The Engineer's Notebook Blog

The Engineer's Notebook

The Engineer's Notebook is a shared blog for entries that don't fit into a specific CR4 blog. Topics may range from grammar to physics and could be research or or an individual's thoughts - like you'd jot down in a well-used notebook.

Previous in Blog: 2038: Y2K 2.0?   Next in Blog: World's Biggest (Sort of) Sailboat
Close
Close
Close
6 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Biodynamic Wine: More than Organic

Posted September 24, 2015 8:00 AM by BestInShow
Pathfinder Tags: agriculture biodynamic organic wine

My earlier CR4 blogs discussed non-chemical-based lawn-care practices, so you won't be surprised to see another entry along the general line of organic horticultural practices. While traveling around Provence last summer I saw quite a few vineyards labeled "biologique," "biodynamique" or simply just "bio." I assumed these terms were the French equivalent of "organic," but I did wonder if I'd misunderstood "biodynamique," a term I'd never encountered.

After I returned home, I did the logical thing and searched the Internet for "biodynamic." And I discovered that not only was my guess wrong, biodynamic agriculture predates our contemporary understanding of organic agriculture. The practice of biodynamics is precise, complicated, and controversial.

Organic vs biodynamic agriculture

First, a caveat. The legal definitions for "certified organic" products vary from country to country. No national government certifies a "biodynamic" designation; Demeter International, a network of national biodynamic certifiers, does so. "Sustainable" has no legal meaning, so I'll say no more about it here.

Organic and biodynamic agriculture share a number of practices: avoidance of synthetic chemicals for fertilization and pest control, no genetically-modified (GMO) seed, and use of techniques that preserve the integrity of the soil content and structure. For biodynamic practitioners, though, this is not an agricultural system but a philosophy of agriculture first espoused by anthroposophist Rudolf Steiner - the same Steiner who developed the Waldorf approach to education. His eight lectures, Spiritual Foundations for the Renewal of Agriculture, are the bible of biodynamic farming. Like organic farmers, their biodynamic counterparts treat their farms as living systems.

Unlike organic farmers, though, biodynamicists maintain their living systems following the minutely specific regimen Steiner prescribes. Only manual plowing is allowed. An affinities calendar, based on lunar cycles and the Zodiac, dictates when different farming activities take place (see link at end of post). Fields and crops receive preparations that increase soil nutrients and improve soil structure, among other effects. The procedures for making these preparations sound bizarre. For example, to make horn manure, the farmer stuffs cow horns with fresh cow manure, buries the horns in the fall, unearths them in the spring, and distributes the stuff over fields in the spring. This brief paragraph doesn't begin to scratch the surface of the biodynamic soil. This avowedly non-scientific approach to agronomy attracts much criticism, even though many of the practices are similar to those used in organic farming.

Is biodynamic better than organic?

Given the similarities between these two farming methods, why opt for the more labor-intensive biodynamic approach? Is it less expensive? Is it better for the soil? Does biodynamically-grown food taste better?

The small body of peer-reviewed research focuses on soil quality and crop yields. J.P. Reganold of Washington State University's Dept. of Crop and Soil Science, conducted a handful of studies between 1993-2002 comparing the effects of organic and biodynamic methods on soil biological communities. The results consistently indicated that both biodynamic and organic methods result in higher-quality soils, with better structure and organic matter, but neither was superior to the other. Results from a 21-year-long Swiss study led by Paul Mader confirmed that both biodynamic and organic methods greatly improve soils. Crop yields were 21% lower than conventional farming, but the researchers concluded that the ecological benefits outweighed the lower yields.

These studies didn't address subjective or qualitative questions such as the flavor of crops grown organically/biodynamically. A small but growing number of winemakers have embraced biodynamic methods, and they believe that wines produced from biodynamic grapes absorb the characteristics of the terroir - the qualities imparted by the place the vines grow - much better than non-biodynamic grapes. According to the Wine Folly website: no. According to Australian research published earlier this year: yes.

In the 2010-2014 wines, ORG [organic] and in particular BD [biodynamic] wines, were consistently described as being more rich, textural, complex and vibrant than LCON [low-input conventional] and HCON [high-input conventional] wines. These findings support anecdotal evidence from winemakers who have used this language as a reason why they have chosen to make wine from organically and/or biodynamically managed fruit.

