Aerospace Blog Blog

Aerospace Blog

The Aerospace Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about aeronautics, astronautics, fixed-wing aircraft, future space travel, satellites, NASA, and much more.

Previous in Blog: F-35 Lightning II: Next Generation Fighter (Part 2)   Next in Blog: How a Crack Influences the Flutter of a Composite Aircraft Wing
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Scramjets: Viable Hypersonic Solution or Expensive Pipe Dream?

Posted June 30, 2008 4:00 AM by Eric Schneiter

In recent years, enormous resources have been allocated to the research and development of supersonic ramjet engines called scramjets. These engines have no moving parts, do not need to carry a heavy tank of oxidizer (as rockets do), and are theoretically capable of speeds up to Mach 25.
The basic principle of the scramjet is similar to that of a standard ramjet engine. Air from the atmosphere enters the engine at the inlet, where it is compressed to high pressure and temperature. Fuel is added to achieve combustion. The combusted air is then directed out of the exit nozzle to provide thrust.
The key difference between a ramjet and a scramjet is that in the scramjet, the airflow through the engine remains supersonic throughout the process, as opposed to slowing below Mach 1 in the ramjet design. Keeping the flow supersonic avoids a large shock caused by slowing the flow to subsonic speeds. This results in a much lower drag on the engine. Also, since the gas is slowed less by the scramjet, it is heated less, which results in a more efficient combustion.
One of the major drawbacks of scramjets is that in order for flow to remain supersonic through the entire engine, the scramjet must be moving at a speed of about Mach 5 or greater for proper functioning. Therefore, the scramjet must reach Mach 5 by conventional means - which is no small task. Furthermore, not much is known about the fluid dynamics involved in the hypersonic regime. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is just getting to the point where it can begin to work on some of the problems of hypersonic flight. Some of these problems include turbulent mixing, two-phase flow, and flow separation.
Today major research is being done by groups such as NASA and the U.S. Navy. Research is also being done at the academic level. NASA and aerospace firms such as ATK have teamed up with a number of schools in Virginia, including Virginia Tech and the University of Virginia, to form the Hy-V program (pronounced high five). The goal of this project is to test how well wind-tunnel scramjet tests reflect actual scramjet flight.
Scramjet technology may one day provide civilians with extremely fast transcontinental flight, space programs with single-stage-to-orbit flight, or the military with high-speed reconnaissance aircraft like the conventionally powered SR-71 Blackbird. This is, however, a very new and untested technology that many suspect to be too good to be true. Only time will tell.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 23647
Good Answers: 420
#1

Re: Scramjets: Viable Hypersonic Solution or Expensive Pipe Dream?

06/30/2008 2:58 PM

Scramjet technology may one day provide civilians with extremely fast transcontinental flight, space programs with single-stage-to-orbit flight, or the military with high-speed reconnaissance aircraft like the conventionally powered SR-71 Blackbird.

Do not know how much research was done here, but they have a very long way to go. And having the scramjet run more efficient is only a small part of bigger problems to solve.

Such as the expansion of materials due to temperature change, to seal the fuel tanks. Full fuel tanks on a SR-71 would basically drain empty if sitting on a runway, if it had to wait for lets say...... A president of the United States getting a haircut on Air Force One, parked next it. .

__________________
“ When people get what they want, they are often surprised when they get what they deserve " - James Wood
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Hobbies - Model Rocketry - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: East of Seattle, Washington state Republic of the 50 states of America
Posts: 2045
Good Answers: 36
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Scramjets: Viable Hypersonic Solution or Expensive Pipe Dream?

07/01/2008 8:52 PM

Full fuel tanks on a SR-71 would basically drain empty if sitting on a runway

It is my understanding that they used a minimum of three different fuels to get up to operating temp. Starting with thick as could get to burn but safer to spill on the runway.

Most of the scramjet basics come from flying a bullet of special shape down a long barrel of mixed fuel and oxidizer. What has been done from there is .

The dynamic of going from a enclosed system to an open chaotic one is challenging to say the least.

Even if the problems are overcome will we ever know? Time may tell.

Brad

__________________
(Larrabee's Law) Half of everything you hear in a classroom is crap. Education is figuring out which half is which.
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 23647
Good Answers: 420
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Scramjets: Viable Hypersonic Solution or Expensive Pipe Dream?

07/02/2008 9:21 AM

Brad,

You have me there, I had pick that info up on a program about the developments at the skunk-works. I am sure they improved.

They had to refuel as soon as they were airborn.

phoenix911

__________________
“ When people get what they want, they are often surprised when they get what they deserve " - James Wood
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Hobbies - Model Rocketry - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: East of Seattle, Washington state Republic of the 50 states of America
Posts: 2045
Good Answers: 36
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Scramjets: Viable Hypersonic Solution or Expensive Pipe Dream?

07/04/2008 1:06 AM

Yes they refueled with normal fuel to get up to heat then used hi octane for super cruse. Had a friend that did some time refueling them things. They would also dump any thick of low power fuel to get as much hi test as they could then change fuel/dump again to land. I had to laugh at the description in the program of it being purpose built for recon. The external missile was top mount but had issues of launch turbulence.

Brad

__________________
(Larrabee's Law) Half of everything you hear in a classroom is crap. Education is figuring out which half is which.
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 306
Good Answers: 15
#2

Re: Scramjets: Viable Hypersonic Solution or Expensive Pipe Dream?

07/01/2008 10:22 AM

My view: Expensive pipe dream.

Try making a roadable airplane that works, then go faster with less fuel and so on. Once you can do .8 mach with that roadable airplane, getting 50 miles per gallon, then try doing 1.2 Mach with no noise. Once you get that right, then move up...

Put first things first. Hypersonic is the END not the beginning. If this was not funded by massive government funds it would never see the light of day.

Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Reply to Blog Entry 5 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

phoenix911 (2); seaplaneguy (1); U V (2)

Previous in Blog: F-35 Lightning II: Next Generation Fighter (Part 2)   Next in Blog: How a Crack Influences the Flutter of a Composite Aircraft Wing

Advertisement