Last week, NASA announced its decision to delay the Mars
launch by two years, citing an unspecified conflict of interest during the
purchasing process. This bureaucratic breakdown caused the space agency to
disband the original board that picked the proposal for Mars exploration. NASA
has now created an entirely new board, a move which has caused a delay in the
process of awarding the contract.
The Mars Scout program had a scheduled launch date of 2011.
The atmospheric probe is worth $475 million (USD), and the proposal was between
which two research firms would run the mission. One firm was based in Colorado, and the other was based out in Texas. This conflict-of-interest
issue is costing NASA another $40 million and causing at least a two year
launch delay since Mars only comes close enough to Earth to launch probes every
26 months
The delay of the Mars mission poses a science vs. ethics
issue. Do you side with ethics and avoid the conflict of interest? Or do you embrace
the pursuit of science and avoid delaying a possible discovery for another two years? In this case, NASA made the ethical decision, but the space agency could
have made a very different one.
CR4 Aerospace Blog
|