Power Generation and Distribution Blog Blog

Power Generation and Distribution Blog

The Power Generation and Distribution Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about electrical power generation, designing and installing power systems, high voltage power lines, power distribution, design & installation services, and anything else related to the power generation industry. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Will Higher Shipping Costs Kill World Trade?   Next in Blog: Will Slower Economy Open Closed Markets?
Close
Close
Close
6 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Have Technology, Have Pollution Anyway

Posted December 06, 2008 8:16 AM

New research reveals that China's coal plants are among the world's worst air pollution emitters. But it's not because they lack pollution control equipment, it's because the plants are not operated properly. Specifically, plant operators buy dirty, cheap coal unsuited to plant design, and they often turn off scrubbers and other pollution control equipment to save money. Relevant technological and regulatory infrastructures are in place but are not in play. Why invest in state-of-the-art combustion and controls if not to use them?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Power Generation & Distribution, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Power Generation & Distribution today.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
United States - Member - Charter Member Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - Charter Member

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The People's Republic of Massachusetts
Posts: 1946
Good Answers: 73
#1

Re: Have Technology, Have Pollution Anyway

12/06/2008 3:08 PM

"Relevant technological and regulatory infrastructures are in place but are not in play."

Well, I guess that means it's not "Relevant", doesn't it. So what part don't we understand. There's no EPA, no watchdog organizations. They do what ever they want, as long as there is money to be made. The world goes along, because because they get products on the cheap. But guess what, the wind blows, and the water flows.

http://newsok.com/chinas-growing-pollution-reaches-u.s./article/2822309

You get what you pay for.

__________________
I go into every human encounter expecting to be framed for a crime I didn't commit. Dilbert, 2013
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Model Rocketry - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: East of Seattle, Washington state Republic of the 50 states of America
Posts: 2045
Good Answers: 36
#2

Re: Have Technology, Have Pollution Anyway

12/07/2008 12:34 AM

And when the plant managers oldest boy has Mercury poisoning things will change. You can only pee in your own pool so long before you die from swimming in it.

They have found a form of natural population control called greedy stupidity. They will learn, die or wish they died.

What they will find is unless they change they will weaken themselves to where outside influences can take control.

Brad

__________________
(Larrabee's Law) Half of everything you hear in a classroom is crap. Education is figuring out which half is which.
Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Associate

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 41
Good Answers: 1
#3

Re: Have Technology, Have Pollution Anyway

12/07/2008 3:03 AM

This is not just the plant owners conspiracy, it's backed by Beijing in the name of more profit for them too.

If they cut their generator's profits, their profits get cut too, so they stand firmly in the "It's OK As Long As We're Making Money" camp.

Then they go to International Climate Control conferences and scream that it's all the fault of the greedy Western and Japanese devils because they won't give the poor Chinese generators their latest technology for free.

Yes, that's what they demand, knowing all along that they HAVE the technology, but they would rather pay the human cost of not using it than the monetary cost of using it.

Hello?

Is anybody home?

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 378
Good Answers: 24
#4

Re: Have Technology, Have Pollution Anyway

12/07/2008 7:59 PM

Relax, the 'Human Period' appears headed toward early demise in earth's time frame. It is very doubtful that significant numbers of humans will exist in another 1000 years or less. So, the 'Human Period' will be some 5000 years long, a near instantaneous event in geological time.

It is an inescapable FACT the earth cannot sustainably support the human population of even 1800 at the 'standard of living' of today, much less the population of today. Oil is only the presently most 'visible' of natural resources we have plundered. There are hundreds, if not thousands of other resources even more severely depleted from exploitation in the last 100 years. We may be near or even past the 'point of no return' in decimating the large fish ecology in the oceans.

The current mystery of sudden die-off of cultivated honey bees may cause sudden and drastic reduction in both animal and human foodstuffs in our 'mono-culture agribusiness' dominated food chain.

Thermodynamics enables us to understand Entropy and how Entropy governs all things we see,touch,eat,etc., including us. The most important FACT is 'there is no free lunch.' Everything we change in any manner or degree causes an increase in Entropy. We MUST spend ENERGY to accomplish that. Think about gold for a minute. We spend tremendous amounts of energy--both fossil fuels and human/animal- to extract gold from concentrated deposits that were created over millions of years. We are then dispersing it widely, -in jewelry, tooth fillings, electronic parts,etc that are 'burried' in many many thousands of locations--not the few like we found it in.

We humans are and have been gorging on natural resources because those are the only one that really exist. We have allowed the population to swell so far above sustainability that sudden demise of the 'Human Age' is essentially a certainty. A few hundred coal power plants in China will only slightly shorten the time until that sudden decline starts.

We build huge facilities in remote locations out of scarce and costly materials to liquify natural gas so we can move it around the world, and one of the larger uses of natural gas is to make nitrogenous fertilizers. We quickly exhausted natural sources (bat guano) well over a century ago. We use the fertilizer to grow mono-culture plants to feed large mono-culture animals to use as human food.

Maybe we are at the tipping point now?

__________________
Keith E Bowers, PMP
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Model Rocketry - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: East of Seattle, Washington state Republic of the 50 states of America
Posts: 2045
Good Answers: 36
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Have Technology, Have Pollution Anyway

12/07/2008 8:05 PM

I've always said we should colonise the solar system and make Earth a park.

Brad

__________________
(Larrabee's Law) Half of everything you hear in a classroom is crap. Education is figuring out which half is which.
Reply
Anonymous Poster
#6

Re: Have Technology, Have Pollution Anyway

12/14/2008 8:36 AM

Good Question. Why?

Possibly some or all of these plants are privately owned.

Government or States also may own some of these and have in place Laws may mandate such Equipment for all plant operators.

Owners private or Governmental may though feel (whether motivated by greed or some other state of mind) disadvantaged by following such laws and good responsible Engineering practices.

It is the usual common problem. It seems as though each Human generation feels only responsible for their own immediate and personal needs and that they are responsible to no one else.

Put on a show of Engineering capability but the bottom line morals of an alley cat.

Trully a dilema of which most refuse to address today as relevent for our future prosperity.

So what Standards will address this problem? Any Ideas?

J.Archer

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 6 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

annaesthetised (1); Anonymous Poster (1); Bricktop (1); Keith E Bowers (1); U V (2)

Previous in Blog: Will Higher Shipping Costs Kill World Trade?   Next in Blog: Will Slower Economy Open Closed Markets?

Advertisement