionally, he/she must be connected with institutions that also excels in those areas!

__________________
vsar
Reply
Guru

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Wolfe Island, ON
Posts: 1357
Good Answers: 109
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Coronary Stents-A Biomedical Triumph

12/15/2014 6:17 PM

I believe the odds are much better and problems are at a minimum. I take your point in knowing but it happens most often under emergency conditions and there is no time to vet the doctors. All that said a novice doctor has to start with someone. I did have that situation, once. The doctor in charge of the novice was quick to come to the fore when he discharged the radio isotope prematurely and was actual removed and the head doctor took over. That was the only glitch in any procedure. I was fully awake for all procedures. All procedures like these are invasive and of course contain inherent life risks. I was never afraid of the procedures at any time. It is the best diagnostic tool for blocked arteries and replaces surgeries most often when stents or balloon angioplasty can be used. You can even be at home the same day. Good bang for the buck. Open heart is always a fall back.

Must be getting old. Talking about health issues like an old folk I knew when I was ...

__________________
If they want holy water, tell them to boil the hell out of it.
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 5 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

kevinm (2); phoenix911 (1); vsar (2)

Previous in Blog: Wearable Health-Monitoring Patches   Next in Blog: Artificial Joints

Advertisement