Alternative & Renewable Energy Blog Blog

Alternative & Renewable Energy Blog

The Alternative & Renewable Energy Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about solar power; fuel cells and hydrogen cells; biofuels such as ethanol; wind, water and geothermal energy; and anything else related to renewable power generation. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Credit the ITC for Ongoing Solar Boom   Next in Blog: Commercial Flights Begin with Biofuels
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

US Offshore Wind Plods On

Posted April 14, 2016 10:10 AM by Hannes

Progress continues on the first offshore wind farm--scheduled for completion by the end of 2016--in American waters. The Block Island Wind Farm site sits three miles from the shore of Block Island in Rhode Island state waters. It will feature a 30 MW capacity thanks to five 6 MW Haliade turbines, formerly built by Alstom and now manufactured by GE in several European cities after GE's acquisition of Alstom in 2015.

Offshore wind faces a number of significant obstacles to widespread adoption in the US, the most significant being cost. For one, it has the highest levelized cost of energy (LCOE) of any power generation method considered for widespread adoption, according to the Energy Information Agency (EIA). A turbine's cost only represents 30-50% of an offshore project's total cost; the remaining 50% typically goes to specialized operations and maintenance costs, installation expenses, and the cost of other infrastructure such as subsea cables, batteries and other storage devices, and sometimes dedicated substations. So while it experiences less NIMBY-related opposition than onshore wind turbines, offshore's expense must be drastically reduced before there's any true competition.

And while US proponents of offshore wind claim that sea breeze is more powerful and reliable than terrestrial wind, and that turbines could be conveniently sited near heavily populated coastlines, the country's physical characteristics and climate leaves a lot to be desired. For one, US coastal waters are both deeper and less windy than the UK's, where offshore wind has seen huge development as well as better centralized policy support. Deeper waters mean more specialized (and specialized) foundations than the relatively simple monopiles used in European waters. Countries with deep coastal waters would have to invest in even more costly floating turbines for offshore wind power, as Japan did several years ago. And as far as climate goes, sunny parts of the country are more appropriate to renewables development involving solar power, and even windy areas are likely to be less breezy during periods of high power demand: hot, sunny days.

While widespread offshore wind remains beyond the horizon in the US, the Department of Energy is hopeful that the development of a reliable supply chain and improved technology could drastically lower costs in the next few decades. US projects face opposition from environmental groups carefully considering the potential impact of turbines on sea life, and customers who would rather not see their rates double due to offshore wind development. For every successful project like Block Island Wind Farm, there's been many more that've been shot down by local agencies. For more info and insight on the Block Island project and US offshore wind in general, check out this article on Engineering360.

Image credit: Global Marine Photos / CC BY-ND 2.0

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Commentator

Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: England
Posts: 86
Good Answers: 1
#1

Re: US Offshore Wind Plods On

04/15/2016 5:03 AM

At least there's some forward movement, unlike some areas of Europe where the NIMBY factor seems to be winning: Link Removed - CR4 Admin

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Madison, WI.
Posts: 2074
Good Answers: 77
#2
In reply to #1

Re: US Offshore Wind Plods On

04/15/2016 9:24 AM

Farm?

5? that's it?

More like a backyard garden plot.

__________________
Knowing is the end result of learning, not believing.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Out of your mind! Not in sight!
Posts: 4424
Good Answers: 108
#5
In reply to #1

Re: US Offshore Wind Plods On

04/17/2016 8:57 PM

The site you quote has links that contain malicious software threads.

Do not click on any links.

__________________
Common Sense Dictates
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - Wannabeabettawelda

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Annapolis, Maryland
Posts: 7940
Good Answers: 458
#3

Re: US Offshore Wind Plods On

04/15/2016 5:33 PM

One of the major problems with offshore wind is that it is so darned expensive. This Block Island job is five wind turbines with a cost of $290 Million. That is $58 Million for each 6 Megawatt (peak) turbine that produces unpredictable and intermittent power. The power is projected to be sold at 24.4 cents per kW-hr. My RETAIL cost of power here in Maryland is about 15 cents per kW-hr including energy costs, distribution costs, taxes, fees, and government mandated contributions to energy efficiency programs. Anyone else see a problem with this?

Couple the extraordinarily high capital costs with high operational and maintenance costs because of the harsh marine environment and difficult access, we have a non-optimal solution. Off-shore wind will turn into one of those "What was I thinking?" scenarios (except for the companies who will profit handsomely from it).

Reply
Guru
Fans of Old Computers - ZX-81 - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: 18N 65W o
Posts: 1003
Good Answers: 28
#4

Re: US Offshore Wind Plods On

04/17/2016 6:30 PM

Any idea how much US Taxpayers are on the hook for this? We have at least 3 wind farms in PR. The local one has 13, the one on the south shore 44. I'm not sure of the number on the NW corner. At any rate our residential rate is $.047 KWHr, with a fuel surcharge of just under $.08. When these were proposed, the surcharge hovered around $.22. They are buying the power from the wind turbines at $.15 KWHr. The US Congress is currently working on a multi-billion dollar bail out.

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 5 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Brave Sir Robin (1); IdeaSmith (1); JWthetech (1); Neiljohn (1); rashavarek (1)

Previous in Blog: Credit the ITC for Ongoing Solar Boom   Next in Blog: Commercial Flights Begin with Biofuels

Advertisement