Engineering News Blog

Engineering News

Latest news of interest to engineers. Sourced from GlobalSpec's Engineering News

Previous in Blog: 'Smart roofs' can keep you cool and save energy   Next in Blog: Meteorite Makes Villagers Ill
Close
Close
Close
Rate Comments: Nested

Double Amputee Too 'Able Bodied' To Compete in the Olympics?

Posted September 19, 2007 9:14 AM

From Neatorama:

Oscar "The Blade Runner" Pistorius [wiki] (aka "The Fastest Man on No Legs"), a South African paralympic runner is a double amputee world record holder in the 100, 200 and 400 meter events. Oscar wanted to be the first amputee runner to compete in the Olympics, but other runners cried foul saying that his artificial running legs actually gave him an unfair advantage! From a New York Times article earlier this year: "I pose a question" for the I.A.A.F., said Robert Gailey, an associate professor of physical therapy at the University of Miami Medical School, who has studied amputee runners. "Are they looking at not having an unfair advantage? Or are they discriminating because of the purity of the Olympics, because they don't want to see a disabled man line up against an able-bodied man for fear that if the person who doesn't have the perfect body wins, what does that say about the image of man?" The question before the International Association of Athletics Federation, the governing body of the sport, was this: was Oscar the double amputee too "able-bodied" to compete? YouTube Link The answer seemed to be yes: the IAAF had banned the use of "any technical device that incorporates springs, wheels or any other element that provides a user with an advantage over another athlete not using such a device." Link: NY Times Article (Photo by Christopher Furlong)

Read the whole article

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: Double Amputee Too 'Able Bodied' To Compete in the Olympics?

09/20/2007 4:48 PM

The rule make sense i guess, otherwise it allows the use of mechanical assistance. Why run when you could drive, since everyone else does, would be the end result. A question i have is would we have an issue if the special olympics deemed someone to capable to compete, because they felt their natural (not enhanced) impairment was not sufficient enough to qualify. How do they justify that?

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry

Previous in Blog: 'Smart roofs' can keep you cool and save energy   Next in Blog: Meteorite Makes Villagers Ill

Advertisement