Quality Control Blog

Quality Control

The Quality Control Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about product inspection technology, quality control methods & software, quality standards and compliance testing, defect prevention analysis. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: When a Self-driving Car Causes an Accident   Next in Blog: Robots That Speak Begin to Understand
Close
Close
Close
10 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Not Enough Testing of Autonomous Cars

Posted May 29, 2016 12:00 AM by Engineering360 eNewsletter

Gathering statistics to determine the safety of driverless cars turns out to be more complicated and more demanding than anticipated, according to a report from the Rand Corporation. U.S. drivers log almost 3 trillion miles a year, vastly different from the paltry 1.3 million miles over the past 6 years from the 55 vehicles in Google's fleet. Considering conventional cars' extremely low 1.09 fatalities and 77 injuries per 100 million miles driven, it would take 400 years and 8.8 billion miles for a fleet of 100 automated vehicles running 24 hours a day, 365 days a year to generate enough data for comparison. This item looks at the data and speculates on the types of additional testing necessary to reach sufficient confidence levels.


Editor's Note: This news brief was brought to you by the Quality, Test, & Measurement eNewsletter. Subscribe today to have content like this delivered to your inbox

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: About 4000 miles from the center of the earth (+/-100 mi)
Posts: 9912
Good Answers: 1141
#1

Re: Not Enough Testing of Autonomous Cars

05/29/2016 7:24 AM

And if you upgrade the software in that 400 years you have to start over.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7025
Good Answers: 207
#2

Re: Not Enough Testing of Autonomous Cars

05/29/2016 8:18 AM

maybe we should all move back into caves until we have more data that it's safe to live out here

Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harlow England
Posts: 16512
Good Answers: 670
#5
In reply to #2

Re: Not Enough Testing of Autonomous Cars

05/30/2016 5:10 AM

Yup, I'm up for that
Del

__________________
health warning: These posts may contain traces of nut.
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#6
In reply to #2

Re: Not Enough Testing of Autonomous Cars

05/30/2016 1:50 PM

It's never going to be safe.

Life will kill you, if nothing else does.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#3

Re: Not Enough Testing of Autonomous Cars

05/29/2016 4:54 PM

They're just using the Microsoft development philosophy.

Release it as soon as it doesn't crash for an hour and let the users sort it out and tell you how to fix it after that.

Disclaimer: "All warranties, express and implied, become null and void when the system/vehicle crashes."

Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harlow England
Posts: 16512
Good Answers: 670
#4

Re: Not Enough Testing of Autonomous Cars

05/30/2016 5:09 AM

Gathering statistics to determine the safety of driverless cars turns out to be more complicated and more demanding than anticipated, Err.. not than anticipated by most of us.
Del

__________________
health warning: These posts may contain traces of nut.
Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: About 4000 miles from the center of the earth (+/-100 mi)
Posts: 9912
Good Answers: 1141
#9
In reply to #4

Re: Not Enough Testing of Autonomous Cars

05/31/2016 2:35 PM

Err.. not than anticipated by most of us.

Yeah, most of "us", but maybe not the 95 percent of the population that know little or nothing about statistics.

Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Automotive Performance - New Member Technical Fields - Education - New Member Fans of Old Computers - TRS-80 - New Member Hobbies - Musician - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1331
Good Answers: 30
#7

Re: Not Enough Testing of Autonomous Cars

05/30/2016 5:45 PM

MicroStuff™, the market leader in selling "bugs, glitches, and blue-screens-of-death" since 1975.

__________________
...and the Devil said: "...yes, but it's a DRY heat..!"
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Tampa Florida USA
Posts: 180
Good Answers: 3
#8

Re: Not Enough Testing of Autonomous Cars

05/30/2016 6:57 PM

Someone needs to take statistics 101. Or at least google "sampling".

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Tampa Florida USA
Posts: 180
Good Answers: 3
#10

Re: Not Enough Testing of Autonomous Cars

05/31/2016 2:48 PM

I would consider 1.7 million miles a significant amount of data. So far, they have proven far more reliable than humans: http://www.gizmag.com/google-reveals-lessons-learned-from-self-driving-car-program/37481/

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 10 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

70AARCuda (1); Fredski (1); lyn (2); Rixter (2); sharpstick (2); user-deleted-1105 (2)

Previous in Blog: When a Self-driving Car Causes an Accident   Next in Blog: Robots That Speak Begin to Understand

Advertisement