The Engineer's Notebook Blog

The Engineer's Notebook

The Engineer's Notebook is a shared blog for entries that don't fit into a specific CR4 blog. Topics may range from grammar to physics and could be research or or an individual's thoughts - like you'd jot down in a well-used notebook.

Previous in Blog: Tough as Teflon: Ravel Technology (Part 2)   Next in Blog: Blowing One's Nose...Fluorescence?
Close
Close
Close
8 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

The Truth About PCBs (Part 1)

Posted September 13, 2007 3:57 PM by Steve Melito

Thirty years ago, Monsanto stopped manufacturing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), chemical compounds which consist of chlorine, carbon and hydrogen. As the primary U.S. manufacturer of these chlorinated hydrocarbons, Monsanto ended 50 years of PCB production on American soil. The company's 1977 decision followed passage of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) of 1976, a statute which empowered the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to track thousands of industrial chemicals. On July 2, 1979, federal law banned the production of PCBs altogether.

For many years, PCBs were used as electrical insulators in transformers and capacitors. They were marketed under trade names such as Aroclor, Askarel, Pyroclor, Sanotherm, Kennechlor, Hyvol, Chlorextol, and Pyranol. PCBs were popular because they were inexpensive and did not conduct electricity. They could also tolerate high temperatures and last a long time without degrading. Although PCBs were first used in electrical components, they were eventually used in heat transfer products, hydraulic fluids, adhesives, dye carriers, and plasticizers. Older electronic devices such as fluorescent lights, refrigerators, and television sets also contained PCBs.

PCBs were first manufactured commercially in 1927, by Alabama's Anniston Ordnance Company, the forerunner of Swann Chemical. Several years later, 23 of 24 workers at the plant began suffering from acne-like pustules – a classic sign of PCB exposure. After Swann was purchased by Monsanto in 1935, a senior official with the U.S. Public Health Surface reported that a plant worker's family had developed the same skin ailments from contact with the worker's clothes. In 1937, a conference at the Harvard School of Public Health concluded that "chlorinated diphenyl is certainly capable of doing harm in very low concentrations and is probably the most dangerous" of the chlorinated hydrocarbons studied.

For its part, American industry sought to minimize what Sanford Brown, president of Halowax Corp, called "mob hysteria" about the dangers of PCBs. A 1938 study by Westinghouse and General Electric (GE) asserted that skin contact with a PCB-oil mixture would not cause liver damage, but called for "greater personal hygiene" among workers who handled PCBs. A secret Monsanto study went further, however, admitting that "the toxicity of those compounds (PCBs) has been repeatedly demonstrated". Although Monsanto researchers continued to exchange confidential memos about their concerns, the chemical company did not provide workers with protective clothing and gear until the mid-1950s. By then, companies such as GE, Westinghouse, Sprague Electric and Appleton Paper had begun dumping PCBs and PCB-contaminated wastes in nearby waterways.

Click here for Part 2 of this series.

Resources:

http://www.clearwater.org/news/timeline.html

http://www.hercenter.org/facilitiesandgrounds/pcbs.cfm

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Posts: 313
Good Answers: 7
#1

Re: The Truth About PCBs (Part 1)

09/14/2007 10:08 AM

I think I remember reading that the toxicity of PCBs was due to the presence of trace amounts of dioxin, a by-product of the PCB manufacturing process. Do you know the facts on this?

Perhaps I am confusing PCBs with Agent Orange. These old brain cells contain too much corrupted data to be sure.

Bill Morrow

__________________
Bill Morrow
Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - Organizer Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2969
Good Answers: 33
#2
In reply to #1

Re: The Truth About PCBs (Part 1)

09/14/2007 11:13 AM

Thanks for your question, Bill. I'll do my best to provide an answer, but welcome any additions or clarifications from others who know more about dioxins.

It's my understanding that the term "dioxin" has both a narrow definition and a broad definition. The narrow definition refers to 2,3,7,8 -tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). The broad definition refers to a large family of chemical compounds which have a similar mechanism of toxicity.

Some of the web sites I visited state that PCBs are a type of dioxin. Others, including an EPA report called Toxic Equivalency Factors (TEFs) for Dioxins and Related Compounds, describe them as "dioxin-like" (Page 9-1) with "in vitro and in vivo effects similar to TCDD." (Page 9-4).

