Environmental Technology Blog

Environmental Technology

The Environmental Technology Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about refuse and recycling, pollution control solutions, hazardous waste and remediation, and environmental sensors. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: A Non-Dirty Dozen   Next in Blog: A Glass of Prozac?
Close
Close
Close
8 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Life in the Big Wheezy

Posted March 01, 2008 7:48 AM

Ah, life in the Big Easy: ruined neighborhoods, lost livelihoods, formaldehyde. Seems thousands of Hurricane Katrina victims housed in FEMA trailers in New Orleans are exposed to formaldehyde levels that are, on average, five times higher than exposures in most modern homes. U.S. Centers for Disease Control researchers are trying to find the source of the elevated carcinogen levels while FEMA scrambles to relocate residents in an area short of housing. These actions come 23 months after FEMA first received reports of health problems. How can this population be protected and how can this mess be remedied?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Environmental Technology, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Environmental Technology today.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: Life in the Big Wheezy

03/01/2008 11:10 PM

I have a very dear friend that has a family history dating back to the start of New Orleans. He loved growing up there but he said Katrina was just a matter of time. any time you have the ingorance to try to live below the level of a huge body of water that is near by you risk your life. We as a united people should spend our joint money and level New Orleans and make it the best fishing hole on earth. We have and are going to spend more making it almost livable before Katrina II happens. The pumps are on the edge of capacity all the time and the people think the rest of the country owes them something. In a way I agree we owe it to the good people with a long "tradition" of durability and grit to help them relocate and use their talents elsewhere. Right after Katrina I took 8 of my airconditioning technicains and went to our local shelter to get it ready for what was delcared on TV that thousands of displaced people were coming to Las Vegas to start over. I had the greatest pleasure of working with some of those wonderful people, it was very hard to say goodbye when they went back home. They all knew what they were going back to but they whent anyway. Sorry cant help you any more. However I would contribute to the leveling of the entire below water area. I know some of you will think this is harse but it is real. The water will come through the levy again.

Reply
2
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Near Delaware Water Gap
Posts: 1324
Good Answers: 83
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Life in the Big Wheezy

03/02/2008 12:02 AM

Then by all means, let's evacuate everyone in California living in the vicinity of the San Andreas fault, because Lord knows that thing is going to heave again soon. And by your reasoning, shouldn't we also level all property along the Ring of Fire, everything bordering the Pacific Ocean? It's well known for its seismic and volcanic activity. And tsunamis! Can't have that. Can't keep pouring money into cleaning up the aftermath of those things, can we? Your "reasoning" is specious, at best.

Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Western Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 761
Good Answers: 9
#4
In reply to #2

Re: Life in the Big Wheezy

03/02/2008 8:06 AM

As a consultant working frequently on the Gulf Coast, I have come to love and appreciate the tenacity of the residents of the FL Panhandle to TX.

All of the natives I have come to know will often say, discreetly, that something like Katrina is needed every so often to eliminate the overbuilding, destruction of barrier islands, and the greed of the developers & new owners of multi million dollar condos.

Katrina will eventually bring back a somewhat more idyllic life and hopefully convince people that you just don't build in some places and that you need to take care of the Gulf environmentally.

Respectfully posted.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California
Posts: 2363
Good Answers: 63
#7
In reply to #2

Re: Life in the Big Wheezy

03/24/2008 2:15 PM

Actually the worst fault lies along the Mississippi River. California are buidling codes to reduce and protect against large Seismic events, which are much less common than hurricanes. Florida has plans, agencies and some limited codes to protect against hurricanes (though admittedly the Seimic codes in California provide better protection against hurricanes than Florida Codes). I was in Florida the year before Katrina, when those three hurricanes hit central Florida back to back, anfd they though one was going to hit New Orleans and flood it even then. The State of Florida was better prepared, and the people knew what to expect. There were some people who took higher than acceptable risk by California Standards, but they all still faired prety well in general. FEMA is admittedly incompetant, but there job has always been to come in afterwards and provide money. The fact of the matter here is that the State of Louisiana was not prepared, and took dramatically inadequate measures to protect the citizens. The oldest part of New Orleans faired better than the newer areas, so apparently the vast amount of corruption in Louisiana over the years has allowed a level of development that was extremely unsafe. No residential portion of any community should lie below sea level. I would suggest that states that do not adequately try to mitigate the risk to their housing developments, should be excluded from federal funding in those areas if impacted and potential owners should be clearly notified in wirtting of this condition, then maybe people would pay attention to their government and force better development policies. Just because Donald Trump says he can build it, doesn't mean he should build it no matter how profitable it is to him, or that you should even buy it and live in it no matter how much cheaper it is.