A plus for wine made from biodynamic grapes is the lack of added sulfites. This plus can be a minus if vintners want to ship wines, since sulfites are preservatives.

The future for biodynamic agriculture

Interest in biodynamic agriculture is increasing. Demeter International reports that in June of 2015 close to 5,000 farms worldwide have earned its certification, doubling the number reported in 1997. Wine grape growers and vintners were among early adopters of biodynamic practices; vineyards are particularly well-suited to the Steiner regimen. For now I'll leave as an exercise for my readers the decision about whether biodynamic wine, or indeed any certified biodynamic agricultural product, has superior qualities. I need another trip to France to make my own first-hand determination.

Image credits

Demeter USA

Livesprings Farm

Caveau de la Tour

References

https://www.sciencemag.org/content/296/5573/1694?related-urls=yes&legid=sci;296/5573/1694

http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Place/50600000/Products-Reprints/2000/914.pdf

http://www.bio-dynamie.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/04_John-P.-Reganold-Soil-Quality-Profitability-of-BD-and-conventional-farming-systems.pdf

http://foodfromthesky.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/biodynamic_affinities-scaled-500.jpg?w=640

http://www.demeter.net/statistics

http://foodfromthesky.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/biodynamic_affinities-scaled-500.jpg?w=640

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biodynamic_agriculture#Biodynamic_preparations

https://cowhornwine.com/

https://www.organic-center.org/reportfiles/TasteReport.pdf

http://wineoscope.com/2015/05/14/empirical-evidence-organicbiodynamic-vit-more-textured-wines/

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: About 4000 miles from the center of the earth (+/-100 mi)
Posts: 9912
Good Answers: 1141
#1

Re: Biodynamic Wine: More than Organic

09/24/2015 9:57 AM

When I read a post with the word "Zodiac" in it, I know I'm wasting my time.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1071
Good Answers: 92
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Biodynamic Wine: More than Organic

09/25/2015 8:57 AM

Unless it's about inflatable boats!!

I wouldn't suggest burying cow horns full of manure in one of them though.

Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - Wannabeabettawelda

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Annapolis, Maryland
Posts: 7940
Good Answers: 458
#3

Re: Biodynamic Wine: More than Organic

09/25/2015 7:17 PM

The ironic thing is that with synthetic fertilizers, the dosage can be precisely controlled to avoid over-fertilization and reduce the unwanted effects on streams and rivers. Fertilizer is expensive. No farmer wants to use more than they need. Organic methods do not have very accurate ways of controlling the dosages. Regular farmers are not interested in destroying their soil either. It's their livelihood and they definitely have a significant interest in maintaining the viability of their soils. They will plant cover crops, rotate their crops and do the same sort of things to get the best possible yields and preserve their soils "for next year".

Stuffs cow horns with manure and bury them? OK, these folks are out there. I guess if it sounds whacky enough, there is a certain segment of the population who will be attracted to it. To each his own.

I wonder if I can get my biodynamic wine in a box?

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: About 4000 miles from the center of the earth (+/-100 mi)
Posts: 9912
Good Answers: 1141
#5
In reply to #3

Re: Biodynamic Wine: More than Organic

09/28/2015 1:27 PM

Personally, I'd rather eat vegetables fertilized with chemicals than cow poop!

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 482
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Biodynamic Wine: More than Organic

10/05/2015 12:03 PM

There are veggies in a cow poop, Rix!

and wild hallucinations too!

__________________
The doctor said "just one post or reply aday in CR4, take it or leave it". I said, "what does that mean?"
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 482
#4

Re: Biodynamic Wine: More than Organic

09/28/2015 9:19 AM

What is more than "organic" and probably what's less than "organic"?

__________________
The doctor said "just one post or reply aday in CR4, take it or leave it". I said, "what does that mean?"
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 6 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Brave Sir Robin (1); JNB (1); Legolaz (2); Rixter (2)

Previous in Blog: 2038: Y2K 2.0?   Next in Blog: World's Biggest (Sort of) Sailboat

Advertisement