So did the PCB manufacturing process produce traces of dioxins? Although I was unable to find an "official" answer to this question, I did find this piece from the Vietnam Veterans of Ventura County (L. Vancil, Copyright 1994).

"Dioxin is a man made by-product of the manufacturing process for making Phenoxy herbicides like Agent Orange. Actually, when 2, 4, 5-T is manufactured a "synthetic contaminant" TCDD (2, 3, 7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin) is an unwanted by-product that cannot be removed."

I also found this.

"Dioxins are also created unintentionally during the manufacture of Chlorine containing products like the Polychlorinated Byphenal (PCB) oils used for years in the utility transformers that supply power to our homes."

Hope this helps.

Moose

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#4
In reply to #2

Re: The Truth About PCBs (Part 1)

09/14/2007 12:54 PM

Dioxins can be found in PCBs after manufacture. However, older PCBs used in applications are of concern, because heating PCBs has the potential to form extremely low levels of dioxins. Some dioxins are extremely toxic, but the family is fairly large. PCBs themselves would not be and are not exactly similar to the family of dioxins, but are a precursor to potential formation. Regarding the chloracne effect, this is a common effect of most chlorinated organics solvents. For the most part PCBs are relatively inert and durable. This is one reason for their use, but this means they remain in the environment with out degrading. They will build up in fat and just do nothing.

Reply
Power-User
Fans of Old Computers - PDP 11 - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In a mushroom field somewhere in Canada. Kept in the dark and fed sh--, well you know.
Posts: 312
#3

Re: The Truth About PCBs (Part 1)

09/14/2007 12:46 PM

If you want to find out more about PCB and Dioxin studies, google or search for the Love Canal studies done in New York in the seventies. Large amounts of Dioxin were found in ground and run-off water from the Love Canal site where large amounts of PCB's were buried. Is there a causal effect?? They are still arguing that in the courts today.

__________________
Dirt is for vegetables. Pavement is for racing.
Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - Organizer Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2969
Good Answers: 33
#5
In reply to #3

Re: The Truth About PCBs (Part 1)

09/14/2007 4:29 PM

Great idea. A very quick search of the Web indicates that 2007 is a year of anniversaries for Love Canal, too. From Wikipedia:

"In 1957, the City of Niagara Falls constructed sewers for a mixture of low-income and single family residences to be built on lands adjacent to the landfill site."

"The construction of the LaSalle Expressway restricted groundwater from flowing to the Niagara River. Following the wet winter and spring of 1977, the elevated expressway turned the breached canal into an overflowing pool."

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#6

Re: The Truth About PCBs (Part 1)

09/21/2007 7:41 PM

I saw a program once on PBS that covered a study of PCB's and the effect on migrating Salmon.The PCB had no effect until the salmon began to migrate, and burn body fat.Then the PCB's had to be processed by the liver, resulting in liver failure and premature death of the Salmon.

I have been heavily exposed to PCB's in my career and so far, have been blessed with no problems.I feel as if a sword is sometimes hanging over my head, but I don't dwell on it.Many of my previous co-workers have departed this world with various liver aliments.One thing for certain:I am not going on a diet.

Life is short...Eat dessert first!

HTRN

Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - Organizer Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2969
Good Answers: 33
#7
In reply to #6

Re: The Truth About PCBs (Part 1)

09/24/2007 8:09 AM

Thanks for joining the conversation, Guest. I hope you'll come back and register with CR4.

Reply
Power-User
Fans of Old Computers - PDP 11 - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In a mushroom field somewhere in Canada. Kept in the dark and fed sh--, well you know.
Posts: 312
#8

Re: The Truth About PCBs (Part 1)

09/24/2007 8:11 AM

Guest:

We wish you a long life and good health.

__________________
Dirt is for vegetables. Pavement is for racing.
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 8 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (2); bmorrow492 (1); Steve Melito (3); unclefastguy (2)

Previous in Blog: Tough as Teflon: Ravel Technology (Part 2)   Next in Blog: Blowing One's Nose...Fluorescence?

Advertisement