Reply
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Engineering Fields - Transportation Engineering - New Member Popular Science - Evolution - New Member Technical Fields - Procurement - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Engineering Fields - Architectural Engineering - New Member Technical Fields - Marketing/Advertising - New Member Engineering Fields - Food Process Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mariposa Ca
Posts: 5800
Good Answers: 114
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Life in the Big Wheezy

03/02/2008 12:03 AM

What about the port?

what about the Metairie Ridge? higher ground site of the least damage, the land the french quarter is built on?

Does this mean we should abandon the entire gulf coast including Florida & Texas gulf coast?

The failure of the Levee's is the direct result of the corruption of the levee boards & ineptitude of the corp of engineers.

Holland is also below sea level, I suppose we consign them to the deep too.

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: High Point,N.C. USA
Posts: 185
Good Answers: 1
#5

Re: Life in the Big Wheezy

03/02/2008 2:37 PM

"how can this population be protected and how can this mess be remedied?

Easy answer:Dont let ANY more rebuilding in the area! It going to happen again! Anyone who designs a city BELOW the water line needs to be shot!

__________________
"WORKS FOR ME"
Reply
Power-User
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 110
Good Answers: 3
#6

Re: Life in the Big Wheezy

03/03/2008 11:10 AM

Things will be much better under Jindall than (Blank Stare) Blanco. It was supposed to be temporary FEMA shelter anyway, not your permenant freeloading home. Lets remember folks Bay St. Louis, Pass Christian, Gulfport, Biloxii took the direct hit. Much greater destruction than New Orleans. Mississippi jumped right in changed some laws within weeks of the storm asked for the proper federal assistance and are much further along in there recovery, thank you very much, than NO. Recovery is not going to be an overnight fix, complete recovery along the coast will take at least 10 or 15 years. What about the environmental damage to the Louisiana coastline which was much greater than a little flood damage in the Ward. For the most part the long term inhabatants of the FEMA trailers were welfare freeloaders before the storm what makes you think they will change there habits after. If they really wanted to be part of thye solution instead of part of the problem they would be WORKING at it in NO.

__________________
ONE TEST IS WORTH A THOUSAND EXPERT OPINIONS
Reply Off Topic (Score 4)
Power-User

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 454
Good Answers: 24
#8

Re: Life in the Big Wheezy

03/14/2009 2:22 PM

I have visited NOLA several times, and I have wondered at the complacency of the state and of Corps of Engineers. Why were there not secondary levees as a back-up if the first should fail? Why were the shotgun houses not elevated on higher piers? (Many or most were on short piers, rather than continuous foundations, so jacking them up 4 feet would not have been a big deal) What happened to all the volunteer organizations which were or might have been in place to assist in evacuation and rescue? (It seems the powers that be would not allow volunteer efforts) Why were the school busses not used? Why couldn't the many ships who were waiting out the storm take away flood victims with their lifeboats? (And provide water, etc.) Why weren't US Navy and Marine ships and amphibious vehicles and helicopters told to do a "training exercise" in the wake of the storm, if not before? Why were the hospitals and nursing homes ignored? How could so many delusional idiots just stand around shuffling paper, when action was needed?

It might also be noted that, after the San Francisco earthquake and fire, a century before Katrina, rescue and recovery efforts were underway as it was happening, without anyone having to get permission from FEMA. The Army, for example, sent a trainload of tents, which were set up in public parks. They didn't have the amenities of FEMA trailers, but they got there a lot quicker.

It might be noted that the Rainbow Gathering, "hippies" who camp out, were quick to respond and set up feeding stations after Katrina (without asking permission). After all, if you can live in the woods without electricity or running water, why not in New Orleans?

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 8 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); erssk (1); esbuck (1); Garthh (1); James P. Hollen (1); qaqcpipeman (1); RCE (1); sue (1)

Previous in Blog: A Non-Dirty Dozen   Next in Blog: A Glass of Prozac?

Advertisement