Hemmings Motor News Blog Blog

Hemmings Motor News Blog

Hemmings Motor News has been around since 1954. We're proud of our heritage, but we're also more than the Hemmings full of classifieds that your father subscribed to. Aside from new editorial content every month in Hemmings, we have three monthly magazines: Hemmings Muscle Machines, Hemmings Classic Car and Hemmings Sports and Exotic Car.

While our editors traverse the country to find the best content for those magazines, we find other oddities related to the old-car hobby that we really had no place for - until now. With this blog, we're giving you a behind-the-scenes look at what we see and what we do during the course of putting out some of the finest automotive magazines you'll ever read.

Previous in Blog: Homeland Security to Return Seized Land Rover Defenders to U.S. Buyers   Next in Blog: Put Your Pocket-Sized Camera to Work in the Garage
Close
Close
Close
Rate Comments: Nested

EPA Backs Down on Ethanol Requirements; Proposals to Eliminate RFS Stalled

Posted June 10, 2015 9:00 AM by dstrohl
Pathfinder Tags: EPA ethanol. legislation fuel

Long-awaited Renewable Fuel Standard program revisions that the EPA released late last month indicate that while the federal agency has no plans to reverse corn ethanol's presence in the U.S. fuel supply, EPA officials also don't support blending as much total ethanol into fuel as it once did.

Expected in 2013, the proposed RFS volumes of renewable fuels-which include both advanced biofuels and corn-derived ethanol-stipulate 15.93 billion total gallons for 2014, 16.3 billion gallons for 2015, and 17.4 billion gallons for 2016. The EPA derived all the 2014 volumes from actual amounts put onto the market last year.

Those numbers fall short of the total volumes the EPA initially proposed five years ago by 2.22 billion gallons for 2014 (12 percent), 4.2 billion gallons for 2015 (20 percent), and 4.85 gallons for 2016 (22 percent). Analysts point to a number of factors for the revised projections, including the effects of hitting the E10 blend wall, reduced demand for gasoline in general, and slower adoption of advanced biofuels (cellulosic biofuel, for example, comprised just 33 million gallons of the 2014 totals, versus a projected 1.75 billion gallons).

See why the EPA is cutting back its E15 expansion.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#1

Re: EPA Backs Down on Ethanol Requirements; Proposals to Eliminate RFS Stalled

06/12/2015 3:18 PM

Ethanol: The ONLY fuel that (1) is permanent pollution to surface water and aquifer water, (2) requires an environmental agency, and government funding and large payoffs to farmers to make it remotely viable, and (3) ruins nearly every fuel system it touches, and has increased mechanic's workloads an untold factor of X (reads times, not ex). Not only that, it costs more fuel (and water) to produce it than what is it is so-called worth. Only a complete idiot, or a large corporate entity (read that large idiot), including government agencies would somehow come up with this as a "win-win" idea. I would really like to know who the winners really are... have not seen any yet.

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry

Previous in Blog: Homeland Security to Return Seized Land Rover Defenders to U.S. Buyers   Next in Blog: Put Your Pocket-Sized Camera to Work in the Garage

Advertisement