|
My earlier CR4 blogs discussed non-chemical-based lawn-care
practices, so you won't be surprised to see another entry along the general
line of organic horticultural practices. While traveling around Provence last
summer I saw quite a few vineyards labeled "biologique," "biodynamique" or
simply just "bio." I assumed these terms were the French equivalent of "organic,"
but I did wonder if I'd misunderstood "biodynamique," a term I'd never
encountered.
After I returned home, I did the logical thing and searched the Internet for "biodynamic." And I discovered that not only was my guess
wrong, biodynamic agriculture predates our contemporary understanding of organic
agriculture. The practice of biodynamics is precise, complicated, and
controversial.
Organic vs biodynamic agriculture
First, a caveat. The legal definitions for "certified organic" products vary from country to country. No national government certifies a "biodynamic" designation; Demeter
International, a network of national biodynamic certifiers, does so. "Sustainable" has no legal meaning, so I'll
say no more about it here.

Organic and biodynamic agriculture share a number of
practices: avoidance of synthetic chemicals for fertilization and pest control,
no genetically-modified (GMO) seed, and use of techniques that preserve the
integrity of the soil content and structure. For biodynamic practitioners,
though, this is not an agricultural system but a philosophy of agriculture
first espoused by anthroposophist Rudolf Steiner - the same Steiner who
developed the Waldorf approach to education. His eight lectures, Spiritual
Foundations for the Renewal of Agriculture, are the bible of biodynamic
farming. Like organic farmers, their biodynamic counterparts treat their farms
as living systems.
Unlike organic farmers, though, biodynamicists maintain
their living systems following the minutely specific regimen Steiner prescribes.
Only manual plowing is allowed. An affinities calendar, based on lunar cycles
and the Zodiac, dictates when different farming activities take place (see link
at end of post). Fields and crops receive preparations that increase soil
nutrients and improve soil structure, among other effects. The procedures for making these preparations
sound bizarre. For example, to make horn manure, the farmer stuffs cow horns
with fresh cow manure, buries the horns in the fall, unearths them in the spring, and distributes the stuff over fields in the spring. This brief paragraph doesn't begin to scratch the surface of the
biodynamic soil. This avowedly non-scientific approach to agronomy attracts
much criticism, even though many of the practices are similar to those used in
organic farming.

Is biodynamic better than organic?
Given the similarities between these two farming methods,
why opt for the more labor-intensive biodynamic approach? Is it less expensive?
Is it better for the soil? Does biodynamically-grown food taste better?
The small body of peer-reviewed research focuses on soil
quality and crop yields. J.P. Reganold of Washington State University's Dept.
of Crop and Soil Science, conducted a handful of studies between 1993-2002
comparing the effects of organic and biodynamic methods on soil biological
communities. The results consistently indicated that both biodynamic and
organic methods result in higher-quality soils, with better structure and
organic matter, but neither was superior to the other. Results from a
21-year-long Swiss study led by Paul Mader confirmed that both biodynamic and
organic methods greatly improve soils. Crop yields were 21% lower than
conventional farming, but the researchers concluded that the ecological
benefits outweighed the lower yields.
These studies didn't address subjective or qualitative
questions such as the flavor of crops grown organically/biodynamically. A small
but growing number of winemakers have embraced biodynamic methods, and they
believe that wines produced from biodynamic grapes absorb the characteristics
of the terroir - the qualities
imparted by the place the vines grow - much better than non-biodynamic grapes.
According to the Wine Folly website: no. According to Australian research
published earlier this year: yes.
In the 2010-2014 wines, ORG [organic] and in particular BD [biodynamic]
wines, were consistently described as being more rich, textural, complex and
vibrant than LCON [low-input conventional] and HCON [high-input conventional]
wines. These findings support anecdotal evidence from winemakers who have used
this language as a reason why they have chosen to make wine from organically
and/or biodynamically managed fruit.
A plus for wine made from biodynamic grapes is the lack of
added sulfites. This plus can be a minus if vintners want to ship wines, since
sulfites are preservatives.
The future for biodynamic agriculture
Interest in biodynamic agriculture is increasing. Demeter
International reports that in June of 2015 close to 5,000 farms worldwide have
earned its certification, doubling the number reported in 1997. Wine grape
growers and vintners were among early adopters of biodynamic practices;
vineyards are particularly well-suited to the Steiner regimen. For now I'll
leave as an exercise for my readers the decision about whether biodynamic wine,
or indeed any certified biodynamic agricultural product, has superior
qualities. I need another trip to France to make my own first-hand
determination.

Image credits
Demeter USA
Livesprings Farm
Caveau de la Tour
References
https://www.sciencemag.org/content/296/5573/1694?related-urls=yes&legid=sci;296/5573/1694
http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Place/50600000/Products-Reprints/2000/914.pdf
http://www.bio-dynamie.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/04_John-P.-Reganold-Soil-Quality-Profitability-of-BD-and-conventional-farming-systems.pdf
http://foodfromthesky.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/biodynamic_affinities-scaled-500.jpg?w=640
http://www.demeter.net/statistics
http://foodfromthesky.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/biodynamic_affinities-scaled-500.jpg?w=640
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biodynamic_agriculture#Biodynamic_preparations
https://cowhornwine.com/
https://www.organic-center.org/reportfiles/TasteReport.pdf
http://wineoscope.com/2015/05/14/empirical-evidence-organicbiodynamic-vit-more-textured-wines/
|